Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Strings [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-02-2011, 11:26 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ohio
Labella Flatwounds 760fs and 760fm?

Sign in to disble this ad
In my quest for new flats I have been asking alot of questions about guages and deep sound from the d and g strings. I have learned that bigger guages isnt always better, but the brand you use. EVERYBODY keeps telling me that these are the darkest sounding strings and these are what I need to use.
Questions.
1. Do these need a break in period or are they dark from the start?
2. What size would work best for me? Are the 760fs deep enough or do I need the 760fm?
I use a pick when I play, they will be going on 2 of my p basses, and into my GK MB212
Im tired of harsh sounding D and G strings, and too much high end on those strings also.
Considering these are expensive I would rather get a better idea before buying them.

Last edited by shawshank72 : 01-02-2011 at 11:42 AM.
  #2  
Old 01-02-2011, 12:35 PM
MKoby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MD/Metro DC
GOLD Supporting Member
I have 760M set on a Pbass
They sound very good. (to me)

They are higher tension than the strings on my URB (Correlli medium)

Less tension than Fender or Rotosound flats.(of their heaviest strings--LaBellas have better dampening)


The lighter set will probably be fine.
__________________
Fender/Fender style fretless club #2
My bass is worth more than my CAR! (official club) #28, I.D.I.O.T. #51, U.S. Peavey Club Member #216, Mediocre Bassist Club #397, Fretless Club #513
  #3  
Old 01-03-2011, 06:52 AM
lmfreeman9's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Chicago
Supporting Member
I have used both but eventually found them to have too much tension and now use FLs. I never noticed a need for a break in period on these and found little difference between the two.
  #4  
Old 01-03-2011, 02:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
I don't know if they normally require a break in period but I will say my 760FLs sounded better as time went on...after a year I really liked the sound and loved the feel.

However, D broke and I kind of wanted to try something heavier. I just put some 760FMs on and they definitely have more tension, I'm kind of hoping they will loosen up a bit in time (like the 760FLs did). The tone of the 760FM is dead on for what I was looking for. The 760FLs weren't quite there.

...which means the 760FSs might be really good since they are in between
  #5  
Old 01-03-2011, 05:43 PM
markjazzbassist's Avatar
prefers electric miles davis
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Supporting Member
yes they need a solid month of about an hour or 2 a day to break in.

start with 760FS and if they aren't too tense or the sound isn't htere, then try the FM's, but those are like telephone cables. they are super tense and truss rod will need tweaked.
__________________
My Website

My Band
  #6  
Old 01-04-2011, 02:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ohio
Thank you all, its helped a ton.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:48 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.