Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Live Sound [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Live Sound [BG] New! All issues related to live sound reinforcement & PA systems


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #61  
Old 02-16-2013, 05:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: bronx, nyc
Subscribed
__________________
RokkittBass---practicing learning covers --next step--youtube recording...any help would be cool!
  #62  
Old 02-23-2013, 05:10 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: bronx, nyc
Quote:
Originally Posted by MNAirHead View Post
I own several configurations and brands. Used psm200 are a fantastic value. Much of the stereo and more me can be addressed for 80 usd
Noobie to iem question here
....be gentle!

How can stereo be added to psm 200 for 80 dollars?

And what is more me?

Thanks.....

__________________
RokkittBass---practicing learning covers --next step--youtube recording...any help would be cool!
  #63  
Old 02-23-2013, 03:24 PM
sleeplessknight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by rokkitt View Post
How can stereo be added to psm 200 for 80 dollars?

And what is more me?
I can't speak for the PSM200's stereo ability, but the device MNAirhead's talking about is the Rolls PM351

I haven't quite sussed out the preferred wiring (as I said earlier, I'm definitely 'the better idiot', bane of idiot-proof systems everywhere...), but the gist of it seems to be you can feed your bass into one input of the Rolls, your personal IEM feed into another input, and hook your headphones to the output of the Rolls. When you'd like to hear more of your bass in your IEM (i.e. 'more of myself', aka 'more me') you twist a knob on the Rolls instead of frantically hand-signalling your friendly soundman.
  #64  
Old 02-25-2013, 04:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
I know one of the engineers for Westone. Something that hasn't been mentioned yet but was brought to my attention. Occlusion effect. If you sing and don't get a set of buds that have long ends on them so that the sound comes out close to the ear drum the occlusion effect will drive you crazy.Stick your fingers in your ears and sing or have them full of water and sing. That is Occlusion effect.-
  #65  
Old 02-25-2013, 04:22 PM
sleeplessknight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
That is good to know, thank you!

If I may intrude on your generosity just a bit, do you think you could ask your Westone engineer friend how the 1964-brand custom-molded in-ear buds compare to the Westone custom-molded in-ear buds? :-)
  #66  
Old 02-25-2013, 04:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Sure I'll email him but I think I know what he'll say. Westone are considered the best and he makes his living from them.
  #67  
Old 02-25-2013, 04:37 PM
sleeplessknight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
Haha, fair enough. I'm just curious to know what (if any) compromises were made with the 1964s compared to the Westones, that way I can decide if the Westones are $600 better than the $400 1964s. FWIW, I have a pair of custom-molded Westone earplugs, and they are the bee's knees for sure!
  #68  
Old 02-25-2013, 04:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
I just emailed him and asked him to join in this discussion. He's also a player so I think he will.
  #69  
Old 02-25-2013, 04:45 PM
sleeplessknight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
Thanks dude! Perhaps I should start a different thread...

silvertones' friend - if you do feel like joining the discussion, would you mind PMing me so I can start a topic-appropriate thread? Westone products have a great reputation here, I'm sure lots of folks would love to hear your views!
  #70  
Old 02-26-2013, 08:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
I just heard back from Scott. He's been involved in a song writing competition and also had a business trip. he should chime in at some point I'm sure. he's very dedicated to his company.
  #71  
Old 02-27-2013, 07:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: bronx, nyc
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleeplessknight View Post
I can't speak for the PSM200's stereo ability, but the device MNAirhead's talking about is the Rolls PM351

I haven't quite sussed out the preferred wiring (as I said earlier, I'm definitely 'the better idiot', bane of idiot-proof systems everywhere...), but the gist of it seems to be you can feed your bass into one input of the Rolls, your personal IEM feed into another input, and hook your headphones to the output of the Rolls. When you'd like to hear more of your bass in your IEM (i.e. 'more of myself', aka 'more me') you twist a knob on the Rolls instead of frantically hand-signalling your friendly soundman.

Thanks for the info.....just ordered the rolls pm 351 for 88 bux shipped to my door.....waiting...now the wait! lol

And setting appointment to get impressions for molds done

Rokkitt
__________________
RokkittBass---practicing learning covers --next step--youtube recording...any help would be cool!
  #72  
Old 02-27-2013, 05:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Westone In-Ear Monitors

Whew, my login info from way back in the day still works! I haven't posted here since 2005 when I bought my first bass after decades of guitar playing.

This is Scott from Westone. First of all, I owe gratitude to the TalkBass forum for pointing me towards SX many moons ago. Many many moons ago. I play the SX version of a 62 P-bass custom a couple times a month, and record with it regularly.

I can't address specific questions about competitors, other than Westone are aware of their existence.

Since I was asked to join in here, I will - but I'll just warn folks that this will sound like a sales pitch because it is, unabashedly so!

Westone have been making custom in-ear monitors since the beginning of this type of technology and there are various debates as to whether we were first or not. I can say that we have had a hand in getting some of our key competitors off the ground - good news is that more folks are protecting their hearing while performing, bad news is that our company would be much larger now had we protected our intellectual property.

Westone have been making custom in-ear products since 1959. To this day, our primary business is making the custom in-ear pieces for hearing aids - items that have to be worn for 16+ hours a day for many folks. We ship roughly 500,000 of those every year!

My responsibility for Westone is the Engineering and Technical Sales manager for our hearing protection products. My technical background is that I have a masters degree in engineering with a concentration on acoustics and vibration and R&D management. I am a member of the Acoustical Society of America and the Canadian Standards Association committees on hearing protection standards development. I'm also on the Executive Council for the National Hearing Conservation Association.

I'd like to highlight some technical resources regarding this topic which go along with some of the points made so far. One of the items has to do with whether or not it makes sense to remove an earpiece while performing.

I cannot address as to whether this is wise from an in-ear monitoring standpoint but there is a researcher, Brian Fligor, who with Cory Portnuff, have found what typical signal to noise ratios folks use for .mp3 player use. A discussion of this in interview format is available here: http://www.audiology.org/news/interv...20090319a.aspx

What they have found is that listeners of .mp3 players set the volume of the device so that there is a 13 dB signal to noise ratio.

This has several implications pertinent to this discussion:

1. The better the isolation of the earpiece, the less loud one generally sets the volume of the input to the earpiece.

2. If this can be extrapolated to single-sided monitoring, then likely one does set the volume of the earpiece not removed to a much too high level. I do not have research data to bear this out, but I will mention it to Cory as he is here in Colorado and is also on the Executive Council of the NHCA mentioned above. This could be a research topic for his PhD.

Now, to date, while we do have attenuation information for our in-ear systems, we do not publish it as it is not required information for this type of product, and also we do not want to imply that the product is a hearing protection device. That is not how it is sold. However, products which isolate better will do one of two things:

1. Allow the user to set the output of the device to a lower level, which is better, in the end for the user's hearing.
2. Isolate one from the 'crowd' more, putting more of a burden on ambient monitoring solutions.

This second item is a typical discussion point of using isolating in-ear systems. The suggestions offered so far are excellent - with the main concept being use of an additional 'ambience' microphone that is fed as a channel into the in-ear mix. The Roland V-mix systems actually have a small condenser microphone mounted in each of the mix 'pods' that is user adjustable. However, being a live-sound engineer as well, I will say that I find the Roland V-mix system puts quite alot of burden on the person running the main mixer. The Roland system is ridiculously configurable, so that what is fed from the board to the pods are not necessarily individual channels, but mix groups - eg. the bgv singers can be ganged into a group at the FOH mixer, then sent on a single channel to whomever wants those singers ganged into a single mix group - that takes up just one knob on the mix pod. If you fully mic your drum kit, you can mix that down to a single mix group, or send the individual mic channels along as individual mix groups - each personal mixer user getting their own mix group packaging, with all of those setups stored in the main Roland V-Mix board. The possibilities are nearly limitless, but with that kind of configure-ability comes responsibility and initial setup time. Very cool if you have the time; very cool.

I should also point out that not all systems on the market offer a limiting function to protect hearing. I can say that when I use my Westone ES-5 (which sound like heaven in my ears!) with our AVIOM system at our church, I set the volume so low, that I can get 'ambience' as leftover passive passed-through sound, without worry that even a spike will cause 'shock and awe'! With any of these systems, it takes time getting used to it from a performance standpoint.

One thing that we do at our church with our wired in-ear system is feed our reverb return into one of our in-ear mixer channels that we can then dial in to taste as individuals on the stage. This helps to minimize the 'dry mic' sound that can also happen, where the direct mic'ed signals all get fed directly back into the in-ear mixing system. We don't have an ambience feed as we are in a fairly intimate venue (250 seats) and no super bright lights and so we have a good visual connection to the congregation. We know when we are doing our job to inspire their collective worship visually and even audibly simply from their energetic singing.

We think we make the finest in-ear monitors available on the market, both custom designed and manufactured as well as universal fit products that have our 50+ years of know-how of making custom in-ear products that simply is not available with ANY of our competitors.

Anyways, send me a PM if you have any Westone-specific questions/comments. Here's our gear: http://www.westone.com/music/ make sure to check out the 'bling' on the custom shop page for true GAS inducing product! This is an interactive custom shop configurator - I have Candy Green monitors with the Sunset Exotic faceplates.

-Scott
  #73  
Old 02-27-2013, 06:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Thanks Scott!!!!!!!!!
  #74  
Old 02-28-2013, 03:10 PM
sleeplessknight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Supporting Member
Dude, thank you so much, this was epic!

One question for you: any coupons or specials you know of that would let me score a set of ES3Xs for less than sticker-price? :-D
  #75  
Old 02-28-2013, 04:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Send Scott a PM.
  #76  
Old 03-01-2013, 04:39 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Quote:
Originally Posted by sleeplessknight View Post
Dude, thank you so much, this was epic!

One question for you: any coupons or specials you know of that would let me score a set of ES3Xs for less than sticker-price? :-D
I can't endorse any particular dealer of our products - let's just say that with enough searching, you should be able to find them available for less than MSRP online.

Make sure that when and if you get them, you ask your impression-taker to follow the example of the impression process in this YouTube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiqFiLIVrB8

Key points there are the bite-block maintained open jaw during the process, deep impressions, and full concha included.

You can try this for yourself. With your mouth closed, insert your pinky finger into your ear canal opening. Now open your jaw the farthest that you can open it. Most of the population will experience an enlarging of that canal opening when they open their jaw. By taking the ear impression in this condition, we get an impression that should seal for both the closed jaw as well as open jaw positions. It is in an area that is still soft tissue, so there shouldn't be comfort issues for most persons. The ES series of products from Westone has a canal material that flexes with body heat. I will be wearing my ES-5 on a flight from Denver, enjoying some Zander Zon (His Sonorous CD is my favorite solo bass album.) http://www.zanderzon.com/ That honor used to go to Stanley Clarke's Hideaway album in my collection - but this Zander Zon character - I just love his compositions and tone of that tenor Bass (at least that's what I think it is).
__________________
Thank God for Guitars!
https://soundcloud.com/rockstar_not
  #77  
Old 03-04-2013, 07:47 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: bronx, nyc
Quote:
Originally Posted by rokkitt View Post
Thanks for the info.....just ordered the rolls pm 351 for 88 bux shipped to my door.....waiting...now the wait! lol

And setting appointment to get impressions for molds done

Rokkitt

Just some added info....got thw Carvin system....and the Sansamp tech 21 RBI rack mount pre-amp.

The earbuds with the Carvin are ok.....but I have not tried any other. and want to get impressions ear molds still....

Have to research better ear buds as well.

First we have a tech rehearsal on Wed ...will let u know how it goes!
__________________
RokkittBass---practicing learning covers --next step--youtube recording...any help would be cool!
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Visit TalkBass on Facebook   Download our iOS app   Download our Android app

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 PM.




© 2012 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar too? Visit TalkGuitar.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.