|  | | 
04-23-2011, 11:59 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Hampshire | | | Labella Flats not as thumpy as Chromes?
Sign in to disble this ad
I recently put a set of Labella 760FM's on to my Mahogany Decade. On my Basswood Squier CV P I have a set of chromes that is at least 6 months old.
Given the differences in wood and the age of strings, I'm finding the Chromes must deader and thumpier than the Labellas, which seems to be the opposite of what I've heard. I've always read that Chromes are brighter than Labellas.
Is it just a matter of waiting for the Labellas to break in and eventually they'll match the tone of the chromes?
__________________ Clubs: New Hampshire Bassists #6 | Official Fender Precision Bass Club #888 | 
04-23-2011, 12:18 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Metro Detroit | | | I've had a set of LaBella 760FL on for about a year. They don't sound "thumpy" at all to me. They have a beautiful full sound. Having said that, the Chromes I tried were brighter sounding. They were also stiffer feeling.
I like LaBella's more, by far. They'll break in. I don't think there is a better sounding flatwound made, personally. But that's just my opinion. | 
04-23-2011, 12:20 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Quebec | | Quote:
Originally Posted by fourstringdrums I recently put a set of Labella 760FM's on to my Mahogany Decade. On my Basswood Squier CV P I have a set of chromes that is at least 6 months old.
Given the differences in wood and the age of strings, I'm finding the Chromes must deader and thumpier than the Labellas, which seems to be the opposite of what I've heard. I've always read that Chromes are brighter than Labellas.
Is it just a matter of waiting for the Labellas to break in and eventually they'll match the tone of the chromes? | Give them some time to break in. | 
04-23-2011, 12:29 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Hampshire | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Marton Give them some time to break in. | That's what I figured. I just wasn't sure of the differences in say a 6 month old set of Labellas and a 6 month old set of Chromes in terms of brightness/thump
__________________ Clubs: New Hampshire Bassists #6 | Official Fender Precision Bass Club #888 | 
04-23-2011, 01:04 PM
| | | | Interesting, I always thought Chromes sounded bass heavy in every clip I've heard. | 
04-24-2011, 03:35 AM
| | Dry and Heavy | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Swiss Alps | | | With 6 months on each the Chromes will still have more present high mids than the Labellas.
The Labellas will thump harder, no doubt about it. | 
04-24-2011, 03:55 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Pacific Wonderland | | | What gauges are people using on the Labellas?
__________________
"Pass the Peas" "Soul Brother Number One" BIG CAB CLUB member #170 and proud of it!...Not so much now that I'm old and fat! Oregon Bassist's Club member #46
| 
04-24-2011, 04:18 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Hampshire | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by DJ Bebop What gauges are people using on the Labellas? | I'm using the 49-109 FM set
__________________ Clubs: New Hampshire Bassists #6 | Official Fender Precision Bass Club #888 | 
04-24-2011, 04:53 AM
| | | | Well in 6 months, the chromes'll have a year... Unless your actually logging hours of playtime, that is. Lol.
__________________
Praise & Worship #803;Florida Bassists Club #168;
Ibanez Club #693;Bassists Who Drive Manual #67
| 
04-24-2011, 11:08 AM
| | Dry and Heavy | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Swiss Alps | | Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ Bebop What gauges are people using on the Labellas? | FL760 and Jamersons, i.e. .104 and .110 E strings respectively. | 
04-24-2011, 10:56 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Pacific Wonderland | | Quote:
Originally Posted by One Drop FL760 and Jamersons, i.e. .104 and .110 E strings respectively. | How do the Jamersons feel compared to the Chromes 40-100, stiffer?
__________________
"Pass the Peas" "Soul Brother Number One" BIG CAB CLUB member #170 and proud of it!...Not so much now that I'm old and fat! Oregon Bassist's Club member #46
| 
04-24-2011, 11:15 PM
| | Dry and Heavy | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Swiss Alps | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by DJ Bebop
How do the Jamersons feel compared to the Chromes 40-100, stiffer? | The only Chromes in that gauge I own are long scale ones on a short scale Harmony (due to the bridge design) so tension is a bit different, but in any case the tension and stiffness are radically higher with the Jamersons. I've never played a stiffer string than this set, in fact. | 
04-25-2011, 12:07 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Pacific Wonderland | | | Cool. How are they for one drop, One Drop?
__________________
"Pass the Peas" "Soul Brother Number One" BIG CAB CLUB member #170 and proud of it!...Not so much now that I'm old and fat! Oregon Bassist's Club member #46
Last edited by DJ Bebop : 04-25-2011 at 12:11 AM.
| 
04-25-2011, 01:47 AM
| | Dry and Heavy | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Swiss Alps | | Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ Bebop Cool. How are they for one drop, One Drop? | Good question! I've tried a lot of different ones, but my experience might be meaningless to you. Strings are so personal, just like voices are. I've noticed many bassists, especially ones that use flats, tend to end up with a tone that is similar to their singing voice, not surprising when you think about it. Fams and Macca are two good examples to my ears.
That said, I prefer Chromes or the old Fenders (I haven't heard the new ones yet) on a J for reggae, as the extra bite helps with note definition and gives a nice edge to the tone, and the high mids really sing. I go for an old school tone though, very far from the modern active and often synthy or subby tones you hear in a lot of modern reggae, especially live.
But the Jamersons have a sweet huge fundamental and a great vocal quality to the attack; I think if I played a P for reggae I might prefer them over anything else. | 
04-26-2011, 01:18 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Pacific Wonderland | | Quote:
Originally Posted by One Drop Good question! I've tried a lot of different ones, but my experience might be meaningless to you. Strings are so personal, just like voices are. I've noticed many bassists, especially ones that use flats, tend to end up with a tone that is similar to their singing voice, not surprising when you think about it. Fams and Macca are two good examples to my ears.
That said, I prefer Chromes or the old Fenders (I haven't heard the new ones yet) on a J for reggae, as the extra bite helps with note definition and gives a nice edge to the tone, and the high mids really sing. I go for an old school tone though, very far from the modern active and often synthy or subby tones you hear in a lot of modern reggae, especially live.
But the Jamersons have a sweet huge fundamental and a great vocal quality to the attack; I think if I played a P for reggae I might prefer them over anything else. | Thanks
__________________
"Pass the Peas" "Soul Brother Number One" BIG CAB CLUB member #170 and proud of it!...Not so much now that I'm old and fat! Oregon Bassist's Club member #46
| 
04-30-2011, 06:21 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South Florida | | | I currently use both Chromes 50-105 and 760FM, they're both about 6 months old or so. I can get either to be pretty thumpy or bright. I can dime the treble knob on my bass with the Labellas and still have a usable tone. The Chromes have a little more high/high mids, so the tone knob won't be quite so high. To answer your question, yes, I think you can give the Labellas some break in time, maybe the tone will be more to your liking.
__________________
Flatwounds and a flathead.
| 
04-30-2011, 06:30 PM
|  | Supporting Member | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: SATX by way of NOLA | | | Ive used both and find LaBella's MUCH thumpier than Chromes but YMMV.
__________________
Rickenbacker Club #444
"Keep the rock funky and the funk rocking"
-MJ
| 
04-30-2011, 06:58 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South Florida | | | My dilemma with bass playing right now is that I can't decide which I like better..haha.
__________________
Flatwounds and a flathead.
| 
04-30-2011, 07:42 PM
|  | I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize! | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Ottawa, Canada | | | I definitely find the LaBella's thumpier than the Chromes. Just give them some time to settle in. | 
05-17-2011, 06:14 AM
| | | | I am using both Chromes and Labella flats right now. On identical basses. I bet you could "break in" the Chromes for 10 years, and they would still never match the LaBella thump. Try this: Replace the Chrome A string on your Squire with the new LaBella A. Play it for a little while and tell us what you think. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |