Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Strings [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Strings [DB] Double bass strings discussion


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 10-18-2004, 07:54 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Send a message via Yahoo to Rob Hunter
"Responsive" Arco Strings?

My thanks for feedback re: earlier request on choosing strings.

I've decided to focus on just one bass and set it up for arco. What orchestral strings do you people find the most responsive to bow? I'm currently using Obligatos and they're pretty good for most situations, but I sometimes have trouble getting them to speak with the bow - well, certainly the E string (I REALLY have to dig in there).

* Also * when suggesting a bowable string, any comments on tension would be helpful!

This will be my first set of strings for strictly arco purposes (have used Helicore Hybrids, Corellis and Obligatos in the past).

Thanks so much,
- Rob
Sign in to disble this ad
  #2  
Old 10-18-2004, 09:21 AM
AMJBASS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Supporting Member
Original Flexocores are a really dark sounding string that plays wonderfully arco. I think you will find that the E will be much easier to start. They don't roll like the Obligatos. They are higher tension than the Obligatos however, much closer to Spirocore Orchestra. If you want a little less tension the "new" Flexocores are great as well(both are meant for arco), however they are brighter.
  #3  
Old 10-18-2004, 10:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Austin, TX
The lower strings are always harder to start. You can spend money on new strings as you see fit, but slowing your bow down, putting more weight on the string, and/or bringing the bow up to the fingerboard will help you more than anything else to get the E going...
  #4  
Old 10-18-2004, 10:53 AM
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
I'd say that's one way to do it, maybe if you're still using Pop's rosin. I go the other way with cello rosin, and in my case pressure on the bow is your worst enemy.

Bow speed is critical in either case, and I saw someone mention somewhere around here about starting the string with the stick is much akin to pizzicato, which I find to be true.
  #5  
Old 10-18-2004, 11:52 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Right, I forgot to mention all the arco-friendly rosins on the market to spend your money on...
  #6  
Old 10-19-2004, 11:37 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Send a message via Yahoo to Rob Hunter
Well, rosin and technique aside, I'll likely go with the Flexocors. But does anyone have any additional thoughts on Thomastik Superflexibles or Helicore Orchestras? I'd be interested on comments re: bow responsiveness and overall tension.

Thanks again,
- Rob
P.S. Yes, I did read the newbie section on strings - now I'm more confused than ever! : )
  #7  
Old 10-20-2004, 11:23 AM
Chasarms's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
Supporting Member
I switched my Shen from Obligatos to Flexocors (not the originals) and was amazed at how much richer I found the arco sound to be.

On my bass, Obligatos offered a thinner arco tone that really annoyed me. The G sounded like a dying cat.

The pizz sound is fine with me as well. I will agree the the obligatos sounded better pizz, but to me arco tone was not worth it.

I have heard that Velvet strings are very responsive to the bow and don't give away your pizz tone, but that is a pretty expensive experiment.

I plan on trying velvets after the holiday season. I don't want to switch strings until after things slow down a bit.
  #8  
Old 10-20-2004, 01:19 PM
I'm absent from Talkbass for an indefinite period
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Québec, Canada
Supporting Member
I'm not an arco player, but I guess the Permanents would be more responsive than Flexocors, and also have a brighter tone.
__________________
Due to health issues I'm on indefinite leave of absence from Talkbass.
Please get in touch with Chris Fitzgerald or other moderators for board-related issues.
  #9  
Old 10-20-2004, 01:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by francois
I'm not an arco player, but I guess the Permanents would be more responsive than Flexocors, and also have a brighter tone.
+1, and I do play arco! It's a heck of a pizz string, too! Not at all as bright as you might think. Not brighter than Spiros, IME.

Vincent
  #10  
Old 10-20-2004, 02:34 PM
Guest
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
I recently gave Original Flexocore's a run. I don't remember which version of the Flexocore's require more bow pressure than the others, but I felt I had to dig in more with the "Original" Flexo's I tried.

So, I switched to Permanent's. They sound much better on my bass than the Flexo's and I don't need to dig quite so hard. Also, if your string height is set up more for arco work (a little lower) the Pirastro's growl a bit and sustain pretty well for pizz. I'd call them an overlooked "hybrid", depending on your string height.

Last edited by B. Graham : 10-21-2004 at 08:18 AM.
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.