Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Strings [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Strings [DB] Double bass strings discussion


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 03-30-2010, 06:24 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: italy, milan
Gamut Vs Eudoxa

Dear friends,
I'm now using Olive G,D and Eudoxa A,E

I'm wondering to switch to a full Gamut experience, but i mind discovering that A and E silverplated a very same of eudoxa,(both pizz and bowing purpose) is it a wrong point of view?

Thank you for your time

Ciao
Giovanni
Sign in to disble this ad
  #2  
Old 03-30-2010, 07:27 AM
AMJBASS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Supporting Member
I don't think you will find them similar at all. While I haven't had the opportunity to play Gamut wrapped E and A, I have used several wound low gut(E and A wound with round wire). They are much more open sounding than Eudoxa or Olive, and are harder to get going with the bow. Depends on what you are looking for. If you are trying to achieve the most traditional sound I would say go for it.
  #3  
Old 03-31-2010, 01:30 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: No' Cal (light)
i agree. i've played Gamut copper wound A and E for getting on two years now. they are really great strings. but they differ from Eudoxa and Oliv in volume, tone, feel, and bowability. at least on my bass, the wound Gamuts are much louder and fuller, brighter. the wound Gamuts do not have the smooth feel or the same bowability of the others.
  #4  
Old 03-31-2010, 07:23 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montreal
I had the full Eudoxa set, and the full gamut set. It's very different, but it worth the try (if you have the money). I love the full gamut set, but for dryness reasons, I had problems with the E and A strings, I had to send them back and they rewound them for free. Meanwhile I tried Garbo and Spiro E and A, and I have to admit, even with the difference of tension, I kept the Spiro's on.

François
__________________
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/bassejazz
  #5  
Old 03-31-2010, 09:44 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: italy, milan
thank you for your opinion, bowing is main part of my study, but lon stage i only pizz.
is there a different approach pizzwise? technique adjustments?

Thank you again
  #6  
Old 03-31-2010, 09:52 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montreal
Yes they are different, Gamut have lower tension than Eudoxa. Eudoxa are Sticky on the left hand, that's why I changed. For the technique, i guess you will find out for yourself. My advice with your right hand is to play at the end of the fingerboard.

François
__________________
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/bassejazz
  #7  
Old 04-01-2010, 01:46 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: No' Cal (light)
Right +1. And because the Gamuts are lower tension than the Eudoxa's, the Gamuts when you play pizz sound and feel differently. The Gamuts can be played with much less effort, and they have that "pop" on the front of the note, and an expressiveness that i did not have to the same extent with the Eudoxas. Then again, the Oliv G comes close...
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:38 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.