DI in recording

[quasiz_bassist]

I heard its best to use a DI input, rather than micing an amp. So, how do I go about doing this, just plug my bass into the DI - then the mixer - then the multitrack recorder?

[bassbrad]

It all really depends on the sound you need or want. I usually record using a DI but I also record using effects and occasionally with an amp if I need that sound.
The signal path you describe is correct and the simplest way but there are others. The quality of the DI is a contributing factor and it is best to match it with the recording system. There is no need to go with a ultra high end DI or mic pre if you are recording into a porta studio or a normal computer set up. OTOH you bass sound can suffer if you go cheap on the DI and cables. Most of the time I use my Countryman Type 85, a great all around DI (maybe even the industry standard) but I also opt for a tube DI, ART Tube MP, ART TPS II or a Bellari Stereo tube unit. But if the studio has some really choice piece of gear I'll gladly run my bass thru that.
Using an amp and mic is a whole art form and you really run into a lot of extra time and expense getting it just right.

[these_go211]

great advice by bassbrad! i'll second the countryman di. very solid widely used piece of kit. if you choose to go the di route don't scrimp on your purchase or your tone will suffer.

you'll find that there is no right answer here. there is no "best way." whatever way you like and sounds best to you is the best way. for maximum flexibility it's nice to record both di *plus* a mic'd amp. you can then choose one over the other or blend together.

the sansamp bass driver di gets a lot of love on this forum. it's a di/preamp that simulates a tube amp. it does this very well. one potential problem with mic'ing an amp is that opens a whole can of worms about which mic to use, where to put it, does your room sound good, does the noise bother anyone else, etc. this is why a lot of home recordisits probably choose the di route straight into their mixer.

[agreatheight]

Originally Posted by bassbrad

Using an amp and mic is a whole art form and you really run into a lot of extra time and expense getting it just right.

+1. Using a DI, it is certainly much easier to get a good sound quickly. I use a DI on 95% of my recording projects. Mic'ing is cool too, but it requires a decent amount of set up, and time is money, lol.

If you can cover the expense, the Avalon U5 is a helluva DI. I have tried a bunch and it is by far my favorite, but it'll set you back over $500.

[these_go211]

the avalon will definitely put you in the upper echelon of di's for sure!