Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Strings [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Strings [DB] Double bass strings discussion


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-16-2010, 10:17 PM
baldy McBalders's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PORTLAND! Oregon
Supporting Member
string tension interaction with DBs?

Hi everyone,
I noticed that many posters whom have had a fair bit of string experience ( hi , Uncle Toad!) have mentioned that certain basses sound better with high tension strings, and others sound better with low tension (presumably due to a confluence of factors, including, but not limited to table thickness,tailpiece mass, break angle over the bridge, afterlength, mensure, overstand, soundpost setting, neck angle, etc. etc. . .). My question is this; all things equal, is there a telltale indication in the sound of a known string (say, spiro mittels) that would indicate that a bass "prefers" (I know, anthropomorphizing) a certain tension? I know that "tone" is subjective, but if (on average) a certain tension string set created an imbalance in volume in a certain string, would that indicate that a higher (or lower) tension string would interact better with the theoretical "standardized" bass?
Yes, I know, wordy.
Cutting to it; Theoretically, if my E is weak, all other things being equal, would a higher tension string be the choice, or a lower? Or, if my D was particularly louder, which would be the way to go? If I have really wolfy places on the bass, would a lower/higher tension string ameliorate this? (this seems to be stretching it a bit I guess). For relative simplicity, I am asking for responses that are full string sets. This is more academic, as my current bass (see profile) sounds how you would expect. This is just one of those questions that is more posed for my own knowledge and edification, and will most likely help me set up my next bass a little more directly.
Oh yeah, in my case, I am playing 70% pizz, 30% arco, if that defines my particular strings qualitative "tone" requirements a bit. My Crap bass has Superflexes on it, and I'm quite happy with the balance/tradeoffs at the moment. I'm having a dedicated lefty Engel EM-1 made (all I can afford, after the CCB debacle) as we speak, so there is a bit of less-than-academic motivation behind this, I suppose.
blah blah blah. . .
I hope this is clear, as least to someone!
Thanks!
Brian
Sign in to disble this ad
__________________
Is it a good sign or a bad sign that I am selling my bicycle stuff for bass stuff?
Feels pretty good so far. . .
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.