Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Strings [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 09-25-2011, 07:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rotosound Piano Strings and Drop A Tuning

Sign in to disble this ad
So here's the thing. I just bought the Rotosound Piano string design (PSD) strings for my 5 string Schecter. On my Schecter I like to have the B string tuned down to A.

For the Rotosound PSD stings you have to leave between 3 to 9 mm (ideally 6 mm) of the exposed core between the bridge saddle and the winding. Here's the guide: http://www.rotosound.com/PSD_guide.pdf

Now here's my theory. Because I want to have the B sting tuned down to A, I'm thinking that I should only have the minimum 3 mm of the exposed core to help reduce the tension difference between that string and the others. I'm thinking this will help because less exposed core = more string winding = more string mass between the nut and bridge. If I'm correct, more mass means higher tension, causing the string tuned down to A not be so floppy.

Does this make sense? What do you guys think? Thanks!
__________________
WANTED: Free Gear!
  #2  
Old 09-25-2011, 08:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada!
Hmmm...not sure myself, but interested in finding out....so subscribing to this thread.

I do love the PSD's....you need a bit of time to put them on, 1st time took me about 45 mins, but holy moly are they ever awesome!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muaguana View Post
No ****, Sherlock? And do you have any more Capt. Obvious one-liners to share that contribute nothing to the discussion at hand?
  #3  
Old 09-25-2011, 08:17 PM
SLaPiNFuNK's Avatar
Registered User

Owner: BassStringsOnline.com
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LA California
Send a message via AIM to SLaPiNFuNK
GOLD Supporting Member
I am not 100% sure how much of a difference that would make with the PSD strings...

The answer may be figured out by using a set of exposed core strings on a bridge that has more length between ball and the saddle and the same strings on another bass with less distance between the ball and the saddle.

I think the difference will be will be very minimal compared to the reduced tension of +/- 7lbs by d-tuning the string though...
__________________
Get strings at BassStringsOnline.com
Check out the BassStringsOnline Official Bazaar Thread!
Dig inside the Bass String Bin for some special deals!
  #4  
Old 09-25-2011, 08:26 PM
SLaPiNFuNK's Avatar
Registered User

Owner: BassStringsOnline.com
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LA California
Send a message via AIM to SLaPiNFuNK
GOLD Supporting Member
Tension is being reduced by nearly 20% to detune to from B-A... adding an extra 3mm of string windings will be adding .5% more mass roughly?
__________________
Get strings at BassStringsOnline.com
Check out the BassStringsOnline Official Bazaar Thread!
Dig inside the Bass String Bin for some special deals!
  #5  
Old 09-25-2011, 08:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
hmm interesting.. I just hope to get a good tone on that string tuned to A
__________________
WANTED: Free Gear!
  #6  
Old 09-25-2011, 08:46 PM
SLaPiNFuNK's Avatar
Registered User

Owner: BassStringsOnline.com
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LA California
Send a message via AIM to SLaPiNFuNK
GOLD Supporting Member
I think the string will still sound good. I would string it up to the spec's they recommend. It will just not as tight of a string as if it were a B.

But hey its worth a shot!

Personally I have only put together a 4 string set so far...
__________________
Get strings at BassStringsOnline.com
Check out the BassStringsOnline Official Bazaar Thread!
Dig inside the Bass String Bin for some special deals!
  #7  
Old 09-25-2011, 08:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Interesting theory, and yes i think it will very slightly increase the tension at A. It's a good idea to minimise the length of exposed core anyway since this results in a more harmonic tone (because the string is closer to being full gauge from nut to saddle, and therefore vibrates more like a non-tapered string).

In my experience A needs at least a .145 but that's another subject. It will be floppy.
  #8  
Old 09-25-2011, 09:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
i would love to get a thicker gauge, but unfortunately the .130 is the only gauge it comes in. I wonder if this "piano tone" will be preserved even when tuned down.
__________________
WANTED: Free Gear!
  #9  
Old 10-01-2011, 04:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
So a put them on my bass a couple days ago and they sound AMAZING. They give the exact tone I was looking for.

Putting them on is a huge pain though. After I would adjust the intonation, I had to take them off and readjust the ends to keep them at the perfect 6 mm of exposed core. That was the frustrating part. I ended up not caring if it was exactly 6 mm. I just made sure it had the minimum of 3 mm but no more than the maximum of 9 mm.

About the drop A tuning, I decided that the tension change with different length of exposed core was so minute and unnoticeable that I decided not to worry about it. It sounds great but it is a bit floppy, oh well.

Despite the pain of setting them up right, I think they're definitely worth it, especially if you're into bright tones!
__________________
WANTED: Free Gear!
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:10 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.