Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Strings [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 10-20-2008, 10:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Singapore
String tension VS tone VS string gauge

Sign in to disble this ad
Hi all, I did a search on this, but couldn't find any results, so pardon me if this has been asked before..

I was playing my P Bass today, and I decided to randomly remove my Rotosound Monel Flat Wound (RS77LD, 0.45-.105) and restring it with my old, somewhat dead stock Fender strings, as I'd forgotten what they sounded like. Then, I realised some things.

---WOW, the stock Fender strings (.40-.100) were SO much easier to fret due to lower tension. I was playing faster and smoother than ever.

---I knew that action would be lowered when using thinner gauges, but I could really feel the difference as I played, and I liked the low action.

---I really liked the growly bright tone from the round wounds, even if they were somewhat dead strings.

However, I quickly changed back to my flat wounds, because:

--- I missed the "thump" from my flatwounds.

--- I felt the round wounds sounded too "piano-like". Not that there's anything wrong with that; I just like to play hard and put emphasis on attack, so the bright tones did not help me.

--- I was more used to the heavier gauge of the Rotosounds.

When I did a search, I realised that many of you felt that Rotosounds were high tension. I guess I'd agree.

Now, I was wondering, since most of you are more experienced with strings..

Is there a set of strings which is .45-.105 gauge, but with low tension similar to a .40-.100 gauge, which can be set up with low action? I also want these strings to have the thump and attack of flat wounds, yet possess the growly-brightness of round wounds..

I'm thinking pressure wound is the way to go here? Oh yeah, I play my P Bass for classic hard rock and classic heavy metal, i.e. Iron Maiden and the such. I really dig Steve Harris' tone and Duff Mckagan's too, so that would explain why I chose Rotosound at first..

Well, sorry that this post is long, and I'm even more sorry if everything I asked for can't possibly be found in one set of strings..

Peace.
__________________
Squier Owner's Club / P Bass Club #649 / The Passive Club #63
  #2  
Old 10-20-2008, 10:25 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nashville
Send a message via AIM to stflbn
Personally I feel that higher tension strings allow lower action than low tension strings do. Less movement & tighter vibration of the higher tension strings allow them to be lower to the fretboard.

Or maybe i'm not understanding what you're saying.
  #3  
Old 10-20-2008, 10:29 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Singapore
Quote:
Originally Posted by stflbn View Post
Personally I feel that higher tension strings allow lower action than low tension strings do. Less movement & tighter vibration of the higher tension strings allow them to be lower to the fretboard.

Or maybe i'm not understanding what you're saying.
Really? I could achieve a lower action on the .40-100s for some reason. Also when I lower the action on the Rotosound Flats too much, there's far too much clanging. I tend to like some clang, but when every single note results in a loud clang, it irritates me.
__________________
Squier Owner's Club / P Bass Club #649 / The Passive Club #63
  #4  
Old 10-20-2008, 10:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nashville
Send a message via AIM to stflbn
That's more of a technique issue than anything. DIfferent strings give different amounts of Clang and CLack.
  #5  
Old 10-20-2008, 10:35 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
There are two different things going on here. If you switch to lower tension strings on a wood-necked bass, your action will become lower because there is less pull on the neck.

However, to truly compare, you'd have to turn the truss rod to compensate for the lower tension. I believe this is what Stflbn is talking about, and I agree: I use relatively low-tension flats, and I like the action a bit higher so the string has "room to vibrate." However, because the strings are lower tension, the action still feels "comfortable and easy" even though it's not "low."

I am a big fan of the TI Jazz Flats and would encourage you to try them if you're looking for the perfect set of strings. However, string choice is very much a matter of personal preference, so....
__________________
mush-a-boom-boom
  #6  
Old 10-20-2008, 11:11 AM
Mastermold's Avatar
Paid to be here
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Orange County, California
Supporting Member
I just put a set of TI flats on my '57 reissue P-bass, replaced the DR Hi-Beams I had. So far I'm diggin them, although the lighter tension required a little higher action.
__________________
  #7  
Old 11-09-2008, 03:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Singapore
I realise that I have posted this late, but I forgot to thank you guys for your input.

So.. thanks guys!

I bought a set of Rotosound Swing Bass 66 strings by the way. I really like the growly, bright stainless steel round wound tone. Sounds really fierce when I pump up the mids.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.