Quote:
Originally Posted by maturanesa I have this problem with my fender JB MIM.
Some notes have a poor sustain in comparision with another notes on the fretboard. For example: A string, 4 fret (poor), A string 7 fret (ok). G string, 7 fret (the note create an harmonic and die in few seconds). G string, fret 12 (ok).. etc
The action string per string is about (measuring the end of the fingerboard and string distance):
G: 3 mm
D: 3.2 mm
A: 3.5 mm
E: 4 mm
The height in the bridge is about exactly the radius of the fingerboard, and the nut create this diferences...
What i should do?
thanx |
This illustrates the nature of dead spots perfectly.
"Dead spots" are really "dead frequencies". The bass as a unit will have a certain frequency that is it's resonant frequency - that is the frequency it would produce if it were tapped or struck (like a drum). It's the natural frequency of the instrument.
When you pluck a string, some of the energy of the vibration is transmited to the instrument (body and neck as a unit). The closer the frequency of vibration of the string is to the resonant frequency of the instrument, the more of the string energy will be absorbed by the instrument. [High school science - sympathetic vibration] And the more string energy that is absorbed by the instrument, the less energy is left to keep the string vibrating. So the string vibration dies faster at the resonant frequency of the instrument - or multiples and whole fractions of that frequency - i.e. octaves of the note.
If you check the posting above you will see that the player complains of "dead spots" on A string at fret 4 and on G string at fret 7. The notes produced at those locations are D. If you were to do a vibration analysis on the bass you would find that the resonant frequency of the instrument is D.
In this case we are seeing a typical "dead note" problem. And the idea of adding or removing mass works (to a degree) because as you change the
mass, such as by adding a a Fat Finger, you will move the resonant frequency. An therein lies the problem - where to move it to. If D is a problem, how about Bb? F? Ab? You might think that killing the resonance of the instrument entirely would be a good idea, but that has been tried and the results were not very popular. As an example, "Plexiglas" has a very low resonance characteristic, but the Armstrong basses made from it were not known for having very good tone. Many makers insist on using "tone woods" which by definition are resonant and consequently have a resonant frequency.
So you get to choose - a "resonant instrument" with a natural organic woody tone with an associated "dead frequency" problem, or a non resonant device that lacks character, but without dead spots. Granted, the "lacks character" comment is a matter of opinion, but many reviewers have made such observations about basses that are not very resonant.
Hopes this helps in understanding of what's going on with dead spots.