|  | 
01-25-2009, 01:04 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Palm Harbor, Florida | | | Low tension, fat sounding strings?
Sign in to disble this ad
I like ligther gauged strings, and roundwounds. What are some good low tension, fat sounding options? thanks.
__________________
G&L L2000;Squier CV 60s P;Acoustic B200; "Music is the mediator between the spiritual and the sensual life." - Beethoven, Ludwig Van | 
01-25-2009, 01:44 PM
| | Bye Millen! Hello? | | Join Date: Apr 2000 Location: The Great Lakes State | | | Thomastik Infeld Jazz Rounds.
__________________
"Don't get your panties in an uproar!" ~ Bobby Thunderstorm
| 
01-25-2009, 02:02 PM
| | | | DR Sunbeams | 
01-25-2009, 02:02 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Palm Harbor, Florida | | | hah, well how about something that doesn't cost $50 per set?
edit: that was pointed at the TI jazz set
I have been wanting to try some DR strings for awhile. How are the Sunbeams compared to the low riders?
__________________
G&L L2000;Squier CV 60s P;Acoustic B200; "Music is the mediator between the spiritual and the sensual life." - Beethoven, Ludwig Van | 
01-25-2009, 02:04 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Kansas | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Slater Thomastik Infeld Jazz Rounds. | I second that | 
01-25-2009, 02:07 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Indiana, USA | | | DR Sunbeams are wonderful strings, IMO. They're fat, warm, and flexible, and they sound great for a long time. The Lo-Riders are higher tension and stiffer, although great-sounding too. | 
01-25-2009, 03:24 PM
|  | Paid to be here | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Orange County, California | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Bennett DR Sunbeams are wonderful strings, IMO. They're fat, warm, and flexible, and they sound great for a long time. The Lo-Riders are higher tension and stiffer, although great-sounding too. | I like both, but I'd suggest TI flats for really fat tone.
__________________ | 
01-25-2009, 03:30 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Metro Atlanta | | | Never played the TI's (wanted to, though, from everything I've heard about them), and they are expensive... And of course, as a rule, lighter gauge strings aren't gonna be as "fat" sounding. But I second the Sunbeam recommendation. Lower tension than the Lo-Riders and all the warmth and fatness of nickel. Great strings (I switched to 'em from Rotosounds... and I was a pretty big Roto fan).
Brian | 
01-25-2009, 03:37 PM
|  | Paid to be here | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Orange County, California | | Quote:
Originally Posted by OriginalCrash Never played the TI's (wanted to, though, from everything I've heard about them), and they are expensive... And of course, as a rule, lighter gauge strings aren't gonna be as "fat" sounding. But I second the Sunbeam recommendation. Lower tension than the Lo-Riders and all the warmth and fatness of nickel. Great strings (I switched to 'em from Rotosounds... and I was a pretty big Roto fan).
Brian | Yeah I was surprised myself given the guage, but they do have a nice fat warm tone. Sounds like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIU66uyE-h4
__________________ | 
01-25-2009, 03:46 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Seattle, Washington | | I third the TI Jazz Rounds
Lighter gauge strings ARE going to give you a fatter tone, in some ways. Because lighter gauge means lower tension, and lower tension means more fundamental tone. If you can adjust your playing and get used to the feel of lighter gauge strings, then you can have a super easy playing bass and a great warm, fat tone 
__________________ 'Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing,
Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before' http://www.youtube.com/gbagley | 
01-25-2009, 05:46 PM
|  | http://greenboy.us/forum/ greenboy designs: fEARful, bassic, dually, crazy88 etc | | Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: remote mountain cabin Montana | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Lokire Lighter gauge strings ARE going to give you a fatter tone, in some ways. Because lighter gauge means lower tension, and lower tension means more fundamental tone. | In spite of tons of experimentation and a tendency to favor low tension sets (currently using C25-G35-D50-A70-E90-B120taper D'Addario XL on one bass and 40-54-76-96-125 GHS Pressurewounds on another), I'm not convinced that it necessarily means more fundamental, since the lower tension allows more overtones to sustain due to ease of vibration. And analyzing the sound only as a static entity instead of realizing that there's both which partials dominate during attack, and which ones are doing well during sustain/decay seems to lead to a wrong understanding too.
Then, as well, I'm not convinced that MORE FUNDAMENTAL is necessarily percieved as "a fatter tone". To me (and this is rig dependent as the speaker cab especially filters the signal), most people associate a fatter tone as a lot of energy content in the octave, octave-and-fifth, and two-octaves overtones, and a couple of the other overtones just above those. Often the fundamental of the lower notes on lower-pitched strings especially isn't represented hardly at all by the cab[s] anyway!
Probably the only way to find this stuff out for one's own use is to try stuff out more than casually, and then switch things around now and again as a reaility check... | 
01-26-2009, 01:13 PM
| | Bye Millen! Hello? | | Join Date: Apr 2000 Location: The Great Lakes State | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Poor Tom hah, well how about something that doesn't cost $50 per set?
edit: that was pointed at the TI jazz set | Well, they just happen to be exactly what you described. 
__________________
"Don't get your panties in an uproar!" ~ Bobby Thunderstorm
| 
01-26-2009, 07:02 PM
|  | Running With Scissors since 1964 | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Michigan's U.P. | | I am fond of Detroit Flats from webstrings. They feel great, boom like thunder and are only 20 bucks a set. I also have DR flats on another bass but the Detroit Flats feel like they have lower tension. http://www.webstrings.com/flatwound_bass_strings.html
I have the medium set andf they are fantastic!
__________________ Don't ask me, I'm still trying to find the #@$#& "trust rod" on a bass! I would hesitate to use the phrase "very good bassist" in any association with my name | 
01-27-2009, 04:50 PM
|  | http://greenboy.us/forum/ greenboy designs: fEARful, bassic, dually, crazy88 etc | | Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: remote mountain cabin Montana | | Quote:
Originally Posted by greenboy analyzing the sound of a string only as a static entity instead of realizing that there's both which partials dominate during attack, and which ones are doing well during sustain/decay seems to lead to a wrong understanding too. | Check this thread out to get a better idea at what I'm trying to get at in the statement above, and look at the waterfall plot below of a 1st fretline low F's various components as time goes by: AMPS/Bass guitar waterfall plot: what this means to rigs  | 
01-27-2009, 04:59 PM
|  | http://greenboy.us/forum/ greenboy designs: fEARful, bassic, dually, crazy88 etc | | Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: remote mountain cabin Montana | | | By the way, the dark-sounding fretless bass that sample/graph was from had TI Jazz "Flats" on it at the time. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |