My 57 min delay jam

[Nyarlathotep]

Thats right, 57 minutes

8 min Sample #1
8 min Sample #2
8 min Sample #3
The Whole Damn Thing

Enjoy

[Nyarlathotep]

Off-The-First-Page-Bump

I actually didn't expect much of a response to this cus its so long....

[jollygiantchris]

I skipped around on the first 2 parts but #3 I actually enjoyed quite a bit what exactly are you using to create those noises?

[Matt Till]

Not bad, but do you seriously think that is justified as a 57 minute song? I wouldn't release something of that length unless I felt it was necessary. I think it is overkill in this situation. I dig it, but I wouldn't expect anyone to do anything other than skim over it.

[Nyarlathotep]

Originally Posted by jollygiantchris

I skipped around on the first 2 parts but #3 I actually enjoyed quite a bit what exactly are you using to create those noises?

Its 2 signal chains run in parallel (cus my POD can do that ):

Boost -> Fuzz (frankenstien amp model if anyone cares) -> Modulation -> Delay

Boost and fuzz were set the same on both chains, but the mod was a random-depth chorus on one and a phaser on the second. The delays were also different on each: normal digital forward delay on the 1st, reverse delay on the 2nd. The boost, fuzz and mod were set up so i could turn them on/off for each chain. I had the volume set pre everything but the noisegate so i could have the delay running, change stuff, and then add stuff to the delay. I had the feedback set to be controlled by the other exp pedal on my FBV so i could roll the delay back, then add to it again so nothing overloaded

Originally Posted by Matt Till

Not bad, but do you seriously think that is justified as a 57 minute song? I wouldn't release something of that length unless I felt it was necessary. I think it is overkill in this situation. I dig it, but I wouldn't expect anyone to do anything other than skim over it.

Actually, i never meant for it to be 57 mins. I was originally looking to see what sounds i could make with the twin delays, and i recorded it in case something cool came out of the experiment. It just kinda got out of hand, and I think all three sections came out quite good, and belong together. I just couldn't bring myself to split it up. I really didn't want to select out a sample of each section, but i couldn't find a place to upload the entire thing where it wouldnt be deleted after X number of days.

Dont get me wrong tho, i dont expect anyone to play the whole thing. If you do, great!, if you dont, your prolly quite normal.

The one problem, for me, with it being 57 mins, is that now RE/VIVE has to be 2 discs....

[i_got_a_mohawk]

At about 38 minutes theres quite an off note, better re-record it

[Nyarlathotep]

[barbarbass]

Not bad at all -- perhaps a little more development of your basic motifs could have been realized, although I have no idea how possible that would be

Part Three is definitely the strongest bit -- and that's because the musical ideas do exhibit change and growing complexity over time.

This kind of music is very interesting -- you're doing something that is unique.

[jollygiantchris]

So what you're saying is that entire thing is a bass with a pod...Thats crazy.

[Nyarlathotep]

Originally Posted by barbarbass

Not bad at all -- perhaps a little more development of your basic motifs could have been realized, although I have no idea how possible that would be

Part Three is definitely the strongest bit -- and that's because the musical ideas do exhibit change and growing complexity over time.

This kind of music is very interesting -- you're doing something that is unique.

Thanks I think that part 3 is the strongest because I had gotten used to what the 2 delays did, and had that part planned out a little more than 1 or 2.

Originally Posted by jollygiantchris

So what you're saying is that entire thing is a bass with a pod...Thats crazy.

In a word: Yes