|  | | 
07-08-2007, 02:35 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Metro St. Louis | | | Marcus Miller Fatbeam Sig Set
Sign in to disble this ad
I just put these on my Millennium four. They are still very new, but I think I will really like them. Anybody else use the MM Sig Fatbeam set of DRs?
__________________
Vintage Yamaha & Peavey Fan!
G-K MB210, killer bang for the buck!
| 
07-08-2007, 02:40 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: NY | | | I have used them off and on with DR Hi-Beams on my Jazz Bass, and have just picked up a 6 string set to use on my MTD 635 for its next string change. I generally like them. They might be just a touch more fuller sounding than the hi-beams, though definitely similar. I would also say they have slightly darker tone than Hi-Beams. Not much, but just enough to notice if you have the ears for it. | 
07-08-2007, 02:40 PM
| | Notes we play > Gear we play them on | | Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Wisconsin | | | I used to use them (believe it or not) on my Marcus Miller signature bass. I think they were good strings, though I can't tell a _huge_ difference between them and hi beams. They're still great strings! | 
07-08-2007, 02:43 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: NY | | Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperDuck I used to use them (believe it or not) on my Marcus Miller signature bass. I think they were good strings, though I can't tell a _huge_ difference between them and hi beams. They're still great strings! | Yeah, even after I gave my little description one post up, I find myself thinking, am I just imagining a difference in tone based on the package contents? I'd be curious to know the construction or material differences between them and hi-beams, but there is no direct info from DR about that. Sometimes I wonder if there is any difference at all? | 
07-08-2007, 02:51 PM
| | Notes we play > Gear we play them on | | Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Wisconsin | | | It's a tough call to be sure... if there are any differences they are subtle. As long as the player is happy, though, I suppose that's all that matters! | 
07-08-2007, 02:55 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Orlando, FL | | | I've been using Fat Beams on and off. I like to try new strings, but I always come back to Fat Beams and Rotosounds.
__________________
Eric
TriadicalSounds.com
| 
07-08-2007, 03:03 PM
| | | | Ive used them...Like them alot (my favorite rounds so far). I got flats now for awhile.
__________________
Just groovin'...
Fretless Club Member #12
| 
07-08-2007, 03:16 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Metro St. Louis | | I see Fatbeams have quite a following! I have loved Hibeams since the mid 1990's. I just put a fresh set on my ATK305 too.
I have to let these Fatbeams set a day or two so I can use my D-tuner on my Millennium, and I look out. I think my tone will be great for the St. Louis area GTG. 
__________________
Vintage Yamaha & Peavey Fan!
G-K MB210, killer bang for the buck!
| 
07-08-2007, 08:23 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: From a place lower than low | | | Tony at DR told me that the Hi-Beams and the Fat-Beams use the same stainless steel on a round core but the Fat-Beams are wound even slower than the Hi-Beams. To my ears and hands, the Fat-Beams are much stiffer and have a more pronounced midrange and not as much sparkle in the highs. | 
07-08-2007, 08:37 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Dallas, Tx | | | I find the Fat Beams to be far less "brittle" in the highs out of the package than High Beams. I could never leave a set of High Beams on that guitar long enough to let them calm down. That being said, I have 4 four string basses and I've found that each of them reacts very differently to different strings. I have a different favorite string for each one. How confusing. | 
07-09-2007, 05:36 AM
| | | | I love these strings, they are my current favourites.
I use the light gauge btw which still produces a very meety sound. | 
07-09-2007, 09:26 AM
|  | What would Scooby do? | | Join Date: Apr 2000 Location: Livin' in the USA | | I use 'em on my MTD 535, sound great.
I tried to fit some on my Sadowsky yesterday, but it looks like the B string outer wrap will wind around the tuner. I don't think that is a good idea 
__________________
/ Alleva Coppolo / Ken Smith / Aguilar Alleva-Coppolo Fanboy #14 Sadowsky Fanboy #54 Aguilar Fanboy #117 | 
07-09-2007, 11:30 PM
| | Registered User DR Strings Employee | | | | | Marcus Miller uses the Fat Beams and Hi-Beams. Listen to the album M2 (M squared, not sure how to do superscripts), and you can clearly hear the difference between the two strings. He uses Hi-Beams for the first half and Fat Beams for teh second half (or the otehr way around, I can't remember off-hand).
But I'm glad you like them. Being an employee of DR, it's always great to hear positive feedback
__________________
1986 Fender Precision Bass, 3-Color Sunburst with DR Evergreens
| 
07-10-2007, 12:05 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Lansing, Michigan | | | I've found fat beams are keeping me with a happy tone much longer than the hi-beams. I was running through a set a week when I used them.
I love the tones of both but i'll choose life over initial spank any dang day if they sound similar. I have found though that the fats are getting me a "fat" tone so they are keepers.
__________________
"But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal:" Matthew 6:20
| 
07-10-2007, 04:10 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Northern California | | Quote:
Originally Posted by rsautrey Tony at DR told me that the Hi-Beams and the Fat-Beams use the same stainless steel on a round core but the Fat-Beams are wound even slower than the Hi-Beams. To my ears and hands, the Fat-Beams are much stiffer and have a more pronounced midrange and not as much sparkle in the highs. | Bingo. My experiences exactly. I really love Fat Beams on my Cirrus for fingerstyle playing.
__________________ "Dana's last name has been cited as an example of an aptronym, meaning that it is aptly suited to its owner. However, this is not the case, since Dana's instrument, the bass, is not strummed." | 
07-10-2007, 04:51 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Bowling Green, Ohio | | | best strings ever. | 
07-10-2007, 05:09 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: East Midlands, UK | | | I've got them on my Custom Shop Streamer at the moment, and I love them - they're an excellent mate to the Nordstrand MM pickup on there.
Is it my imagination, or do they seem just a little less tense than the same gauge Hi Beams? They just seem a little more easy going action-wise when I'm slapping, but still offer a perfect amount of resistance when digging in fingerstyle.
__________________
Warwick Streamer Jazzman 5 Custom Shop
Dean Edge Q4
Fender MIM Jazz
Boss ME-50B
Ashdown MAG 300H, MAG210T + MAG115 cabs
| 
07-10-2007, 07:37 AM
| | Registered User Manager: Bass People Sydney | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: sydney australia | | | these strings rock my world. i hve yet to find anything that i like anywhere near as much as these guys. i tried the bootzillas for a while, they were cool but i love those fat beams | 
07-11-2007, 10:22 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Metro St. Louis | | Quote:
Originally Posted by bassist 4 life best strings ever. | +1 They take the edge off the preamp on my Millennium which is mega-powerful. The slightly darker tone is perfect for active basses. My Millennium sounded perfect at rehearsal. I played my ATK305 with the Hi-Beams, and it really sounded a but tinny compared to the Millennium with the Fatbeams. Fortunately the treble on my ATK is smooth and when I turned it down, the tone very closely resembled the Fatbeams.
__________________
Vintage Yamaha & Peavey Fan!
G-K MB210, killer bang for the buck!
| 
07-13-2007, 07:30 PM
| | Registered User DR Strings Employee | | | | Quote:
Originally Posted by rsautrey Tony at DR told me that the Hi-Beams and the Fat-Beams use the same stainless steel on a round core but the Fat-Beams are wound even slower than the Hi-Beams. To my ears and hands, the Fat-Beams are much stiffer and have a more pronounced midrange and not as much sparkle in the highs. | Hey, I know Tony! He's a really good guy, knows a lot too.
Once again, Marcus used Hi-Beams on half of M squared and Fat Beams on the other half.
__________________
1986 Fender Precision Bass, 3-Color Sunburst with DR Evergreens
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |