Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Strings [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-24-2011, 11:51 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA
Send a message via AIM to michaeln Send a message via Yahoo to michaeln
GHS M305 Stainless Steel Precision Flatwounds too long for my Precision?

Sign in to disble this ad
I just received a set of M3050 Precision Flatwound strings from Amazon. These are advertised as fitting 34" and 35" scale basses. My bass is a Squier Vintage Modified Precision Bass, and it has a 34" scale (and I measured it to double check).

However, I stopped trying to fit these strings when I saw that with the ball end through the bridge (this is not through-body stringing, the balls butt up against the bottom of the bridge), I would have wind the unsilked portion of the string around the post
because the string is so long that the silked area starts about an inch past where the E string peg is. The heavy wound unsilked part would have to go around the peg.

Is this normal for these strings? The package and the inner envelopes are all marked as M3050 Medium (45-105). It looks to me like these would just barely work on a 35" scale bass.
__________________
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. -- Woody Allen

Last edited by michaeln : 01-24-2011 at 04:50 PM.
  #2  
Old 01-24-2011, 12:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA
Send a message via AIM to michaeln Send a message via Yahoo to michaeln
This is how the Fender strings fit (the ball end is through the bridge and up against it):



This is how the GHS string fits:



I just heard back from GHS support, and they say they don't have any flatwound strings suitable for a 34" scale Precision unless it has through-body stringing.

I am absolutely fumdounded! P-bass with the L bridge is about the lowest common denominator out there, the ORIGINAL electric bass that has been in production since before Noah forgot to NOT bring along those two mosquitos, and GHS doesn't have flats for it?

Amazing.
__________________
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. -- Woody Allen
  #3  
Old 01-24-2011, 02:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
I had problems with strings being too long from several string companies. The only company that was willing to work with me was Rotosound. I sent them pics of the problem and they custom cut me a string from the lathe and sent it me, for free.
  #4  
Old 01-24-2011, 02:14 PM
RCCollins's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, California
Supporting Member
wrap it around a couple times
  #5  
Old 01-24-2011, 02:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA
Send a message via AIM to michaeln Send a message via Yahoo to michaeln
Well that was very cool of Rotosound. GHS offered to swap this set for something else, but they don't make anything else I want. I had never used GHS strings in the past on any of my many basses, and I doubt I will look at them in the future. I bought the strings from Amazon, so back they go for a refund.

I really think it is deceptive advertising for GHS to say these fit 34" scale without mentioning that it will only work if you have through body stringing.
__________________
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. -- Woody Allen
  #6  
Old 01-24-2011, 02:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA
Send a message via AIM to michaeln Send a message via Yahoo to michaeln
I'm not sure what flats to get now. Years ago I tried the LaBella Jamerson set on my '62 Reissue and found they had too much tension and bowed the neck like crazy, even with trussrod adjustments. I liked the Thomastik Jazz Flats, but although they LOOK like flats they almost sound like roundwounds, and they are pretty darn expensive.
__________________
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. -- Woody Allen
  #7  
Old 01-24-2011, 02:34 PM
JTE's Avatar
JTE JTE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central Illinois, USA
Supporting Member
Must be a recent change. All my GHS flats (well, most of them are Lakland Joe Osborn flats) fit without any problem. In my experience there's no problem with winding the un-silked portion of the string around the tuning machine on a Precision with the large barrels. I wouldn't try it on something with the very small barrels like a Schaller M6 machine, but there shouldn't be any problem with your bass.

John
__________________
JTE
Spelling, grammar, and punctuation do matter, despite the threats of death by grease fire!

"Without space, music is just noise piling up on itself." TRK

Lakland Owners' Club # 248
  #8  
Old 01-24-2011, 02:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portsmouth, VA
I have GHS Precision Flatwound 3025's on both of my P basses the silk does not make a full turn on the peg for the E string.
  #9  
Old 01-24-2011, 02:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA
Send a message via AIM to michaeln Send a message via Yahoo to michaeln
Thanks, but I think I will try something else. GHS support said:

"The M3050 set is wound to 38” from ball to silk taper 44” overall length. These will fit on a standard long scale bass 34” with string through body. We do not have a Flatwound string that is wound to 36 ½” for standard long scale. This would be the length wind you would need."
__________________
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. -- Woody Allen
  #10  
Old 01-24-2011, 03:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTE View Post
In my experience there's no problem with winding the un-silked portion of the string around the tuning machine on a Precision with the large barrels.
John
Yep, if you're carefull this will work.
I didn't like the GHS percisions at first, but they got better and better. They will probaly stay on this bass forever, cause I'm too afraid to break them.
I mostly use Chromes, they fit perfectly on a 34".
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	GHS.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	56.2 KB
ID:	197100  Click image for larger version

Name:	Chromes.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	36.7 KB
ID:	197101  
  #11  
Old 01-24-2011, 03:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portsmouth, VA
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaeln View Post
Thanks, but I think I will try something else. GHS support said:

"The M3050 set is wound to 38” from ball to silk taper 44” overall length. These will fit on a standard long scale bass 34” with string through body. We do not have a Flatwound string that is wound to 36 ½” for standard long scale. This would be the length wind you would need."
I just got off the phone with GHS because of your post, what they said was you don't want too much of the string on the peg. My string does not make a full turn and the Tech said that was okay the problem is that the flatwound wrap can start to separate.

Before you give up on your strings check this out. (Look at the silk on the E string)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE5R3rUoU58

Plus they sound great!

Last edited by Ron G : 01-24-2011 at 03:20 PM.
  #12  
Old 01-24-2011, 04:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA
Send a message via AIM to michaeln Send a message via Yahoo to michaeln
Well, thanks for staying on me about this. I decided based on several folks here having success with them to go ahead and try them. The E string is the only funky one, and it has about 1/2 of a turn of non-silked string around the post. The others have 1-2" of silk completely off the post (not wound). I wonder why the E is set up differently?

Anyway, I am delighted with the sound and feel of them, so I will leave them on. I think that as long as that E doesn't get completely removed and reinstalled multiple times the winding will be OK.
__________________
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. -- Woody Allen
  #13  
Old 01-24-2011, 04:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
A while back, I ordered a set of GHS Brite Flats and the E string was exactly as you said. I remember seeing on this site a post about this and how GHS has standardized on a longer string and were really not making a true 34" scale string as 35-36" scale string would work on a 34". I did exactly as you did, looks weird bit works fine.
  #14  
Old 01-24-2011, 05:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Portsmouth, VA
They are the best sounding flats I have tried. (Chromes, DR, Roto, La Bella)
  #15  
Old 03-14-2011, 05:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canada
I think it's downright goofy and a bad business move for GHS to make flats that don't fit a top-load P-bass. And GHS flats are my favourite.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:57 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.