|  | 
06-16-2011, 12:06 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: Dallas, TX | | | Headstock modification
Sign in to disble this ad
I'm toying with the idea of modifying a headstock to make it more compact and lighter. It's a Fender style scroll pattern, straight (not angled). I want to remove the G tuner from the end and place it on the lower side (3+1), then re-shape the end of the headstock (basically lopping off the rounded end of it). I also want to shave off about 1/4in of wood from both the top and bottom edges - effectively turning the traditional size into a much more compact peghead.
My question is this: assuming I'd be removing approx. 25-30% of the material, would the remaining wood be strong enough to hold the tension of the strings? Also, is the fact that it's straight and non-angled have any bearing on the structural integrity of the resulting smaller headstock?
.cdp | 
06-16-2011, 05:53 AM
| | | | making the headstock thinner would be a bad idea which could make it unstable. Lopping off wood from its end where there are no tuners is fine. You state your gonna move the G string tuner. Just make sure you leave enough wood thickness between top ends of tuner shaft holes and edges of headstock. And dont mess with headstocks thickness.
__________________
life for its own carnal pleasure. Bass: Jackson JS3. Guitars: BC Rich IT Warlock & BC Rich masterpeice Mockingbird shortscale. Zoom club#2. BC Rich club#26.
| 
06-16-2011, 09:22 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: Dallas, TX | | | Thanks! Oh, I wasn't going to alter the thickness at all - I just meant I want to remove wood from the edges. Right now, the holes are about 3/4in from the edge - lotsa wood there. I'm thinking it should be ok to trim the edge down so it's about 1/2in from the holes...
.cdp | 
06-16-2011, 10:28 AM
|  | Signed, Sealed, Delivered | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: NY & MA | | | I'd say you're good to go. No down-sides that I can see. | 
06-16-2011, 11:25 AM
| | Registered User Endorsing Artist: J.C. Basses | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Phoenix, Arizona 85029 | | | I don't think you'll be risking any sort of structural integrity with that plan. Go for it.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by McThumpenstein I don't think the wife would buy the "I need to take off this knob and put a whole new bass under it" story. | | 
06-17-2011, 06:20 PM
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by CPike Thanks! Oh, I wasn't going to alter the thickness at all - I just meant I want to remove wood from the edges. Right now, the holes are about 3/4in from the edge - lotsa wood there. I'm thinking it should be ok to trim the edge down so it's about 1/2in from the holes...
.cdp | Half inch or little more should be fine. As best I can tell, on my espltd f154 the holes themself are right at half inch distance from edge of headstock for closest to edge one.
__________________
life for its own carnal pleasure. Bass: Jackson JS3. Guitars: BC Rich IT Warlock & BC Rich masterpeice Mockingbird shortscale. Zoom club#2. BC Rich club#26.
| 
06-17-2011, 06:43 PM
| | | | no pics no neck | 
06-21-2011, 02:57 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: Dallas, TX | | | Update: the headstock mod went well - no problems. Thanks for all the helpful input!
.cdp | 
06-21-2011, 02:59 PM
| | | | pics, dude.
__________________
Spector Club #182, Hartke Club #251, U.S. Peavey Club #194, Alabama Boys Club #26
| 
06-22-2011, 05:04 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: USA | | I've done this to several Fender type pegheads with good results. I've noticed the "dead spot" has either gone away or been reduced and neck dive is non-existant.
The large tuner holes in this one were plugged, the front and back veneered, front edges chamfered and new holes for Goto types drilled.
Glad your mod went well.
mech
Edit: I do make sure the tuners are lined up for a straight pull on the strings.
__________________
U.S. Peavey Club Member #137, Official Short Scale Bass Club member number 186
Last edited by mech : 06-22-2011 at 05:08 AM.
Reason: more info
| 
06-22-2011, 11:36 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: Dallas, TX | | | I'll try to get some pics of mine by the end of the week. It's really nothing special, though. I just wanted it to be simple, not flashy - but also not dorky, either. The original headstock was the standard Fender Precision shape (the bass is an early '70s Japanese P-bass knockoff by "Ventura"). I kept the original (Schaller) 11/16'' holes, which were the same needed for a cannibalized set of old Ibanez machines. The weight difference was significant because the Ibanez machine gears had a smaller compact footprint despite the full-size shafts.
@mech: Funny you should mention it, but the dead spot (typical 5th fret on G str "C") is completely gone now and the note sustains as much as any other! I used to use a Fat Finger to compensate for this but no more...
Again, pics later this week -
.cdp | 
06-24-2011, 10:27 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: Dallas, TX | | | As promised, pics of the headstock mod...
The original shape was the standard Fender P-bass style...
.cdp | 
06-24-2011, 10:27 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2005 Location: Dallas, TX | | | ...and lastly...
.cdp | 
06-25-2011, 09:03 AM
|  | <---Shinola Shite--^ | | Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Manitoba, Canada | | | that looks cool, nice job!
__________________
'74ish Ampeg V4B, 115/210. * '75 Gibson G3. *Epi Tbird. *Squier: VM Jazz, CV 50's P. *Squier VM Jazz Assoc. *MBC 641. Squier owners club
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | | |