|  | 
08-02-2005, 02:52 PM
| | Banned | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Sweden | | | Chromatic scale, how is it?
Sign in to disble this ad
For example if i would like to use a chromatic scale over a G chord whould it be like this:
G||------------------------||
D||------------------3-4-5-||
A||----------3-4-5-6-------||
E||--3-4-5-6---------------||
or every tone on the neck, if so there cant be any key of a chromatic scale?
Also, i have seen classical music where they use weird tone(doesn't fit any scale i know) but it sounds good, is this from the chromatic scale?
If not, what kind of scales gives that classical sound? | 
08-02-2005, 03:19 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Scottsdale, AZ | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Suckbird For example if i would like to use a chromatic scale over a G chord whould it be like this:
G||------------------------||
D||------------------3-4-5-||
A||----------3-4-5-6-------||
E||--3-4-5-6---------------||
or every tone on the neck, if so there cant be any key of a chromatic scale?
Also, i have seen classical music where they use weird tone(doesn't fit any scale i know) but it sounds good, is this from the chromatic scale?
If not, what kind of scales gives that classical sound? | That fingering is not the chromatic scale, you're missing the B and the E. The chromatic scale simply contains (all) 12 notes. | 
08-02-2005, 03:29 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan | | | (Chromatic starting with high G)
0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-12-
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
-------------------------------
(Chromatic startomg with low G)
----------------------------0---
-----------------0-1-2-3-4-----
------0-1-2-3-4----------------
-3-4---------------------------
Major scales sound brighter and happier
Minor scales sound darker and sadder
Last edited by KeithBMI : 08-02-2005 at 03:35 PM.
| 
08-02-2005, 03:31 PM
|  | Registered User Moderator for EHX Forums | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Houston/Nacogdoches | | here's a simpler way
E--0/12\0---
perfectly chromatic 
Last edited by McHaven : 08-02-2005 at 08:23 PM.
| 
08-02-2005, 06:27 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: St. Louis, MO, U.S. | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by nettor here's a simpler way
E--1/12\1---
perfectly chromatic  | Hmm.... When I play that on my fretless I get more than twelve notes.
You're right Suckbird, there's no chromatic key. Classical composers don't use any particular scales to get the sound they do. It sounds classical because it's constructed according to the rules of harmony, and because they compose in a classical style. Often a classical composer uses non-scale tones. That's common in most genres, and not really a defining feature.
__________________
--Paul Donnelly
| 
08-03-2005, 03:51 AM
|  | Unprofessional TalkBass Contributor | | Join Date: Dec 1999 Location: Brighton, England, UK, Europe | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Suckbird
or every tone on the neck, if so there cant be any key of a chromatic scale? | Strict Serialism - as developed by Arnold Schonberg and taken up by the Viennese school in the early 20th C - did use all 12 notes of a chromatic scale as a "12-tone row".
The music was then contructed only using this row and inversions, "transformations" etc, of it.
It was first used in his 2nd string quartet to give a sense of other-worldiness - then in works like "Pierrot Lunaire" etc. etc.
Berg's violin concerto also uses this method. Quote: |
Also, i have seen classical music where they use weird tone(doesn't fit any scale i know) but it sounds good, is this from the chromatic scale?
| Well - you'd have to say what exactly it was you were listening to !!??
"Classical!" is a very vague tem that covers many centuries of music and literally thousands of composers with their own styles ... Quote: |
If not, what kind of scales gives that classical sound?
| Give an example of what you've heard and it should be possible to say whether it's tonal = key centres ; or atonal, using tone rows, serialism etc.
__________________
“Making the simple complicated is commonplace; making the complicated simple, awesomely simple, that's creativity.” Charles Mingus | 
08-03-2005, 04:12 AM
| | zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Scotland | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Bruce Lindfield "Classical!" is a very vague tem that covers many centuries of music and literally thousands of composers with their own styles ...  | Strictly it covers about 70 years. Berg and Schoenberg were not classical composers. | 
08-03-2005, 04:31 AM
|  | Unprofessional TalkBass Contributor | | Join Date: Dec 1999 Location: Brighton, England, UK, Europe | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by dlloyd Strictly it covers about 70 years. Berg and Schoenberg were not classical composers. | Well if you want to be pedantic...
But most people and Music shops/Marketing/charts etc . - consider "Classical" to be anything from Bach (b. 1685) to the 3 Tenors!! And given what the original poster (who I was addressing directly) has already said - I don't think he knows the distinction between Baroque, Classical, Romantic etc 
__________________
“Making the simple complicated is commonplace; making the complicated simple, awesomely simple, that's creativity.” Charles Mingus
Last edited by Bruce Lindfield : 08-03-2005 at 04:34 AM.
| 
08-03-2005, 04:39 AM
|  | Unprofessional TalkBass Contributor | | Join Date: Dec 1999 Location: Brighton, England, UK, Europe | | For the pedants :
The Oxford Dictionary of Music, has several definitions of "Classical Music".
In this particular context, I was using #4 , I quote :
"Classical Music" is used as a generic term meaning the opposite of light or popular music. Music generaly regarded as having permanent rather than ephemeral value.
...rather than a more precise definition of : post-Baroque and Pre -Romantic!! 
__________________
“Making the simple complicated is commonplace; making the complicated simple, awesomely simple, that's creativity.” Charles Mingus | 
08-03-2005, 05:05 AM
| | zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Scotland | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Bruce Lindfield For the pedants :
The Oxford Dictionary of Music, has several definitions of "Classical Music".
In this particular context, I was using #4 , I quote :
"Classical Music" is used as a generic term meaning the opposite of light or popular music. Music generaly regarded as having permanent rather than ephemeral value.
...rather than a more precise definition of : post-Baroque and Pre -Romantic!!  |
Yeah, I know.
Last edited by dlloyd : 08-03-2005 at 05:07 AM.
| 
08-03-2005, 05:13 AM
| | zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Scotland | | | ...athough it's a valid point.
Nobody here (I hope) would argue for lumping Tom Araya and Paul Chambers together as Light/Popular bassists. | 
08-08-2005, 08:11 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Goldsboro / Raleigh NC | | | chromatic = any note
__________________
"Isn't the bass the coolest of the instruments?"
--- Conan O'Brien
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |