Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Strings [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 02-26-2006, 04:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Jaco pastorius string gauge

Well I know jaco pastorius was using rotosound swing bass but I' m not sure about the tention/gauge.
I have read 45-105 , then 40-100... .Perhaps he have tryed different gauge during is carear ?
Well if someone have good source on this subject don' t hesitate !
  #2  
Old 02-26-2006, 05:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
The original Rotosound swing bass were guaged:
46-63-80-102.
This is what Jaco used and would be closer to 45-105
than 40-100.
  #3  
Old 02-27-2006, 04:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
So string gauge of "old" swing bass set were very closed to the actual 45-65-80-105.Or even closer to 45-65-80-100 (from other manufacturer).
I use swing bass in 45-105 (80) for a year now.Nothing sound better on my jazz to my opinion !
Just put DR fatbeams with same gauge.they are much more flexible and in a sense easyer to play but the sound was below : big drop in volume, sound is different, great but not as "speaking" as the roto for me.
Thank' s very much for this interesting information on roto string and jaco...
  #4  
Old 02-27-2006, 05:47 PM
Registered User

Avatar Club#12 Eden Club Lucky# 13--USA Peavey Club#37 Carvin Club#5
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern Wisconsin
DR

I think DR Highbeams are closer to the sound of the Roto's, and are softer, and easier to play, in my opinion.
  #5  
Old 02-28-2006, 03:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Perhaps high-beam in 45-100 would be a good thing to try for me...But are the high-beam really different when compared to fat-beams ?
I know they are both stainless steel with round-core...This is why I have thought they are similar.So ?
  #6  
Old 02-28-2006, 09:19 PM
DavePlaysBass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CO
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by ffej
The original Rotosound swing bass were guaged:
46-63-80-102.
This is what Jaco used and would be closer to 45-105
than 40-100.
Ken Smith has a balanced set of steels that go 44-63-80-102. I am playing a set right now. They are a good steel string.

Dave
  #7  
Old 11-05-2008, 12:08 PM
babaseen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: 01824
Supporting Member
Roto's

Still believe Roto Swing Bass 66 are in a class by themselves IMHO
__________________
http://www.reverbnation.com/hipanonymous
"Do you know about 'cutting' the string?" Jaco to Marcus. My finger attack was soft and my notes weren't articulated clearly."
  #8  
Old 11-05-2008, 02:45 PM
Registered User

Endorsing Artist: Aguilar Amplification & LaBella Strings
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NYC
What I remember about the strings is that the silk ends were different on every string, he told me they were Rotosounds, I don't remember the order, but the colors were:

Red
Green
Yellow
Blue

I know this because after a basketball game in Molde, Norway (Late July '82). I went the band to the gig and got a set of used strings that I asked for backstage, they were wrapped and I ready for the trash ... I haven't seen those strings in years...
__________________
Easy,
RR
www.myspace.com/rrbass
  #9  
Old 11-06-2008, 10:30 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzbass64 View Post
Perhaps high-beam in 45-100 would be a good thing to try for me...But are the high-beam really different when compared to fat-beams ?
I know they are both stainless steel with round-core...This is why I have thought they are similar.So ?
High Beams are a bit more trebly than Fat Beams. Fat Beams are deeper sounding with more pronounced mids than Hi Beams.
Hi Beams have more of a scooped mid sound. Fat Beams are also smoother feeling but slightly higher tension.
__________________
You Ain't Got That Thing, If You Ain't Got That Swing!
  #10  
Old 11-06-2008, 10:35 AM
Eublet's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Supporting Member
Hi Beams would eat up a fretless board faster than most anything.
  #11  
Old 11-06-2008, 11:12 AM
narud's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: santa maria,california
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eublet View Post
Hi Beams would eat up a fretless board faster than most anything.
ive used hi beams and lo riders exclusively on my fretless f bass with no issues.
  #12  
Old 12-11-2009, 12:02 PM
babaseen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: 01824
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by ffej View Post
The original Rotosound swing bass were guaged:
46-63-80-102.
This is what Jaco used and would be closer to 45-105
than 40-100.
I'm not sure the information quoted by ffej is true.

From the John Entwhistle website (i.e., the man who helped James Howe conceive the Swing Bass 66) it states that the gauges were .045 -.105 (at least for the G and E) from 1966 to the 80's.
__________________
http://www.reverbnation.com/hipanonymous
"Do you know about 'cutting' the string?" Jaco to Marcus. My finger attack was soft and my notes weren't articulated clearly."
  #13  
Old 12-11-2009, 12:27 PM
4-string's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Norway
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by narud View Post
ive used hi beams and lo riders exclusively on my fretless f bass with no issues.
+1. Worry about fretboard wear if and when it happens. My fretless J has had ProSteels for the last couple of years.
__________________
Out of time - out of tune
  #14  
Old 12-11-2009, 01:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NY
Rotosound Swing bass 66 strings are THE sound. I think for me the DR Low-Riders are closer to it than Hi-Beams or Fat-Beams for me anyway.
  #15  
Old 12-11-2009, 01:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Between Chicago and Milwaukee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deep View Post
Rotosound Swing bass 66 strings are THE sound.
+1
I used DR's for a few years and although they were really good strings, they didn't have that sound. When I put a set of Rotosound Swing Bass strings back on my Rickenbacker 4001, I realised that I missed them. So now, that's all I will use.

Last edited by 4001 : 12-11-2009 at 01:27 PM.
  #16  
Old 02-05-2013, 08:27 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Send a message via MSN to camelspotter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deep View Post
Rotosound Swing bass 66 strings are THE sound. I think for me the DR Low-Riders are closer to it than Hi-Beams or Fat-Beams for me anyway.
DR Low-Riders are great when using the neck Pu and the tone all the way down.. great mid scooped jaco sound in my jazz with S.Duncun AntII pus.
Now i'm trying Rotos 66' 95-75-60-40 gauge. Tried on my fretted, on my fretless, great sounding, clear bottom end, not muddy but they lack midrange imho. tone all the way up goes way bright and trebly, all the way down with the neck PU but now i can't get that jaco or even better the Sinclair (caravan era) tone, i could nail with the DRs..
It's all a matter of taste.
I want to put samples and compare two in both fretted and fretless jazz basses.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Visit TalkBass on Facebook   Download our iOS app   Download our Android app

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:27 PM.




© 2012 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar too? Visit TalkGuitar.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.