|  | | 
03-24-2008, 02:03 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: NY | | | What makes DR Fat Beams different from DR Hi-Beams?
Sign in to disble this ad
What makes DR Fat Beams different from DR Hi-Beams other than Marcus Miller being on the package and the slightly higher price tag?
DR seems to have no problem explaining what materials, core shapes, and construction techniques go into all of their other strings that make the different, but strangely don't go into detail about Fat Beams. I've used Hi-beams and Fat Beams interchangably for a while now, and while I'd like to think I hear a difference, I'm not sure I could prove it. Any thoughts? | 
03-24-2008, 02:11 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada | | | Different gauges for the windings, maybe. | 
03-24-2008, 03:11 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: NY | | | Anybody else want to take a guess? | 
03-24-2008, 05:11 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Highlands Ranch, Colorado | | | have fat and hi beams in my hand right now...
no difference in winding gauges.
Hi-Beams have MR-45, fat beams MM-45 (No clue what it means)
It could very well be just bogus marketing.... when i put my hi-beams on my p-bass I will compare their color to the fats | 
03-24-2008, 06:02 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada | | Quote:
Originally Posted by RapierSix have fat and hi beams in my hand right now...
no difference in winding gauges.
Hi-Beams have MR-45, fat beams MM-45 (No clue what it means)
It could very well be just bogus marketing.... when i put my hi-beams on my p-bass I will compare their color to the fats | Not the overall, but the individual winding wires in that go onto the string. A different combination could, in theory, create a different tone. | 
03-25-2008, 10:29 AM
|  | Sponsored by Jagermeister | | Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Seattle / Tacoma | | | I can't tell any difference at all. I'll buy whichever ones are sitting on the rack at the store (MR45 and MM45), so I have both types strung up on my basses right now, and couldn't tell you which was which. | 
03-25-2008, 06:36 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Highlands Ranch, Colorado | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Parabolic Box Not the overall, but the individual winding wires in that go onto the string. A different combination could, in theory, create a different tone. | Both of their windings are the same... core, wrap 1, and wrap 2... all same gauge/width
only things I can see making em different is winding speed, coating, or actual chemical make up | 
03-25-2008, 06:50 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada | | | Though I wonder about the argument of whether winding speed can make that much of a difference. (ie. Would a machine wrapping a sandwich slowly create a different package that a machine wrapping it quickly?) Maybe they're different alloys if not different gauges.
Personally, I think they're the same strings. | 
03-26-2008, 01:05 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Birmingham, AL | | | bought a set of hi beams and hated them. didnt like the tone and the strings felt floppy. put on a set of fat beams and loved them. more growl, much better tension. even when detuned a full step, the fat beams feel and sound better. | 
03-26-2008, 07:36 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Colorado Springs, CO | | "What makes DR Fat Beams different from DR Hi-Beams other than Marcus Miller being on the package and the slightly higher price tag?"
Here's an idea: Why don't you ask the people at DR Strings?  | 
03-26-2008, 08:00 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: NY | | Quote:
Originally Posted by jdombrow "What makes DR Fat Beams different from DR Hi-Beams other than Marcus Miller being on the package and the slightly higher price tag?"
Here's an idea: Why don't you ask the people at DR Strings?  | Here's an idea: how about trying to add positively to the conversation? 
You also seem to have forgotten to include my smilie face and the end of that quote. That was strategically placed there to show that the question I posed was kind of "tongue in cheek".
My question is valid and I posed it to the tb public just like thousands of other people pose questions about virtually all other gear, strings, etc. I was looking for a response from actual people that use both of these DR strings sets, to see what differences they perceive if any. As mentioned, I use DR Hi-Beams and Fat Beams all the time. They are my go-to string sets. Your post in this thread is not appreciated by me. It seems my "ignore" list will grow once more this evening.
Last edited by Tony G : 03-26-2008 at 08:03 PM.
| 
03-26-2008, 08:11 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Durham NC | | | I had Hi Beams and Fat Beams on the same bass back-to-back a couple years ago. Same gauge, everything.
I thought I noticed a little more mids with the Fat Beams, and a little more scoop with the Hi Beams. The Hi Beams felt, I thought, a little more flexible, and a little more "rolly" under my fingers.
It could have been real, or just my mind thinking "fat" when I had the Fat Beams on. Or maybe it was the Bass Player review that said the Fat Beams had more mids.
A lot of factors at work, and I fear marketing mumbo jumbo might actually be the correct answer. | 
03-26-2008, 09:25 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Columbus, Georgia | | Quote:
Originally Posted by jdombrow "What makes DR Fat Beams different from DR Hi-Beams other than Marcus Miller being on the package and the slightly higher price tag?"
Here's an idea: Why don't you ask the people at DR Strings?  | Yeah, I mean why would he want to talk about bass string in the strings forum of an online bass forum? What nerve.
Like DR is gonna come out and say, "theres no difference, its just marketing".
__________________
Travis
| 
03-27-2008, 08:59 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2000 Location: Ventura, CA | | | No idea, but they are different. To me the fat beams are half way in between hi beams and lo riders. I prefer hi beams. | 
03-27-2008, 09:34 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: st. marys, ga | | looking at the catalog, the hi beams are 'tite fit stainless steel on a round core' whereas the fat beams are 'stainless steel on a round core' ...they seem to go out of their way to say 'tite fit' or not in their string descriptions...that was the only difference i saw...i have no idea what tite fit means  | 
03-27-2008, 09:55 AM
|  | GOLD Supporting Member | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Sheboygan, WI | | Quote:
Originally Posted by neptoon looking at the catalog, the hi beams are 'tite fit stainless steel on a round core' whereas the fat beams are 'stainless steel on a round core' ...they seem to go out of their way to say 'tite fit' or not in their string descriptions...that was the only difference i saw...i have no idea what tite fit means  | I just played a bass yesterday with the Marcus Fatbeams installed. I had never tried these strings. The above makes sense... the Fatbeams seem just a touch rougher to the hands than the very smooth, almost Nickel feeling Hi Beams. As far as I could tell (different bass, so hard to exactly know), the tone and tension felt pretty darn close. | 
03-27-2008, 10:03 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: st. marys, ga | | | i remember when i got my curbow rockwood 6 string, it had fat beams on it...i remember them feeling quite coarse, and it turned me off to dr strings, despite the nice feel and tone...if the feel of those strings isn't something that's characteristic of dr strings in general, i may have to give them another shot | 
03-27-2008, 11:12 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Durham NC | | | I emailed DR to get their answer. They seem like a customer friendly company.
We'll see. | 
03-27-2008, 11:24 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Cerritos, California | | Interesting, I'd like to know this as well. 
__________________
Alleva Coppolo Club Member #20
MTD USA Club Member #25
Alleva Coppolo LG5 D.N. CAOJ//Thunderfunk TFB550-B//Epifani UL410 Series 1
MTD #1651 is gone :crying:
Roscoe SKB-3005 #5714 will be missed!
| 
03-27-2008, 06:23 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Long Island, NY | | | The components are identical. The difference is the winding speed. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |