CP, checking out your profile reminds me of being exposed to David Walter during my brief and misspent year at Manhattan School of Music. An inspirational guy. Looks like you have a sweet old bass, too.
What is your string length (mensure), from nut to bridge? I used to play a funky old bass with a 44 /2" mensure, so I have some experience with tightness. No matter what I (or several luthiers) did, that bass was always harder to play than most.
I think of string length as perhaps the single greatest factor in this equation. Since the pitches are consistent, a longer string length will simply be under higher tension. Shorter mensure equals lower tension, in general.
Many basses have between 41" and 42" mensures. Many fine orchestral instruments are in the 40" to 41" range. Many arco players look for basses in the 40" to 41 1/2" range, or even shorter (I think that Edgar Meyer's is 39 7/8", for example).
That's the first thing I'd want to know about your situation. I am currently playing a 42" string length bass. It is tighter than ideal for arco (IMHO), but has a nice punch for pizz, both results of the higher tension.
Tail wires, higher saddles, bridge heights, "softer" strings, all that could help a bit, but if you have a longer than average string length, it may be an uphill battle with modest gains. As we say in New England, you could be "p*ssing up a rope"...
Also worth having a good luthier check out your sound post for length and placement. Michael Hartery, who recently returned here to Boston (email:
mhartery@aol.com; or phone: 978.500.8848) just improved my bass' response A LOT in about 45 minutes by replacing my post with a shorter one (for winter/cold/contracted bass body), and by moving it over toward the "G" side and toward the tailpiece (by about 3/8", diagonally). The best money I ever spent on anything related to musical instruments, on work done by a great bassist and luthier.