Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Strings [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 04-16-2010, 08:23 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nashville
Send a message via AIM to stflbn
More Mid-Focused Stainless Roundwounds?

Sign in to disble this ad
I've been using ProSteels primarily over the past few months. I love the strings on most of my basses, but I've recently gotten a Reverend BH5 and would like to hear more mids out of this specific bass.

What are the stainless steel roundwounds out there that are less scooped and more mid focused while retaining the normal stainless clarity?


Currently I have a set of HiBeams on the bass and they seem better and 'close'

Thinking of trying:
SIT Power Steels
Sadowsky Steels
Dunlop Steels
Rotosounds

I was considering putting something like a EMG BTC Control in the bass in order to cut lows or highs in order to bump mids, but it seems a shame to mod this rare bass. Or use an external preamp with bass/treble cut or mid boost, but I think the bass is 'close' to what I'm hearing now.

Thoughts?

Crappy iPhone photo's. I'll do better photo's... promise.




.

Last edited by stflbn : 04-16-2010 at 08:29 AM.
  #2  
Old 04-16-2010, 11:25 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: detroit, MI, united states
Send a message via AIM to robb. Send a message via Skype™ to robb.
i think you should start out with la bella hard rockin' steel. this is what i use now after looking for a more balanced, mid-present sound from steel strings.

read the bass player review of strings. the SIT strings might also be something you'd like, based on their descriptions. i chose the la bella HRS because the pickups on my peavey cirrus are quite bright. you may want more high end, which the SIT (or even the sadowsky) should provide.

the reviews also cover how the strings feel. i don't have any issues playing la bella HRS, but the SIT and rotosound are rougher than the la bella and sadowsky.

robb.
__________________
warwick quadruplet > crest pro7200 > bergantino HT112/EX112
ampeg V4 > 80s carvin 115
  #3  
Old 04-16-2010, 02:27 PM
steamthief's Avatar
It's time for Dodger baseball!
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mentone Beach
Supporting Member
DR FatBeams or Lo-Riders. Sweet bass!
__________________
"I don't know karate, but I know ka-razor" - James Brown, The Payback
  #4  
Old 04-16-2010, 02:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nashville
Send a message via AIM to stflbn
I've got a set of Stainless Lo-Riders and SIT Powersteels coming to try.
  #5  
Old 04-17-2010, 06:14 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Stainless steel Lo-Rider

I put them on after using Hi-Beam for a year, and the tone was noticeably different in the mids.
__________________
Lakland Owner's Group #233
Official Ampeg Club #292
  #6  
Old 04-17-2010, 07:52 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: England
Rotosounds. They sound like they would suit, and nothing is like them in sound (very unique). Its always worth trying something new and different IMO, you could try most other makes out there and still not find the same sound as the Rotos, which maybe the sound your after.

They are a bit rougher than other strings, but I have used them for 2-3 years now with no fret issues, or even signs of them beginning. Your fingers will toughen up to the point you wont notice they are rough also. You can hear them on the Rotosound website.
__________________
British Bassist #94
  #7  
Old 04-17-2010, 08:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
the mid of sadowski are pretty nice and have a long life too, I hate the pro steels too scouped for me I like the bite the growl
__________________
Official Ampeg Club Member 180#
  #8  
Old 04-17-2010, 08:56 AM
mmbongo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Upstate, South Carolina
Supporting Member
DR LoRiders fo sho.
  #9  
Old 04-17-2010, 04:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NJ
Lo Riders if you like more tension, LaBella HRS if you like less
__________________
AKR

\m/

Last edited by Metal Mitch : 04-17-2010 at 04:37 PM.
  #10  
Old 04-17-2010, 07:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Warwick Black Lable. Very mid focused.
__________________
Medium Scale Club #27, Fender P-Bass Club #658, Fender Jazz Bass Club #619.
  #11  
Old 04-18-2010, 09:15 PM
elves r us
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Supporting Member
I think your idea of installing a preamp is best. Esp if you get one like EMG 3-band with selectable mid control. Or similiar 3-band with selectable mids. While cutting bass and treble might make mids more prominate, its not gonna help you accent mids as well as mid boost would with the center freq of choice for that. If you get a chance to. Play your bass thru a 10-20 band eq and play with all the midrange controls. Find that area of mid which when boosted is most pleasing to you. Also note which parts of the mids when boosted are annoying to you. Pick a 3-band preamp which avoids the center freqs you found annoying and go with one whose mid freq choices include that center freq or very close to it, that was most pleasing when boosted.

If nothing else get your hands on a multi effect bass processor that has at least 6 bands of eq, pref more. Or an amp head or combo with at least 3 ranges for mids.

The problem with the single choice for mids preamps is that it can just as easilly boost a part of the midrange you dont like boosted. Unless you know ahead of time what center freq you want. And choose preamp based on that for its mid section.

For mid rich strings though, I think thats part of what I dislike about daddario and elexir, the type of mid accent they have. But one of these might suit your needs well for that bass perhaps.
__________________
life for its own carnal pleasure. Bass: Jackson JS3. Guitars: BC Rich IT Warlock & BC Rich masterpeice Mockingbird shortscale. Zoom club#2. BC Rich club#26.
  #12  
Old 04-18-2010, 09:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nashville
Send a message via AIM to stflbn
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkstorm View Post
I think your idea of installing a preamp is best. Esp if you get one like EMG 3-band with selectable mid control. Or similiar 3-band with selectable mids. While cutting bass and treble might make mids more prominate, its not gonna help you accent mids as well as mid boost would with the center freq of choice for that. If you get a chance to. Play your bass thru a 10-20 band eq and play with all the midrange controls. Find that area of mid which when boosted is most pleasing to you. Also note which parts of the mids when boosted are annoying to you. Pick a 3-band preamp which avoids the center freqs you found annoying and go with one whose mid freq choices include that center freq or very close to it, that was most pleasing when boosted.
Onboard 3-band is NOT going to happen on this bass. (And I'm a big fan of 3-band for live use) I'm waffling on the idea of modding it to add a single knob 2-band with Bass/Treble cut in order to boost mids, but it's likely not going to happen. I think if a preamp happens it will be an external. The bass is one of 79 total made, and it's 'close' tonally. Drilling additional holes for more knobs isn't an option for this bass.

Also... just reserving one of the 3 presets on my RH450 head specifically for this bass, or making a drawing to reflect back on when needed for head EQ settings is also a strong possibility.
  #13  
Old 04-19-2010, 08:11 AM
pickles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Ventura, CA
Supporting Member
I'd try DR DDTs on that bass.
  #14  
Old 04-19-2010, 08:31 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nashville
Send a message via AIM to stflbn
Quote:
Originally Posted by pickles View Post
I'd try DR DDTs on that bass.

Drop tuning strings? Not sure I'll be able to convince myself to make that trial investment without hearing comparisons between them and other strings.
  #15  
Old 04-19-2010, 08:38 AM
pickles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Ventura, CA
Supporting Member
That's a huge marketing mistake from DR. The 45-125 set is perfect for normal tuning. They feel really similar to hi-beams but with a rounder, growlier sound and a much better low B. They do have a lot of beef in the low end, but its a lot of good material in that mid-low range vs the ultra deep extended lows of the prosteels. And the highs are quite a bit more mellow than hi-beam -- more mid-focused.

Somewhere between hi-beams and hard rockin steels.
  #16  
Old 04-19-2010, 08:41 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nashville
Send a message via AIM to stflbn
Cool. I'm wanting to retain highs though... not mellower highs.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:05 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.