|  | 
09-02-2008, 03:58 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Alpharetta (Milton) GA Georgia | | | 4 fingers, 3 frets?
Sign in to disble this ad
I'm looking at the Hal Leonard Bass Method book 1 (since I'm at that level), and they mention "the 3 finger method"; using index, middle, and pinky to span 3 frets.
Is this at odds with the 1-finger 1-fret meme I see here?
In the end I'll be doing what my (soon to be) instructor tells me to do, but want to know what may lay ahead.
Thanks
__________________
Make it work. Make it work right. Make it work fast. IN THAT ORDER.
| 
09-02-2008, 04:08 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Wellington, New Zealand | | | Sounds like the standard double bass Simandl fingering. I use it on electric too. | 
09-02-2008, 04:08 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Seattle | | | when i asked about 1234 vs 124 fingering on another list, all the pros responded the same: They switch back and forth without much thought.
for the lower frets, 124 (URB/Simandl/Carol Kaye method) is appropriate because the stretch is so big as to make 1234 fingering impractical (Assuming you have normal sized hands)
as you go up the neck and the frets get tighter, 1234 fingering becomes more practical.
In the end, it is what is comfortable and healthy for your hands/wrists to play cleanly and clearly that matters. | 
09-02-2008, 04:15 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Alpharetta (Milton) GA Georgia | | Quote:
Originally Posted by mambo4 when i asked about 1234 vs 124 fingering on another list, all the pros responded the same: They switch back and forth without much thought.
for the lower frets, 124 (URB/Simandl/Carol Kaye method) is appropriate because the stretch is so big as to make 1234 fingering impractical (Assuming you have normal sized hands) | I don't if mine are normal, but they're certainly not BIG, and yes way up near the nut those stretches are really hard for me. Quote:
as you go up the neck and the frets get tighter, 1234 fingering becomes more practical.
In the end, it is what is comfortable and healthy for your hands/wrists to play cleanly and clearly that matters.
| Great, thanks.
__________________
Make it work. Make it work right. Make it work fast. IN THAT ORDER.
| 
09-02-2008, 04:31 PM
| | | | I use 1234 fingering only. I have no trouble fretting the lower frets in spite of the wider spacing. I guess it is because I played guitar for a while and got used to doing it that way. My hand size is probably about average.
__________________
Ibanez SR500
SWR LA12 combo
| 
09-02-2008, 05:43 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA | | | First the Simandl fingering you use your ring finger to help support your pinky. As you go up the neck you will switch to one finger per fret. After awhile you will switch back and forth without even thinking about it. As many things in bass if there are multiple ways of doing something best to learn/practice both then let your subconscious decide which to use as you play.
__________________
Steve Barnette
The Dojo of Cool :ninja:
------------------------------------------------------------
Practice is the best of all instructors - Publilius Syrus
| 
09-02-2008, 07:11 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Bronx, NY | | | i use 124 low on the neck and 123 up high. my left pinky is kind of a useless prop.
__________________
...?!
| 
09-02-2008, 07:34 PM
| | | | you shouldent learn finger techneque from a book, atleast i dont think so. if larry graham had corrected himself by reading a book, would he have done himself any good?
jaco says the 1 finger per fret thing is the way to go, the 3 finger 4 fret thing is taken from upright techneque. i use both, but never have to conciously think about it. they switch when neccesary.
__________________
"a man who counts his chickens before they hatch is wise..how can you count chickens the way they run amuck.."
| 
09-02-2008, 07:47 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Sydney | | | Do a search, we have been over this about a billion times before. | 
09-03-2008, 08:57 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Seattle | | | Mutedeity has spoken. This thread is closed. | 
09-03-2008, 03:39 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Seattle | | | nyah nyah still open...
to elaborate on what DocBop said: yes the pinky is supported by the ring finger in 124 fingering.
Actually, I strive to have all my fingers support furthest one being used. so If I'm fretting 1234 and my 3rd finger is down, fingers 1 and 2 are also right there, supporting. and so on for all fingers... | 
09-03-2008, 03:42 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: new jersey | | | i switch it up when needed.
sometimes i play 124 on the lower notes and sometimes i play the 1234 on lower notes.
once i go high, i usually do 1234 unless i am playing an octave or a chord, then i play 14. | 
09-03-2008, 04:18 PM
| | | | Book 2 discusses 1 finger 1 fret (4 fingers 4 frets) :-) | 
09-03-2008, 05:16 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Montréal,Qc,Canada | | | When I practice my stuff(scales,arpeggios,patterns etc) I ALWAYS use 1234. But when I play basslines like 1-8-b7-5 in grooves and stuff like that it is totally comfortable to use 124. It depends on the situation.
I would see the 1234 more as an open position with a lot of notes choice while the 124 feels more like a closed position with less notes option.
Sylvain | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |