Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Hardware, Setup & Repair [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 08-16-2011, 02:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA
Send a message via AIM to KingRazor Send a message via MSN to KingRazor Send a message via Yahoo to KingRazor Send a message via Skype™ to KingRazor
Radius gauges

Sign in to disble this ad
I want to start doing my own setups. I'm looking for some good radius gauges.

I prefer under-string radius gauges because of this:



I don't like the bottom of the lowest string to be closer to the fretboard than the bottom of the highest string.

So I'm looking for some under-string radius gauges that will work with a variety of basses (I have no idea what basses I may buy in the future and want to be prepared).

I've looked at these: STEWMAC.COM : Understring Radius Gauges

I'm wondering if these would be worth getting. I know some basses have some non-standard radii (my SX has a 15 3/4" radius, lol wut?)

Do you think a set like that would cover all most of what I'll run into? Is it worth it to spend $25 on these or is there a cheaper DIY method (that doesn't require a lot of precision? I'm bad at precision)

Thanks for the help
__________________
Ibanez Club #648; P&W Bassists #795; V-AMP Squad #7; Oregon Bassists #29
  #2  
Old 08-16-2011, 02:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
I use the stew mac. (like version #1) works good
  #3  
Old 08-16-2011, 04:11 PM
JLS JLS is offline
Registered User

I setup & repair guitars & basses
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kensington, Ca
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingRazor View Post
I want to start doing my own setups. I'm looking for some good radius gauges.

I prefer under-string radius gauges because of this:



I don't like the bottom of the lowest string to be closer to the fretboard than the bottom of the highest string.

So I'm looking for some under-string radius gauges that will work with a variety of basses (I have no idea what basses I may buy in the future and want to be prepared).

I've looked at these: STEWMAC.COM : Understring Radius Gauges

I'm wondering if these would be worth getting. I know some basses have some non-standard radii (my SX has a 15 3/4" radius, lol wut?)

Do you think a set like that would cover all most of what I'll run into? Is it worth it to spend $25 on these or is there a cheaper DIY method (that doesn't require a lot of precision? I'm bad at precision)

Thanks for the help
Frankly, I think these are a solution, looking for a problem. I eyeball, or use a #0670 Stewmac action gauge; even that's overkill.
__________________
Instrument repair/setup, Bay area
  #4  
Old 08-16-2011, 04:20 PM
Registered User

Endorsing Artist: J.C. Basses
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Phoenix, Arizona 85029
Send a message via MSN to FunkMetalBass
What is the point of the red line in the first picture? The strings bottoms are all exactly the same distance from the fretboard. Also, the above-string gauges were, I thought, only for fretboard radius measurements and not for string measurements.

Feeler gauges will get you there and be much nicer for setting your own action preference while maintaining fretboard radius.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by McThumpenstein View Post
I don't think the wife would buy the "I need to take off this knob and put a whole new bass under it" story.
  #5  
Old 08-16-2011, 04:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern California
GOLD Supporting Member
Radius gauges do not account for the fact that larger strings have a larger vibrational path and need more clearance from the frets compared to smaller strings. This is why virtually all published setup specifications call for higher action on the fat strings (typically 1/32" higher).

Personally, I think a 6" scale with 1/64" and 1/32" graduations is the only measuring tool you need.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradjonesbass View Post
Study what Pino does and do that! WWPD?
  #6  
Old 08-16-2011, 04:23 PM
Registered User

Endorsing Artist: J.C. Basses
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Phoenix, Arizona 85029
Send a message via MSN to FunkMetalBass
Quote:
Originally Posted by testing1two View Post
Radius gauges do not account for the fact that larger strings have a larger vibrational path and need more clearance from the frets compared to smaller strings. This is why virtually all published setup specifications call for higher action on the fat strings (typically 1/32" higher).

Personally, I think a 6" scale with 1/64" and 1/32" graduations is the only measuring tool you need.
Assuming two strings are under equal tension, what difference does its size make in it's vibrational amplitude? It shouldn't make a difference.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by McThumpenstein View Post
I don't think the wife would buy the "I need to take off this knob and put a whole new bass under it" story.
  #7  
Old 08-16-2011, 04:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern California
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkMetalBass View Post
Assuming two strings are under equal tension, what difference does its size make in it's vibrational amplitude? It shouldn't make a difference.
That's an interesting hypothesis but 99% of the bass string sets on the market are not equal tension, so I think you're pointing out the exception not the rule. Personally, I have never played a bass where the E (or B) string action can be set as low as the G string so I would never use a radius gauge to set action, especially when I can do a more precise and repeatable job with a scale.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradjonesbass View Post
Study what Pino does and do that! WWPD?
  #8  
Old 08-16-2011, 04:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA
Send a message via AIM to KingRazor Send a message via MSN to KingRazor Send a message via Yahoo to KingRazor Send a message via Skype™ to KingRazor
Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkMetalBass View Post
What is the point of the red line in the first picture? The strings bottoms are all exactly the same distance from the fretboard.
Only if the fretboard is asymmetrical...
__________________
Ibanez Club #648; P&W Bassists #795; V-AMP Squad #7; Oregon Bassists #29
  #9  
Old 08-16-2011, 06:33 PM
Registered User

Endorsing Artist: J.C. Basses
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Phoenix, Arizona 85029
Send a message via MSN to FunkMetalBass
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingRazor View Post
Only if the fretboard is asymmetrical...
Erm, what? Imagine the fretboard is one giant circle with a 12" radius. The distance from the center to the bottom of any of those strings should be the same - that's the point of the gauge. The red line thus makes no sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by testing1two View Post
That's an interesting hypothesis but 99% of the bass string sets on the market are not equal tension, so I think you're pointing out the exception not the rule. Personally, I have never played a bass where the E (or B) string action can be set as low as the G string so I would never use a radius gauge to set action, especially when I can do a more precise and repeatable job with a scale.
You should try Circle K's balanced tension strings. LLLOOOOWWW action low strings.

I wasn't really trying to prove anything, just looking for affirmation. A similar statement came up months ago, and my response was the same, but I've been milidly unsure about it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by McThumpenstein View Post
I don't think the wife would buy the "I need to take off this knob and put a whole new bass under it" story.
  #10  
Old 08-16-2011, 06:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA
Send a message via AIM to KingRazor Send a message via MSN to KingRazor Send a message via Yahoo to KingRazor Send a message via Skype™ to KingRazor
Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkMetalBass View Post
Erm, what? Imagine the fretboard is one giant circle with a 12" radius. The distance from the center to the bottom of any of those strings should be the same - that's the point of the gauge. The red line thus makes no sense.
I measure from the bottom of the strings to the fretboard, not from the middle of the strings.

If the measuring was all done from the center of the strings, the low strings would hit the frets sooner than the high strings, I don't like that.
__________________
Ibanez Club #648; P&W Bassists #795; V-AMP Squad #7; Oregon Bassists #29
  #11  
Old 08-16-2011, 06:40 PM
Registered User

Bass Technician, Club Bass - Toronto
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkMetalBass View Post
Assuming two strings are under equal tension, what difference does its size make in it's vibrational amplitude? It shouldn't make a difference.
The answer is "mass". Even if the strings were at equal tension, the greater mass of the larger diameter strings will cause larger vibrational amplitute.
__________________
Instrument Technician, Toronto
  #12  
Old 08-16-2011, 07:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern California
GOLD Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by FunkMetalBass View Post
You should try Circle K's balanced tension strings. LLLOOOOWWW action low strings.

I wasn't really trying to prove anything, just looking for affirmation. A similar statement came up months ago, and my response was the same, but I've been milidly unsure about it.
To further complicate things, LLLOOOOWWW action means high tension and stiffness, not necessarily equal tension. The increased tension lessens the vibrational amplitude of the strings which permits lower action but makes the strings less compliant (stiffer). On the opposite end of the spectrum Thomastik has used the balanced tension approach for years on their Jazz Flats and Jazz Rounds, but with much lower tension.

As Turnaround said, a string's vibrational amplitude is not just a function of tension but of string mass and stiffness. Therefore all 4 strings have different vibrational amplitudes and do not conform to a uniform radius.

Which leads us back to setting action using a scale so we can a) use existing specifications as a quick starting point and b) take measurements of the final settings once the action is adjusted to the player's preference. Then we have a reference if the bass ever goes out of adjustment. This same principles apply to using feeler gauges to set the neck relief. It's fast, precise and consistent.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradjonesbass View Post
Study what Pino does and do that! WWPD?

Last edited by testing1two : 08-16-2011 at 07:42 PM.
  #13  
Old 08-16-2011, 08:47 PM
seanm's Avatar
I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Send a message via AIM to seanm Send a message via Yahoo to seanm
GOLD Supporting Member
I like the under-string radius gauges because I can use them above and below the strings and also to check fretboard radius without removing the strings. Plus they where cheaper

And KingRazor, those images are wrong. You pick a radius gauge which matches the fretboard radius. For a perfectly flat fretboard you use a ruler

You then measure from the bottom of the string to the top of the fret on the lowest and highest strings. Then use the radius gauge to set the middle strings. It is personal preference if you use the gauge above or below the strings.

P.S. Notice how I was careful not to mention strings by name or number? Just call me Mr P.C.!
__________________
The Rippers
  #14  
Old 08-16-2011, 08:56 PM
Registered User

Owner; Knuckle Guitar Works & Circle K Strings
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by testing1two View Post
The increased tension lessens the vibrational amplitude of the strings which permits lower action but makes the strings less compliant (stiffer).
Not if they're supple in the first place. Greater mass -> greater amplitude because of greater inertia is indeed true though.

A radius gauge for the build is useful - a gauge for setup won't help much IMO.
__________________
I am; KnuckleGuitarWorks.com & CircleKstrings.com
  #15  
Old 08-16-2011, 10:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA
Send a message via AIM to KingRazor Send a message via MSN to KingRazor Send a message via Yahoo to KingRazor Send a message via Skype™ to KingRazor
Quote:
Originally Posted by seanm View Post
You pick a radius gauge which matches the fretboard radius. For a perfectly flat fretboard you use a ruler
Umm...duh. Where did I indicate that I wasn't aware of that?
__________________
Ibanez Club #648; P&W Bassists #795; V-AMP Squad #7; Oregon Bassists #29
  #16  
Old 08-16-2011, 11:08 PM
Supportive Fender
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Supporting Member
i think that was humor (seen any perfectly flat bass fretboards lately?)

+many to skipping the radius gauge, it's useless (what if the neck has a compound radius?). just get a little metal machinist's ruler and measure each string's height off the fret directly.

sometimes, i've found you couldn't use the radius gauge if you wanted to. with 5-strings, that B often has to be higher than the other strings, to the point where the theoretical radius actually has to curve back up again under it.
__________________
Walter Wright
Guitar Repair Gnome
Alpha Music, VA Beach

Last edited by walterw : 08-16-2011 at 11:15 PM.
  #17  
Old 08-16-2011, 11:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA
Send a message via AIM to KingRazor Send a message via MSN to KingRazor Send a message via Yahoo to KingRazor Send a message via Skype™ to KingRazor
Well, I guess I'm just going to get them, I'll get the action gauge too. I have all the other tools I believe I'll need for setups.

I'm going to start getting myself familiar with setups and then move on to learning how to make repairs and mods. Not sure I'll ever get to the stage of actually building from scratch, though.
__________________
Ibanez Club #648; P&W Bassists #795; V-AMP Squad #7; Oregon Bassists #29
  #18  
Old 08-16-2011, 11:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
I like the radius gauges, it takes 1 second to get a visual on how far off you are, I typically shoot for the neck's radius, then fine adjust for taste, then set the intonation...

I'd own a set pretty quick if I was setting up more often, but I have a pretty awesome friend with all this stuff, and I always set my basses up at his store...
  #19  
Old 08-16-2011, 11:17 PM
Supportive Fender
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Supporting Member
get the action gauge, but skip the radius thingies.
__________________
Walter Wright
Guitar Repair Gnome
Alpha Music, VA Beach
  #20  
Old 08-16-2011, 11:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingRazor
Well, I guess I'm just going to get them, I'll get the action gauge too. I have all the other tools I believe I'll need for setups.

I'm going to start getting myself familiar with setups and then move on to learning how to make repairs and mods. Not sure I'll ever get to the stage of actually building from scratch, though.
You can test acton by pressing the 1st fret (LH index finger) and last fret on a string (use your RH ring finger or pinky) and "bounce" the middle of the string with your thumb on right hand to test how much relief you have in the neck. Works like a charm! And no tool to keep up with
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:45 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.