Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Strings [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 10-13-2005, 06:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ithaca, NY
Rotosound 77's

Sign in to disble this ad
Has anybody played them? I'm going to pick up another fretless (my old one is FUBAR) and want to know how they sound. Are they bright? Do they sound vibrato as well as roundwounds? Most importantly, are they good for harmonics? I play Roto 66's on my fretted bass (and on my old fretless before it was destroyed), so if anyone can offer some comparison to the 66's that would be fantastic.

Thanks,
Dave
__________________
Bass>All Reals
  #2  
Old 10-14-2005, 12:01 AM
bassybill's Avatar
No need to ask, he's a smooth...
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Midlands UK
Supporting Member
As you seem to realise, the 77s are flats and the 66s are rounds, so comparing them is a bit chalk and cheese, really. I mainly use 66s on fretted basses myself and love them, but I have a Jazz with 77s on for when I want that flatwound clunky sound. But they aren't really a substitute for rounds, they're too different really.

Have you thought of the Rotosound Solo Bass pressure wound strings? They should be pretty close to rounds in tone but have a smoother finish which should help minimise wear on a fretless board. I have a set waiting to go on my fretless Jazz - haven't tried them yet as the Dean Markely Fretmasters I've got on there are lasting really well, but these cost a lot more than Rotosounds, at least here in the UK. They're another good option for fretless though; roundwound strings, but burnished over the fingerboard section for a smoother finish (and therefore reduced wear).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SBassman View Post
Man, I'd soil myself playing in a band like that.
  #3  
Old 10-14-2005, 08:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Supporting Member

Rotosound 77 have more of a treble sound for flats.
TI-flats have more meds.
Labella-flats more bass.
I've used all three.
I like the Labella for my fretted P-bass.
TI- for my fretless P-bass.
Roto's for my fretted Jazz.
  #4  
Old 10-14-2005, 08:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Supporting Member

Rotosound 77 have more of a treble sound for flats.
TI-flats have more meds.
Labella-flats more bass.
I've used all three.
I like the Labella's for my fretted P-bass.
TI- for my fretless P-bass.
Roto's for my fretted Jazz.
  #5  
Old 10-14-2005, 09:24 AM
Tired_Thumb
Guest
 
I use them, .30-.100 on my 5 string fretless. They're somewhat of a unique beast, but they're great if you're the type of player for them. I play quite a bit of fast fingerstyle grooving and speed metal (or should I say "half speed"? ), and the stiffness in the strings actually works in my favor given my fingers tend to get tangled up in softer strings. I've also noticed they have a fairly clean attack also compared to some other strings (for me, that is). They are somewhat of a low output string, but that can be solved by turning the volume up.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:19 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.