Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Strings [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 03-24-2008, 02:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NY
What makes DR Fat Beams different from DR Hi-Beams?

Sign in to disble this ad
What makes DR Fat Beams different from DR Hi-Beams other than Marcus Miller being on the package and the slightly higher price tag?

DR seems to have no problem explaining what materials, core shapes, and construction techniques go into all of their other strings that make the different, but strangely don't go into detail about Fat Beams. I've used Hi-beams and Fat Beams interchangably for a while now, and while I'd like to think I hear a difference, I'm not sure I could prove it. Any thoughts?
__________________
My Bass Gear Pics & Info
  #2  
Old 03-24-2008, 02:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Different gauges for the windings, maybe.
  #3  
Old 03-24-2008, 03:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NY
Anybody else want to take a guess?
__________________
My Bass Gear Pics & Info
  #4  
Old 03-24-2008, 05:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Highlands Ranch, Colorado
have fat and hi beams in my hand right now...

no difference in winding gauges.

Hi-Beams have MR-45, fat beams MM-45 (No clue what it means)

It could very well be just bogus marketing.... when i put my hi-beams on my p-bass I will compare their color to the fats
  #5  
Old 03-24-2008, 06:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by RapierSix View Post
have fat and hi beams in my hand right now...

no difference in winding gauges.

Hi-Beams have MR-45, fat beams MM-45 (No clue what it means)

It could very well be just bogus marketing.... when i put my hi-beams on my p-bass I will compare their color to the fats
Not the overall, but the individual winding wires in that go onto the string. A different combination could, in theory, create a different tone.
  #6  
Old 03-25-2008, 10:29 AM
Caca de Kick's Avatar
Sponsored by Jagermeister
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle / Tacoma
Supporting Member
I can't tell any difference at all. I'll buy whichever ones are sitting on the rack at the store (MR45 and MM45), so I have both types strung up on my basses right now, and couldn't tell you which was which.
  #7  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Highlands Ranch, Colorado
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parabolic Box View Post
Not the overall, but the individual winding wires in that go onto the string. A different combination could, in theory, create a different tone.
Both of their windings are the same... core, wrap 1, and wrap 2... all same gauge/width

only things I can see making em different is winding speed, coating, or actual chemical make up
  #8  
Old 03-25-2008, 06:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Though I wonder about the argument of whether winding speed can make that much of a difference. (ie. Would a machine wrapping a sandwich slowly create a different package that a machine wrapping it quickly?) Maybe they're different alloys if not different gauges.

Personally, I think they're the same strings.
  #9  
Old 03-26-2008, 01:05 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Birmingham, AL
bought a set of hi beams and hated them. didnt like the tone and the strings felt floppy. put on a set of fat beams and loved them. more growl, much better tension. even when detuned a full step, the fat beams feel and sound better.
  #10  
Old 03-26-2008, 07:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Supporting Member
"What makes DR Fat Beams different from DR Hi-Beams other than Marcus Miller being on the package and the slightly higher price tag?"

Here's an idea: Why don't you ask the people at DR Strings?
  #11  
Old 03-26-2008, 08:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdombrow View Post
"What makes DR Fat Beams different from DR Hi-Beams other than Marcus Miller being on the package and the slightly higher price tag?"

Here's an idea: Why don't you ask the people at DR Strings?
Here's an idea: how about trying to add positively to the conversation?
You also seem to have forgotten to include my smilie face and the end of that quote. That was strategically placed there to show that the question I posed was kind of "tongue in cheek".

My question is valid and I posed it to the tb public just like thousands of other people pose questions about virtually all other gear, strings, etc. I was looking for a response from actual people that use both of these DR strings sets, to see what differences they perceive if any. As mentioned, I use DR Hi-Beams and Fat Beams all the time. They are my go-to string sets. Your post in this thread is not appreciated by me. It seems my "ignore" list will grow once more this evening.
__________________
My Bass Gear Pics & Info

Last edited by Tony G : 03-26-2008 at 08:03 PM.
  #12  
Old 03-26-2008, 08:11 PM
jasper383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Durham NC
Supporting Member
I had Hi Beams and Fat Beams on the same bass back-to-back a couple years ago. Same gauge, everything.

I thought I noticed a little more mids with the Fat Beams, and a little more scoop with the Hi Beams. The Hi Beams felt, I thought, a little more flexible, and a little more "rolly" under my fingers.

It could have been real, or just my mind thinking "fat" when I had the Fat Beams on. Or maybe it was the Bass Player review that said the Fat Beams had more mids.

A lot of factors at work, and I fear marketing mumbo jumbo might actually be the correct answer.
  #13  
Old 03-26-2008, 09:25 PM
TSanders's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbus, Georgia
Send a message via AIM to TSanders
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdombrow View Post
"What makes DR Fat Beams different from DR Hi-Beams other than Marcus Miller being on the package and the slightly higher price tag?"

Here's an idea: Why don't you ask the people at DR Strings?
Yeah, I mean why would he want to talk about bass string in the strings forum of an online bass forum? What nerve.

Like DR is gonna come out and say, "theres no difference, its just marketing".
__________________
Travis
  #14  
Old 03-27-2008, 08:59 AM
pickles's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Ventura, CA
Supporting Member
No idea, but they are different. To me the fat beams are half way in between hi beams and lo riders. I prefer hi beams.
  #15  
Old 03-27-2008, 09:34 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: st. marys, ga
looking at the catalog, the hi beams are 'tite fit stainless steel on a round core' whereas the fat beams are 'stainless steel on a round core' ...they seem to go out of their way to say 'tite fit' or not in their string descriptions...that was the only difference i saw...i have no idea what tite fit means
__________________
david black

24 empty missile tubes, a mushroom cloud and it's Miller Time.

Chief Gunner of the Good Ship Castelo

Seven Against Thebes
Listen to 7AT on myspace!
Signs of Life
  #16  
Old 03-27-2008, 09:55 AM
KJung's Avatar
GOLD Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sheboygan, WI
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by neptoon View Post
looking at the catalog, the hi beams are 'tite fit stainless steel on a round core' whereas the fat beams are 'stainless steel on a round core' ...they seem to go out of their way to say 'tite fit' or not in their string descriptions...that was the only difference i saw...i have no idea what tite fit means
I just played a bass yesterday with the Marcus Fatbeams installed. I had never tried these strings. The above makes sense... the Fatbeams seem just a touch rougher to the hands than the very smooth, almost Nickel feeling Hi Beams. As far as I could tell (different bass, so hard to exactly know), the tone and tension felt pretty darn close.
__________________
Ken's YouTube clips: http://www.youtube.com/Kjungbass
  #17  
Old 03-27-2008, 10:03 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: st. marys, ga
i remember when i got my curbow rockwood 6 string, it had fat beams on it...i remember them feeling quite coarse, and it turned me off to dr strings, despite the nice feel and tone...if the feel of those strings isn't something that's characteristic of dr strings in general, i may have to give them another shot
__________________
david black

24 empty missile tubes, a mushroom cloud and it's Miller Time.

Chief Gunner of the Good Ship Castelo

Seven Against Thebes
Listen to 7AT on myspace!
Signs of Life
  #18  
Old 03-27-2008, 11:12 AM
jasper383's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Durham NC
Supporting Member
I emailed DR to get their answer. They seem like a customer friendly company.

We'll see.
  #19  
Old 03-27-2008, 11:24 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cerritos, California
Send a message via AIM to xkimsungminx
Interesting, I'd like to know this as well.
__________________
Alleva Coppolo Club Member #20
MTD USA Club Member #25
Alleva Coppolo LG5 D.N. CAOJ//Thunderfunk TFB550-B//Epifani UL410 Series 1

MTD #1651 is gone :crying:
Roscoe SKB-3005 #5714 will be missed!
  #20  
Old 03-27-2008, 06:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
The components are identical. The difference is the winding speed.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 PM.




Copyright ©2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.