Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Strings [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Strings [DB] Double bass strings discussion


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-23-2005, 11:09 AM
ElMon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Supporting Member
Attention Kay Users

I have a 54 M-1, and I'd like to move over to gut strings, albeit with a steel wrapped E string (possibly the A too). My signal chain is as follows: David gage pickup, monster cable, Aguilar DB 680, QSC 850, 1 or 2 Aggie 112's. This amp rig combats the muddiness often associated with Kays (and the Gage for that matter). Basically, I set the frequency sweeps on the extreme highs and lows for each side, and It's fullrange upright nirvana! Also, the Kay has a rosewood board.
I've poured over posts on strings, but I'm really only interested in real world experience from actual Kay users. Price isn't an issue, but quality is. Thanks for the help.
Sign in to disble this ad
  #2  
Old 01-23-2005, 08:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: central Texas
It depends on your bass.

I had a 62 Kay that did not respond well with gut strings. The top was too thick and stiff. The higher tension of steel strings brought out the best in that bass.
My 37 Kay that responds very well to low tension. The top is thinner.

I read somewhere that as steel strings started becoming popular, Kay began making thicker tops. If your bass is a 54, chances are that the top is one of the thinner ones. But even with carved basses, some respond well with gut and some don't.

As far as quality strings, Pirastro Chorda D&G are the best plain gut strings I've played. The Chorda E&A are very big roundwound gut strings, and the E can be tough to play. They will probably take their toll on your rosewood fingerboard. I play Pirastro Olive E&A with the Chorda D&G, and they blend well. They are flatwound, and won't put a rut in your FB as quickly.
  #3  
Old 01-24-2005, 01:21 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Milford, NJ
I'm surprised you're using Aguilar 112s to combat muddiness. My experience with them is they have a lot of lows and low mids which were too dark for my Kay. I went with Acme and Euphonic Audio and got a much cleaner sound.
  #4  
Old 01-24-2005, 01:59 AM
ElMon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Supporting Member
Thanks for the advice on the strings, and as well for the info on Kay bass history. Strangely enough, with the full range clarity of the DB 680, I get an insane amount of detail out of the Aggie 112. Maybe it's the QSC. ??? Anyways, thanx for the info.
  #5  
Old 01-24-2005, 10:46 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Quote:
Originally Posted by abaguer
I'm surprised you're using Aguilar 112s to combat muddiness. My experience with them is they have a lot of lows and low mids which were too dark for my Kay. I went with Acme and Euphonic Audio and got a much cleaner sound.
I had a very similar experience with the GS112. Although a nice sounding cabinet, it had too much color to accurately reproduce the sound of my Kay with a Bassmax pickup.
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:49 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.