Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Hardware, Setup & Repair [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 10-13-2009, 08:14 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Gent (Belgium)
refret or new neck?

Sign in to disble this ad
Hello TB'ers,

I need an opinion on this.

Should you refret a neck on an original (vintage) bass or buy a new neck?

I'm talking about my '72 Fender Jazz. It's my main playing bass. I use it all the time. The frets are really worn down, and need to be replaced. But, I think the value of this bass will drop if it isn't in "original" shape (if I would ever sell it, probably not...). The neck is maple with black block inlays and black stripes. Would it be necessary to take the finish off and refinish it after a refret? Or would it be better to buy a new neck and store the old?

Thx,
Dries
  #2  
Old 10-13-2009, 09:15 AM
rumblethump's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Pioneer CA
Send a message via Yahoo to rumblethump
Supporting Member
Considering costs and resale, I would buy another neck and store the old.
__________________
A world without music would be wrong!
  #3  
Old 10-13-2009, 09:39 AM
Benjamin Strange's Avatar
Analyzer Records

Endorsing Artist: Mesa/Boogie - Shop Manager/Tech, SF Guitarworks
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Send a message via AIM to Benjamin Strange
Supporting Member
Well, the question is - would you enjoy the bass any less if the frets were changed? It's a tool, man, not a museum piece. I'd only be concerned about resale value if I were actually planning on selling it.

It's possible that the fretboard might need to be resprayed, if the neck needs to be trued before the new frets are installed.
  #4  
Old 10-13-2009, 09:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Niagara Falls, NY
If it has the original binding, I would just get a new neck and store the original. People go bonkers for original fender stuff, so in the event that you would have to sell it you'de be in better shape "all original".

If you do get it refretted, make sure to find an experienced professional. I've done a fret job before, and there is more to it than one might imagine - especially on a finished neck blocked and bound.
  #5  
Old 10-13-2009, 11:41 AM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Supporting Member
Personally, I'd have it re-fretted with original style frets, but I'd have it done by a top-notch luthier.

Basses are to play, and I'd rather keep the original neck on it. This is a qualitative opinion, not quantitative, because odds are that it would re-sell slightly higher with the original, un-re-fretted neck. But many people recognize that eventually, frets wear out.

Besides - if you don't plan to sell it, you ought to play it the way you want to.
__________________
"...awesome as a monkey wearing a tuxedo made of bacon, riding on a unicorn!'"
  #6  
Old 10-13-2009, 11:50 AM
MNAirHead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Minnesota - Twin Cities
Supporting Member
I'd buy a replacement if you dont' care about the name on the headstock.

Smarter folks have noted why above.

It's only original once.
__________________
-------------
-------------
(o)\ ! /(o)
-------------

Minnesota Classic VW Collector & Peavey USA Custom Shop Freak

Peavey USA Club Member # 122 (X40) Bassists who drive a VW club #? (x20+)
  #7  
Old 10-13-2009, 12:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Send a message via ICQ to Slax
I'd say get it refretted. I'd be afraid of getting a new neck and having the original warp while in storage.

Also, IMO, necks drastically change the overall feel of the bass. A new neck might not feel like the same bass...
__________________
SX Club member in good standing
Rickenbacker Club Member #157
Rattle Can Refinish Club #7
  #8  
Old 10-13-2009, 12:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Anaheim, Ca.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benjamin Strange View Post
Well, the question is - would you enjoy the bass any less if the frets were changed? It's a tool, man, not a museum piece. I'd only be concerned about resale value if I were actually planning on selling it.

It's possible that the fretboard might need to be resprayed, if the neck needs to be trued before the new frets are installed.
Exactly... "lose value?" Why would I or anyone who love to play, ever consider buying an instrument that's gonna be difficult to play right from the git-go? Get the refret by all means. A 1972 Fender is not 'rare' in the first place.
  #9  
Old 10-14-2009, 12:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Gent (Belgium)
I think I'll go with a refret. I just love the bass and the feel of the neck!

The Jazz with maple neck, black blocks and bindings was only made from '71 tot '73, so it will get "rare" in a couple of years.

Thx.
  #10  
Old 10-14-2009, 12:44 AM
serein2j's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Supporting Member
If you want to keep that "Originallity" that's when the beauty of bolt on necks comes in.
__________________
P&W Club #461
  #11  
Old 11-18-2011, 04:08 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY
Send a message via Skype™ to Ian Baggette
Hi, I know this thread is a couple years old. But, I have the exact same dilemma (well, mine's a '75). Can you tell us what you ended up doing, how it went, and if you could do so again would you?

I'm considering getting the new neck and just shelving the old one in case I ever do decide to sell it. But, I don't ever really wanna sell it. If I got the new neck put in I'd want to put the Fender Jazz Bass decal on it. I'm more concerned with the play and feel of the instrument, so that's paramount, but maintaining the originality of it is key in case I do come across a collector down the road who is keen on preserving the instrument.

I'm also afraid of wasting the money it would cost to get a new neck and so I'm torn.
  #12  
Old 11-18-2011, 04:10 AM
electracoyote's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Purple Mountain Majesties
Supporting Member
Re-fret. It's not that uncommon. Like Pilgrim said, frets wear out. If it's done by a really good tech, it can breathe new life into the bass. Tossing the original, especially if it's a great neck, doesn't make much sense.
__________________
"That's right Mr. Martini, there is an Easter Bunny!"

WANTED: Vintage Hagstrom Concord in RED
  #13  
Old 11-18-2011, 09:37 AM
96tbird's Avatar
<---Shinola Shite--^
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Supporting Member
Re-fret. Original worn out frets are of little value. If a buyer wanted a discount because of a re-fret, move on. Just silly. If you decide to change the neck, make sure you note the change and the whereabouts of the original neck in your will so your dear lady can squeeze as much cake out of it she can when she sells!
__________________
'74ish Ampeg V4B, 115/210. * '75 Gibson G3. *Epi Tbird. *Squier: VM Jazz, CV 50's P. *Squier VM Jazz Assoc. *MBC 641. Squier owners club
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:48 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.