Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Strings [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #21  
Old 11-17-2006, 08:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: monterey bay area, ca
50-70-85-100

Sign in to disble this ad
i vote for 50-70-85-100-least would be interesting to try.
  #22  
Old 11-17-2006, 08:46 PM
seanm's Avatar
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Send a message via AIM to seanm Send a message via Yahoo to seanm
GOLD Supporting Member
Before I got rid of my short and medium scale basses I used 45-100 long scale Chrome flats. They worked very well.

My main gigging bass has 43-104 (LaBella 760FL flats).

My backup bass currently has 65-115 (Rotosound tape wounds).
I will probably be swapping these out for 45-105 (LaBella 760FS).

My rock bass has 50-105 (Chromes flats).
__________________
The Rippers
  #23  
Old 11-17-2006, 10:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Missoula, MT
Different strings for different basses.

My Jazz gets .050-.110.

My P gets .050-.105 flats.
__________________
"Mathematicians make propositions and demand that everyone agree with them. That's because mathematicians are bigots." -Justin Shaddock
  #24  
Old 11-17-2006, 10:38 PM
...Bluesin' and Funkin'
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Send a message via MSN to Jazzin'
Now I'm thinking of changing to 45-100. It sounds like a good idea. I'll give it a shot with my next set of strings.
__________________
Fender Dlx Jaguar Std Jazz Fretless Am Dlx Precision Kustom GrooveBass1200 Avatar B210neo B212
Questionable Quintet
  #25  
Old 11-18-2006, 10:48 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Florida
I got 45-100's because I thought it would reduce tension on my stock Fender neck and keep the wood from bowing up. Is this a valid theory? Does the .05 (or whatever) less heaviness make a difference?
__________________
jakenewcomb@hotmail.com
  #26  
Old 11-18-2006, 12:10 PM
seanm's Avatar
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Send a message via AIM to seanm Send a message via Yahoo to seanm
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake
I got 45-100's because I thought it would reduce tension on my stock Fender neck and keep the wood from bowing up. Is this a valid theory? Does the .05 (or whatever) less heaviness make a difference?
There are too many variables. I think the only safe statement is that within the same make and model of string, the larger the string the more tension.

It sounds more like you needed a truss rod adjustment.
__________________
The Rippers
  #27  
Old 11-18-2006, 11:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Florida
My Fender's neck was never bowing or having any problems, I just thought to ask for smaller gauges (45-100) when it was set up to prevent any problems. When I just replaced the Boomers I had on there, I put Lo-Riders on in the same gauge. My action could use a little adjustment, it buzzes a little, but I tend to play very soft with a lot of amp volume so the buzzes aren't bugging me too much.
__________________
jakenewcomb@hotmail.com
  #28  
Old 11-19-2006, 12:05 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake George, NY
Send a message via AIM to Daytona955i
I like .65, .85, .105, .125.

The top 4 strings of a DR hi-beams 5 string set.
__________________
TBC AP400->Ampeg SVP-Pro->Crown XLS402->SWR Goliath Senior
  #29  
Old 11-21-2006, 11:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
can i use the 45-100 to a bass guitar with a 33 inches scale length(nut to bridge)?...will it loose some tone clarity?
  #30  
Old 11-21-2006, 12:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
nut to saddle i mean...
  #31  
Old 02-08-2008, 08:58 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
ive always used 45-100 on my jazz basses for years. never had a problem with them. i used fenders nickel rounds and now use EB super slinkys. but i get all the dynamics i want with 45-100. simon gallup pick tone or big thick low end finger stuff. seems to do it all.
  #32  
Old 02-08-2008, 02:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Big D TEXAS
i'm not using a 45 but i too like 100 (E strigs). seems to keep things from getting muddy.

i talk a bit about it in my own thread.

making my own set
__________________
I'm what Willis was talkin' bout!
  #33  
Old 02-08-2008, 02:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
I disagree with many that have posted in this thread. I feel that lighter gauge strings are muddier and heavy strings have a clearer sound.

When I compare heavy and light strings of the same brand - I seem to notice that the lighter strings have a thicker, deeper sound. What people often call "warm" or "round".

It is the thicker, higher tension strings that sound "thin" or "tinny" or whatever you want to call it.

Basically, a lighter string is a looser string, and a looser string gives a deeper sounding note. Isn't this why so many artists have detuned to get what they consider better
tone?

Just like EQing your amp - What sounds deep or warm and round when playing alone, turns into mud in the mix, and what sounds thin and weak playing alone, sounds deep yet punchy and articulate in the mix.

So, if any string is muddier in the mix, it's lighter gauges. Maybe you guys just thought your 105 E was muddy because your old strings were dead.
  #34  
Old 02-08-2008, 08:34 PM
DavePlaysBass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CO
Supporting Member
I have been a fan of 45-100 for some time. My frustration is the brands with really good tapered B strings (La Bella, Sadowsky) either go 40-100 or 45-105. The 40-60 on the D and G are thin to my ears. The 85-105 on the A and E are boomy to my ears. Reading this thread makes think I should just go back to D'Addario XL-170s. The Fender Nickels come 45-100 and are pretty good too.
  #35  
Old 02-09-2008, 10:08 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Bryson View Post
I feel that lighter gauge strings are muddier and heavy strings have a clearer sound.

When I compare heavy and light strings of the same brand - I seem to notice that the lighter strings have a thicker, deeper sound. What people often call "warm" or "round".

It is the thicker, higher tension strings that sound "thin" or "tinny" or whatever you want to call it.

Basically, a lighter string is a looser string, and a looser string gives a deeper sounding note.

So, if any string is muddier in the mix, it's lighter gauges. Maybe you guys just thought your 105 E was muddy because your old strings were dead.

make up yo mind foo

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavePlaysBass View Post
The Fender Nickels come 45-100 and are pretty good too.
yessir.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:17 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.