Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Hardware, Setup & Repair [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 02-20-2009, 03:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Question about high-mass bridge on a P-Bass?

Sign in to disble this ad
So, I have a MIM Fender Precision, and want to install a Gotoh 201 bridge. I heard that due to the larger saddles and thicker plate, you can't get good action with a high-mass bridge. Is that true? I play my bass at factory specs right now, so will I be able to use a Gotoh and go that low? For anyone who owns a Gotoh, Badass, or other high-mass bridge, do you regret replacing the original with a high-mass, and why?
  #2  
Old 02-20-2009, 04:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NY
If you set the neck with little relief, you can still set your action pretty low with thick base plates. With about credit card thickness relief, I had to set the saddles almost flat on the baseplate. I straightned the neck out and I had to raise the saddles much more to get the same string height.

High mass bridge made my p sound dead, so I took it off and put a traditional fedner bridge. High mass bridge made the bass more metallic and lost some of the boom.
  #3  
Old 02-20-2009, 04:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Finland
Easy. If the bridge is too high relative to the neck to get the saddles low enough for your needs, place a shim in the neck pocket so the neck sits higher, that's the way to get more adjustment range to adjust the saddles for the action you want. And it's reversible: if you later on decide to put the original bridge back on your bass, just switch the bridges, take out the shim, put the bass together and it's back to stock. I've had a Badass on my P-bass for 12 years now and I have no regrets, it's solid piece of hardware that works.
__________________
"It's not really what you play, but what you leave out that counts." Rick Danko, 1976
  #4  
Old 02-20-2009, 04:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Buffalo, NY. USA
It seems that the concept of a one piece neck and body, like a Rick, is totally opposite to putting a shim between a P neck and body. Anything that interferes with the contact between neck and body seems suspect. And... what material would a shim be made of??

Why not leave it alone... or get another bass to suit you're tastes? I love my '69 P the way it was created.
__________________
Solo bass compositions at http://www.youtube.com/user/solowbass
  #5  
Old 02-20-2009, 05:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Finland
On my P-bass the shim is rosewood. And IMO it doesn't interfere with the neck-to-body contact, I haven't noticed any difference in sustain with or without the shim. The high-mass bridge did help a bit with the traditional Fender C# dead spot and in taming some "hot" notes, but the difference is subtle. And I had to replace the bridge anyway as the original bridge's saddles had worn down.
__________________
"It's not really what you play, but what you leave out that counts." Rick Danko, 1976
  #6  
Old 02-20-2009, 06:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by So Low Bass View Post
It seems that the concept of a one piece neck and body, like a Rick, is totally opposite to putting a shim between a P neck and body. Anything that interferes with the contact between neck and body seems suspect. And... what material would a shim be made of??

Why not leave it alone... or get another bass to suit you're tastes? I love my '69 P the way it was created.
been having some problems with a height adjustment screw, it keeps slipping.
  #7  
Old 02-20-2009, 06:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
I jumped on the whole high-mass bridge bandwagon. . . . . I regreted it after a month and a half. I made sure I gave it a chance too, I left the bridge on the bass for a nice period of time to make an honest opinion. I agree with the post above, I felt like it compressed the tone of my p bass, as well as giving a metallic kind of sound. It took away the old school groove tone the p bass is known for. But. . . . this is just MY opinion, everybody has their own definition of what the right tone is.

If you want a p bass for the tone it is known for, I'd say leave it stock. If you want to make it a band cutting monster, put a high mass bridge on it. I do however honestly feel it takes away some of the warm fatness. Just my 2.
  #8  
Old 02-20-2009, 06:58 PM
lavmonga's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York, NY
Supporting Member
Have a schaller roller on my P and haven't had any issues.
  #9  
Old 02-20-2009, 07:05 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Land of Lakland
I have a badass II on mine and I just tweaked the neck less than 1/4 of a turn and haven't needed to touched it in three years.

G
  #10  
Old 02-21-2009, 01:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Finland
Quote:
Originally Posted by So Low Bass View Post
Why not leave it alone... or get another bass to suit you're tastes? I love my '69 P the way it was created.
Sure you love it, but what's the problem if the OP wants to mod his P-bass? It's not like there's a stone tablet with the commandment "Thou shalt not mod a Fender" carved on it somewhere. People have been modding Fender basses for ages and as I mentioned, that particular mod is reversible.
__________________
"It's not really what you play, but what you leave out that counts." Rick Danko, 1976
  #11  
Old 02-21-2009, 08:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
True, Fenders have been being modified for a long period of time, but to me the OP sounds unsure of what the high mass bridge does for the bass. If you like Jamerson's tone, or say Reggae and Blues, you would want to leave it the way it is (it keeps the round pillowy sound). If you're into punk and metal, I'd say put a badass on it. I'm just trying to let the OP know what it will do to the tone, because it will change the original tone. It will however give you really nice action.
  #12  
Old 02-21-2009, 01:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
I play metal, and classic rock. I already knew how it would affect the sound, my question was mostly about how it would affect the action.
  #13  
Old 02-21-2009, 05:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Canada
It won't affect the action. I have used them and you can adjust the action the same. Check out Warmoth guitars they drill probably 98% of there fender jazz and bass bodies for Gotoh 201 bridges. Leo Fenders basic bridge plate is what contributes to the mellower sound of the vintage P's. I find the Gotoh makes the individual notes a little clearer/punchier, but probably the best thing is that the saddles stay in there little tracks and don't move side to side.
  #14  
Old 02-25-2009, 07:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ray View Post
It won't affect the action. I have used them and you can adjust the action the same. Check out Warmoth guitars they drill probably 98% of there fender jazz and bass bodies for Gotoh 201 bridges. Leo Fenders basic bridge plate is what contributes to the mellower sound of the vintage P's. I find the Gotoh makes the individual notes a little clearer/punchier, but probably the best thing is that the saddles stay in there little tracks and don't move side to side.
Actually, they drill to stock Fender specs. A Gotoh 201 is a drop-in for Fender, so it uses the same holes, but they are not neccesarily drilled for that bridge.
  #15  
Old 03-10-2009, 02:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bowie, MD
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ray View Post
It won't affect the action. I have used them and you can adjust the action the same.
Yes, sometimes it will. If your initial saddles are sitting kinda low with the stock bridge, when you put one on with a thicker base plate, it can make the saddles bottom out BEFORE you get the SAME action you had before the bridge change.

I have put higher mass bridges on 3 of my basses, and I had to shim each one. Granted I didn't always shim because I could not get the same action (only 2), but also because I want my saddle intonation screws to be aproximately parallel to the body. if they are angled deeply towards the body, like when the saddles have to get lowered almost to the deck it looks wrong to me and you are probably giving up a little string downforce on the saddles. Maybe it doesn't matter, but since the solution is simple, shimming, I see no reason to put up with it that way.
__________________
SX: Ursa2 6, 3 SJB75C 4+1, 3 SJB62, 2 SJB57, SPJ62, 2 SB301, Douglas:WVEB, WOB826, WPB955(fretless), 2 WPB980 (4 & 5),Yamaha BB404, Fullerton Ventura NT, Brice Z6, Squire Deluxe Jazz V
  #16  
Old 03-10-2009, 04:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London, England
Hi

For 30 years I had a Badass II on my 70's Precision. Recently I did an audio A/B comparison with the Fender bridge. Guess what ... I preferred the Fender bridge.

If the saddles are slipping down all you need to do is add a little glue to the screw or wrap plumbers PTFE tape around the screw. It will never move again unless you want it to.

Peace
Davo
  #17  
Old 03-10-2009, 04:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
The high-mass/low-mass discussion has been done at length here before...

that said - I'm of the mind that "mass" is not nearly so important as stability and adjustablity - and old fender bridges aren't as stable as I like. I've been using Hipshot A bridges for a while nad really dig them. They aren't as massive as a badass but are dead stable.
__________________
SWEET ZOMBIE JESUS!
  #18  
Old 03-10-2009, 05:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern California
GOLD Supporting Member
A little Loc-Tite (Green) on that adjustment screw and you're back to playing.
  #19  
Old 03-10-2009, 06:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, Tx
Some times it changes the action and takes a shim, some times it doesn't. Some times it improves the playability (by being more stable), some times it doesn't. Some times it sounds better to you, some times it doesn't. Change it and see. It's completely reversible and not very expensive.

I have a '99 Hot Rod P that's totally stock and I wouldn't change a thing. I have a 2008 P that has a Gotoh and a shim. Has more sustain and plays better than stock. I like 'em both.
__________________
There's so much I don't know I don't even know what I don't know.
  #20  
Old 03-11-2009, 06:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petethebassman View Post
It's not like there's a stone tablet with the commandment "Thou shalt not mod a Fender" carved on it somewhere.
If the bass in question is a stock '69, there is...

That being said... good discussion. I have a 78 P and have debated going the BadAss route several times but have never taken the plunge. I appreciate hearing the different perspectives.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:40 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.