Quote:
Originally Posted by johno697 My questions:
1. Anyone have experience with the Taylor & the Thomastiks |
Not personally--I've played the Taylor, but only know the Thomastik Acousticores by reputation.
Quote:
|
2. Shouldn't Thomastik make a similar gage to the other manufacturers to avoid the need for drastic trussrod adjustments?
|
Thomastiks are very unique strings, designed for a particular sound and feel. That is the reason they're made the way they are, and that's why people tend to either love 'em or hate 'em.
Should Thomastik compromise their string design just so people won't have to adjust their truss rods? Isn't that what truss rods are for--to let the bass accommodate different string gauges and tensions?
Quote:
|
3. Is it worth the cost to convert the bass to the Thomastiks?
|
Only you can answer that. Thomastik's are pretty expensive, but what "cost" is there, aside from the cost of the strings themselves? Truss rod adjustments are really
not something that requires a trained guitar tech, just an allen wrench and a bit of care a patience.
But the real question is, what is it that you're hoping to gain by changing from your current strings to the Thomastiks? Are there specific charactistics you're looking for that the Chromes don't have, or are you just considering it because you've heard that Thomastiks are "the thing"?
Quote:
|
4. will the big difference in gage & tension affect unplugged volume?
|
From my experience with things like "silk and steel' strings on acoustic guitars, I'd have to say, yes, definitely.
Less tension and less vibrating mass to move the top means less volume, and unplugged volume isn't exactly the Taylor's strong point to begin with. Remember, the Thomastik Acousticores are really optimized for producing great
amplified acoustic tone, to get the best sound out of a piezo pickup on an instument like the Turner Rennaisance bass.
Mike