|  | 
02-07-2010, 12:02 PM
| | | | One finger
Sign in to disble this ad
I see a lot of players that pluck with only one finger even on a fast 16 note groove. Is there an advantage to this ? why do you not use both both index and middle ? | 
02-07-2010, 12:20 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: UK | | | Because every note will sound the same.
Try plucking a note with your index finger and then the same one with your middle finger. Listen carefully and you can hear they sound different. | 
02-07-2010, 12:24 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: New Hampshire | | | yeah, i pluck one finger cause it sounds the same | 
02-07-2010, 12:25 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: The Woodlands, TX | | | This small difference bothers me in some songs and in others not at all. Found it best to have the ability to do both two fingers/one finger. Steady 8th/16ths on small gauge strings really stand out in sound difference. | 
02-09-2010, 12:42 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: SF Bay Area/California | | Quote:
Originally Posted by jacohead I see a lot of players that pluck with only one finger even on a fast 16 note groove. Is there an advantage to this ? why do you not use both both index and middle ? | I think it's called the James Jamerson technique. He was known for that and I think we all agree he was a "decent" bassist, no?? | 
02-09-2010, 09:27 PM
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by guitardefector I think it's called the James Jamerson technique. He was known for that and I think we all agree he was a "decent" bassist, no?? | The best Darling Dear | 
02-10-2010, 08:49 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Santiago de Chile | | | No advantage at all... it's supposed to give a more even tone, but the difference is almost not noticeable... besides, if you play fast with one finger, chances are you're gonna do it with certain strength, which won't help in getting a wide range of dynamics | 
02-10-2010, 08:59 PM
|  | Registered User Endorsing Artist: Rosado Guitars, D'addario/Planet Waves Products | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: New York City (Uptown) | | | If you practice it, you'll be able to play at an even volume while plucking with both fingers. | 
02-11-2010, 08:18 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Carmel, IN | | | I think the one finger way seems to have a better pulse. More of a feeling than heard. Really only applys to if you're bangin out the same note. | 
02-11-2010, 08:38 AM
|  | My favorite songs were never heard on the radio | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Tulsa, OK | | I've been using the one-finger RH technique for over 30 years. Why? 'Cause I didn't know any better. As a result I can play even fast string-crossing stuff no problem. Would I be a better bass player if I learned to play with two fingers? Probably, which I why I've been working on it.  | 
02-13-2010, 11:03 PM
| | | | When you get the three finger roll down,..WHHEEEEE! | 
02-14-2010, 12:22 AM
| | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | Quote:
Originally Posted by guitardefector I think it's called the James Jamerson technique. He was known for that and I think we all agree he was a "decent" bassist, no?? | yes, but that's no reason others should do it. if james jamerson stuck his head in a fire, would you?
yeah, there are times you might feel like one finger works better than two, but there's absolutely no advantage to using one finger only. jamerson was a super talent, but we're not jamerson.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| 
02-14-2010, 01:37 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: New Hampshire | | | i dont see much of an advantage to two over one though, honestly. if it was such a big advantage.. wouldnt you see "experts" using all four fingers?
__________________
'Wick Corvette 5 -> MXR M-80 -> B200h -> B410
Acoustic Club #197 Wick Club Member #304
| 
02-14-2010, 01:40 AM
| | | | Ever since I really started really locking in with rhythm sections, I haven't looked at my right hand in ages. If you're not naturally using your index for the same sound, then I'd say don't worry about it. Close your eyes, follow some grooves, and let your right hand do the talking. | 
02-14-2010, 01:45 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: New Hampshire | | | i don't think i ever looked at my right hand, always left when i was learning something.
that, and i use a pick 50-75% of the time anyway (for tone reasons, i actually prefer fingerstyle feel wise)
__________________
'Wick Corvette 5 -> MXR M-80 -> B200h -> B410
Acoustic Club #197 Wick Club Member #304
| 
02-14-2010, 02:52 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London, UK | | Quote:
Originally Posted by PZapdos if it was such a big advantage.. wouldnt you see "experts" using all four fingers? | You do....there are several virtuoso players who do this
__________________
Rickenbacker 4001 > Bass Pod XT Live > ART Pro Channel> Crown XLS1000 > Barefaced Big One
| 
02-14-2010, 08:19 AM
| | Registered User Endorsing: Ampeg | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Apopka, FL | | Quote:
Originally Posted by PZapdos i dont see much of an advantage to two over one though, honestly. if it was such a big advantage.. wouldnt you see "experts" using all four fingers? | you do. but even if some of them didn't, you'd still have to be crazy not to see the advantage of two over one. less work for the one finger, and playing fast is pretty much out of the question with only one. yeah, jamerson did it, but we ain't jamerson.
__________________
Ampeg Portaflex Club #1
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |