Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Hardware, Setup & Repair [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 06-18-2011, 06:33 PM
TheWoodShed's Avatar
God of Thunder...retired.
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Supporting Member
Compound Radius Set up question

Sign in to disble this ad
When doing a set up to generally match the radius of the fret board on the bass, on a compound board what radius do you match for the bridge?
__________________
WTB:
2 EMG Quick connect battery cables
  #2  
Old 06-18-2011, 06:34 PM
TheWoodShed's Avatar
God of Thunder...retired.
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Supporting Member
Gotta love posting from my Droid. Please delete. Duplicate post.
__________________
WTB:
2 EMG Quick connect battery cables
  #3  
Old 06-18-2011, 06:55 PM
Banned

Endorsing Artist: MLaghus Custom Basses
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boca Raton - FL
You follow the geometry of a cone. The formula is here:

STEWMAC.COM : Compound Radius: Explained Free information

For a standard 9.5-16 the bridge will be around 20...
  #4  
Old 06-18-2011, 07:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Duluth, MN
The flat, cylinder and cone diagrams are very well explained. The radius formula diagrams - not so much.


This article does clearly point out to me the benefits of compound radius for an even setup (when using anything other that a flat fingerboard OR angled strings).

The big question is: Why aren't compound radii more common?

Last edited by Bob C : 06-19-2011 at 08:47 AM. Reason: typo
  #5  
Old 06-18-2011, 10:52 PM
TheWoodShed's Avatar
God of Thunder...retired.
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by allexcosta View Post
You follow the geometry of a cone. The formula is here:

STEWMAC.COM : Compound Radius: Explained Free information

the bridge will be around 20...
What do you mean "For a standard 9.5-16"? Where are those measurements taken? At the nut and 17" point of a 34" scale bass?
__________________
WTB:
2 EMG Quick connect battery cables
  #6  
Old 06-18-2011, 11:05 PM
TheWoodShed's Avatar
God of Thunder...retired.
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob C View Post
The flat, cylinder and cone diagrams are very well explained. The radius formula diagrams - not so much.


This article does clearly point out to me the benefits of compound radius for an even setup (when using anything other that a flat fingerboard OT angled strings).

The big question is: Why aren't compound radii more common?
Exactly. I am thoroughly confused.
__________________
WTB:
2 EMG Quick connect battery cables
  #7  
Old 06-19-2011, 08:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Duluth, MN
The WoodShed,

To answer your original question, here's how I set up my action: As a starting point, set all strings the same height at the last fret. Then tweak it by feel from there.

My bass doesn't have a compound radius. But the same principle applies. You can only have your strings set at one curve. That is, unless you are considering the radius of the nut. That's another can of worms, I suppose.
  #8  
Old 06-19-2011, 07:09 PM
Supportive Fender
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob C View Post
As a starting point, set all strings the same height at the last fret.
here's your answer.

don't bother trying to caculate or measure a "radius" at the bridge; even with a non-compound board, the strings are still starting from a narrow spread at the nut, going to a wide spread at the bridge.

use your little machinist's ruler to set each string to be the same height off of one higher fret (for me it's 3/32" at the 15th). this will let the string path automatically follow the fretboard, compound radius or not.

from there, you can indeed adjust by feel; i like them a little lower, especially on the treble side. i might end up with something like 'just over 2/32" on the treble side', gradually increasing to 'just under 3/32" on the bass side'.

as long as the measurement is the same or is consistently increasing from string to string at a given fret, you'll conform to any radius just fine.
__________________
Walter Wright
Guitar Repair Gnome
Alpha Music, VA Beach
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:14 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.