Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > General Instruction [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

General Instruction [BG] General questions regarding bass playing, theory, and bass lessons.


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-30-2008, 12:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Medicine Hat
Lightbulb Connection between Music and Math

Sign in to disble this ad
Hi,

For those who are interested...

http://www.scienceray.com/Mathematic...ematics.129161

DCat
__________________
"You will find that playing flashy is as good as wanking but making people dance is better than sex." - no idea who said it!
  #2  
Old 05-30-2008, 01:44 PM
false404's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Supporting Member
Interesting read, I've heard stuff about the relationship of musical ability and doing well with math a little before. I wonder if listening to Tool helps...
  #3  
Old 05-30-2008, 03:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Newark, NJ
Send a message via AIM to DudeistMonk
Great article but...

Quote:
which will give you the key of that note. This will also give you a major scale. According to Answer, majors scales are defined as: “an ascending or descending collection of pitches proceeding by a specified scheme of intervals”. This interval is: x+1+1+1+(1/2)+1+1+1+(1/2), with x representing any note, which was discussed earlier. There are thirteen major scales that are distinct, C, C#, D, D#, E, E#, F, F#, G, G#, A, A#, B. Any scales after these would be defined as octaves, one whole pattern above the others. To find octaves we use the formula (with x representing the first note of any scale):

x=x+13
E# is F and X=X+12 or am I going crazy?

Ohh and check this out its along the same lines but much more complicated http://music.princeton.edu/~dmitri/

Last edited by DudeistMonk : 05-30-2008 at 03:39 PM.
  #4  
Old 05-30-2008, 03:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: erie pa
Send a message via AIM to mikethecannibal
perfect... take the one joy i have away from school, and remind me that it is now reminisciet if my most hated subject... thanks
__________________
we want to make the whole world metal... we want to make everything metal
  #5  
Old 05-31-2008, 05:36 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denmark
Stuff like this is exactly why i find physics fascinating - being able to understand the mechanics and logic behind everyday things, like why some intervals are more pleasing to the ear than others. Could be better written though
  #6  
Old 05-31-2008, 09:04 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Music is basic math because we number things to relate to them. Like intervals up and down add up to 9. A note in an interval is a 3rd up or a 6th down, 4th up or 5th down, 7th up or 2nd down. Chord subs are the 3rd of the current chord for common sub's.

Now when computer got popular I found a lot of computer people were also musicians. Musicians made good computer programmers. So I was talking to a college prof' about that. He said understanding music and computers and how the pieces fit together requires the same sense of abstract logic. That abstract logic comes into play in numbers and recognizing sequences. So its all about how we tend to think about things.
__________________
Steve Barnette
The Dojo of Cool :ninja:
------------------------------------------------------------
Practice is the best of all instructors - Publilius Syrus
  #7  
Old 05-31-2008, 09:06 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Send a message via MSN to crazyguy832
Quote:
In music, the lowest note possible to play is a low “A” at 55 hertz
I call baloney!

>_<

Also, x = x + 12, not x + 13...

That's actually quite a bad article...
__________________
"All truth is simple... is that not doubly a lie?" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Last edited by crazyguy832 : 05-31-2008 at 09:11 AM.
  #8  
Old 05-31-2008, 09:14 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Westfield, MA, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyguy832 View Post
I call baloney!

>_<

Also, x = x + 12, not x + 13...
Actually x = x.

x = x + 12 is a contradiction, no mathematician would ever, ever write that. Using this logic we can draw conclusions such as 17 = 5.

I'm a musician with a degree in mathematics, I find the subject at hand fascinating. That article is pretty terrible though.
  #9  
Old 05-31-2008, 12:34 PM
BassChuck's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Supporting Member
Terrible article. Very narrow and childish. Poorly researched. Many High School students with a good music theory class would be able to shoot holes in it. Mostly involved with showing the connection between SOUND and math... or the connections between WESTERN music notation and math.

What happens when he takes his point of view and applies it to Indian music? Or African rhythms? Most musical idiots can tell the difference between Haydn and Hip Hop... is there a math to show that? (I like the bit about harmonics being more complicated.... that's where some math might help our understanding).

One research that will never be done would be to play Beethoven at 120db to one group of babies and HipHop at muzak volume to another.... I'm going to bet that the HipHopers would be calmer children (and therefore better at school and intellectual tests).

And....BTW..... 55 Hz is NOT the lowest sound posible in music, its the lowest note on his piano. The human ear is capable of lower notes.... 20 Hz is a good place to start on that and 20kHz is an average top sound.
__________________
Never confuse beauty with things that put your mind at ease. -Charles E. Ives
  #10  
Old 05-31-2008, 12:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SoCal
I agree about the article missing its entire target - but the connections it tried to make are still there and are fascinating.

I've started liking math again, now that I'm playing bass - indeed, going back through the history of math (especially geometry) has improved my playing and my math skills.
__________________
Darryl Jones, John Paul Jones, Paul Denman, Berry Oakley, Tom Barney, Freddie Washington
Fender Jazz Bass Club Member #188, Fender MIA Club Member #195
  #11  
Old 05-31-2008, 01:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Sound is physics which has lots of maths in it. The reasons why major chords sound happy lie in physics which uses mathematical formulae.

However Music is NOT maths. Maths is the study of constant events and formulae. i.e. 1+1 =2
In music 1+1 = 42.

Theres no denying that there are patterns in music, but in linking music with maths you take all the artistic benefits and principles. Many people link composers such as Bach with maths, this is garbage. bach uses symbolism and basic patterns which are not maths.
  #12  
Old 05-31-2008, 01:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikethecannibal View Post
perfect... take the one joy i have away from school, and remind me that it is now reminisciet if my most hated subject... thanks
If you hate music so much why are yo on Talkbass?
  #13  
Old 05-31-2008, 05:05 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
The connection of music and math is questionable in my mind. While you can make music about math, my impression is if that proposition is truly valid for everyone, then one is good at one pursuit, and one should be good at the other- and that this would be true for all. I've always and still suck at math, but am (what some say) an excellent or fantastic musician. These are someone else's descriptors, not mine.

Anyway, the connection of math and music is perhaps a plausable connection for those people who approach music in a very analytical way. These people, for instance, can be the type that can sight-read anything (and do it well), but take the music away, and many of these people struggle or even fail even effectively navigate the basic blues song. I've seen this TONS of times.

On the other hand, those people (I am one) who never once thought about the "math" of the music and who are/were much more intuitive musicians operate in a VERY different way than those whose approach is analytical.

People talk about the connection between math and music or vice versa, and at best that connection is valid for only a portion, and not the complete set of those individuals who are musicians.

Lastly, dig deep enough, and you can make anything about math it seems, but that you can draw connections and make analysis (even convincingly) about it does not necesarily make it true.
__________________
Fretless Club Member #199/Fender Jazz Bass Club #78/Virginia Bassist #82/Earplug Club #1
Lawn furniture shouldn't have seatbelts.
  #14  
Old 05-31-2008, 05:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Westfield, MA, USA
I just read through the rest of the article.

For the love of god nobody try to draw any conclusions from it. The music theory is mostly wrong and the mathematics is even worse. I was going to post a few corrections but it would be a long, long post.
  #15  
Old 05-31-2008, 07:15 PM
warnergt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vortex of sin and degradation
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by DudeistMonk View Post
E# is F and X=X+12 or am I going crazy?
+1 I agree with you. It's a fundamental mistake in the article. E# is not distinct from F as claimed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by projectMalamute View Post
Actually x = x.
x = x + 12 is a contradiction, no mathematician would ever, ever write that. Using this logic we can draw conclusions such as 17 = 5.
If the mathematician were a programmer, he just might use such a notation. It's a programmer's notation. e.g. Let x = x + 12.
  #16  
Old 05-31-2008, 07:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Send a message via MSN to crazyguy832
Quote:
Originally Posted by projectMalamute View Post
Actually x = x.

x = x + 12 is a contradiction, no mathematician would ever, ever write that. Using this logic we can draw conclusions such as 17 = 5.

I'm a musician with a degree in mathematics, I find the subject at hand fascinating. That article is pretty terrible though.
Computer sciences disagrees with you.



You're right, I know, I was just pointing something out.
__________________
"All truth is simple... is that not doubly a lie?" -- Friedrich Nietzsche
  #17  
Old 05-31-2008, 08:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Music *is* math.

Music *is* emotion.

The two ideas are not mutually exclusive. Just because *you* don't understand the math behind music doesn't mean there isn't math behind music.

When you pick up the piano, the fretted bass, the electric guitar, you go "music has 12 notes" and you begin to learn how to choose which of those 12 notes to play when. But do you know why those 12 notes were chosen? Out of all the possible subdivisions of the octave, why 12? Or do you know why the seven notes of the major scale were chosen, and why the 12 tone chromatic scale doesn't accurately represent any of those 7 notes but the first? (they're just approximations)

I can guarantee that Bach knew why there are 12 notes per octave and why those 7 notes were chosen for the major scale, and I can guarantee you that when Bach taught music, one of the first things he did was teach the math behind the 7 note major scale.

Bach was so aware of this that he wrote a series of fugues and preludes in all 24 keys (12 major, 12 minor) called The Well-Tempered Clavier, named after a precursor to equal temperament - well temperament.

You don't have to understand the math behind music to appreciate it or even make it on the virtuoso level. Jimi Hendrix may not have known the first bit about the math behind music, or about how electricity works, but when he plugged his guitar into an amplifier he was using both. Dale Ernhardt may not know the first thing about how a combustion engine works, or the physics of keeping a car on the ground at 150 mph, but he was using both when he drove.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CatfishStudios View Post
But vintage cases have better tone.
  #18  
Old 05-31-2008, 08:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Incidentally, that article doesn't answer any of the questions I posed (why 12 notes, why 7 notes) except maybe in the most cursory way and it botches the explanation. It's more likely to turn people off to the true beauty of the math behind music than to turn anyone on to it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CatfishStudios View Post
But vintage cases have better tone.
  #19  
Old 05-31-2008, 08:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
I've said it before, I'll say it again. Music is closer to physics than math. Maybe even closer to drama, visual art, etc.

I know too many musicians that were always terrible at math.
__________________
Lefty Union #153
  #20  
Old 05-31-2008, 08:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Westfield, MA, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyguy832 View Post
Computer sciences disagrees with you.



You're right, I know, I was just pointing something out.
A C++ compiler disagrees with me. A computer scientist would write x := x + 12

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:00 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.