|  | 
07-10-2009, 05:02 PM
| | | | Emulating JPJ- Flats or Rounds?
Sign in to disble this ad
Lately, I've been listening to a lot of Zep and have really taken a liking to John Paul Jones' tone and playing style. I'm trying to emulate his signature "jazz bass" sound (I have a Squier CV Jazz)- I've done a lot of research and I've seen highly conflicting reports on whether he uses rounds or flats on his jazz. I remember seeing a picture of him from the 60's a while back and it looked like he had flats on his Jazz but who knows.
Just wondering if anyone could provide any insight. Thanks | 
07-10-2009, 05:07 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA | | In an interview with Bass Player magazine that question was asked: Did you prefer flatwounds or roundwounds on your 4-string basses? Everybody used to think I used flatwounds, but I stopped using flatwounds back in the session days because they just didn’t give me the sustain I wanted.
Interview here: http://www.bassplayer.com/article/le...n/jan-08/33215
__________________
Peavey Amps Club Member #56 / Bassists with Beards Club Member #123
| 
07-10-2009, 05:14 PM
| | | I'd seen that article, and I thought- oh, the mystery's solved.
Then I found the following picture:
Am I crazy or do those look like flats? This picture was from 1967, by the way. | 
07-10-2009, 05:19 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2000 Location: Poulsbo,Wa | | | Its hard to tell from that picture whether it is flats or rounds.
__________________
"Thats the worst lookin hat I ever saw!! Buy a hat like that and I bet you get a free bowl of soup."
| 
07-10-2009, 05:21 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA | | | Hard for me to tell from the picture. Maybe really worn out roundwounds?
__________________
Peavey Amps Club Member #56 / Bassists with Beards Club Member #123
| 
07-10-2009, 05:34 PM
| | | | They look a lot like flats to me. I'm beginning to wonder if JPJ just has poor memory because there are a lot of tunes of Zeppelin 1-4 that sound a lot like flats. Anyone else have any input? | 
07-10-2009, 05:37 PM
|  | I'm a tumbler, born under punches | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Northern California | | Well, these days he uses rounds. And a 10 string bass. And a whammy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGHWxLruLvA
I loved JPJ's tone with Zeppelin, but it's interesting that while so many people try to capture what he did back in the day, the man himself has constantly changed, going from Jazz basses through a tube amp to Alembics through GK rigs to custom basses today.
Again, I don't think there's anything wrong with wanting that old school tone (it still sounds great to me) just interesting to note how JPJ has always moved forward in terms of his sound.
He also looks a lot younger than Page and Plant these days and can obviously still bring it. I can't wait to hear his album with Dave Grohl and Josh Homme (and maybe Mike Patton), I can't imagine it being less than awesome. | 
07-10-2009, 05:48 PM
| | | | Ah perhaps I wasn't being clear that I'm going for his "old school" sound, but that 10 string video is really sick. You're right, as JPJ has always moved forward and changed his sound with the invention of new (often crazy) instruments.
I too am excited for that "trifecta of awesome" as somebody on this forum put it.
But back on the subject of strings, anyone else have anything to add?
Last edited by bencwalker : 07-10-2009 at 05:50 PM.
| 
07-10-2009, 06:00 PM
|  | Registered User Endorsing Artist: see profile | | Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: toms_river.nj.us | | | I don't know what he used... but I can best cop his early tone on a Jazz with flats | 
07-10-2009, 06:09 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2000 Location: Melnibone | | | I suspect that in Zep's early days, flats were just about all that was available. | 
07-10-2009, 06:36 PM
|  | I'm a tumbler, born under punches | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Northern California | | Quote:
Originally Posted by bencwalker Ah perhaps I wasn't being clear that I'm going for his "old school" sound, but that 10 string video is really sick. You're right, as JPJ has always moved forward and changed his sound with the invention of new (often crazy) instruments.
I too am excited for that "trifecta of awesome" as somebody on this forum put it.
But back on the subject of strings, anyone else have anything to add? | Yeah, didn't mean to derail your thread there. Anyway, I get a pretty similar tone from my "Jazz" bass (Stambaugh with an Audere pre and Nordy Fat Stacks) and TI Jazz Flats. It sounds super old school through a tube amp (at least the two times I"ve tried it), but less so through my SS rigs. LaBellas might get you there too, but the TI Jazz Flats are a nice middle ground. | 
07-10-2009, 06:43 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: San Diego, California | | Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigO Yeah, didn't mean to derail your thread there. Anyway, I get a pretty similar tone from my "Jazz" bass (Stambaugh with an Audere pre and Nordy Fat Stacks) and TI Jazz Flats. It sounds super old school through a tube amp (at least the two times I"ve tried it), but less so through my SS rigs. LaBellas might get you there too, but the TI Jazz Flats are a nice middle ground. | yeah, the TIs are considerably brighter and have more sustain than the LaBellas. I think they're a great pick for nailing the "JPJ sound" | 
07-10-2009, 07:03 PM
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigO Yeah, didn't mean to derail your thread there. Anyway, I get a pretty similar tone from my "Jazz" bass (Stambaugh with an Audere pre and Nordy Fat Stacks) and TI Jazz Flats. It sounds super old school through a tube amp (at least the two times I"ve tried it), but less so through my SS rigs. LaBellas might get you there too, but the TI Jazz Flats are a nice middle ground. |
Not a problem, TheBigO, I appreciated the contribution a ton. I'm stuck with a set of Roto Flats right now, but I think I'll try and get my hands on a set of LaBellas soon (TI's are a bit pricey for me  ). Thanks for the strings reccomendations! | 
07-11-2009, 05:11 PM
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by bencwalker | I agree with both of you , regardless of what strings he used , using flats is the easiest way to get his early led zep tone | 
07-11-2009, 05:19 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: San Diego, California | | Quote:
Originally Posted by bencwalker Not a problem, TheBigO, I appreciated the contribution a ton. I'm stuck with a set of Roto Flats right now, but I think I'll try and get my hands on a set of LaBellas soon (TI's are a bit pricey for me  ). Thanks for the strings reccomendations! | yeah rotos would be the worst possible flats if you're going for a JPJ sound
i dunno about labellas though, they really lack sustain (which is neither good nor bad - sometimes that's exactly what you want, but it's not ideal in this case). maybe you should look into d'addario chromes if the TIs seem too pricey?
I would try TIs, because they last absurdly long, and if you decide you don't like them you can re-sell them in the TB classifieds... yep, people pay for used flats. I bet you lose less than 15 bucks on the experiment | 
07-11-2009, 06:41 PM
| | | | Alright, I'll have to check my local shop for some TI Flats. The supposed lack of sustain that LaBellas have doesn't sound ideal for copping JPJ. If they don't have any TI's I'll be sure to try out the chromes as I've heard nothing but great things about 'em.
Edit: RCCollins, you mentioned that rotos are the worst possible flats for emulating JPJ- just out of curiosity, why is that? Just wondering. Thanks
Last edited by bencwalker : 07-11-2009 at 06:58 PM.
| 
07-11-2009, 09:59 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Tropical Paradise of Winnipeg | | | The question of flats vs. rounds aside, we should also keep in mind JPJ's technique, combined with his choice of gear, has a great bearing on the overall tonal quality.
Watching some of these old Zeppelin video clips, I can't help noticing JPJ is one of those people who play up closer to the neck than most (as seen in the photo above posted by bencwalker) - almost at the end of the fingerboard, which results in fuller and mellower sound overall.
__________________
Nuts about things that groove!
Last edited by groovenut57 : 07-11-2009 at 10:08 PM.
| 
07-11-2009, 10:19 PM
| | | | Yeah good point groovenut, playing up by the neck gives it that nice thick mellow sound. Where you play the strings makes an enormous difference in how you sound. And in the way of gear, was he running the Acoustic 360's back in the day or was he using something else? And aside from his bass pedals, he wasn't running any "effect" specific pedals was he? | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |