| Ah, nevermind, I had missed your post as to why.
Well, the thing about theory is that, imo, it should not be approached as a means to an end. It's supplemental to what you hear, feel, understand and know about music otherwise. I've learned a crapton of theory in the past 6 years, but ultimately, my knowledge of 'theory'(both classical and jazz) hasn't directly changed anything in my playing or the music I create. It has changed the way I listen to things, which indirectly may have had an effect on my playing/creation.
I personally find so many people have the wrong approach to theory, and it hinders their study of it. I see it all the time when good players sit down and say "okay, time to learn THEORY", they compartmentalize it and separate it from their music, thinking like "okay, this is my MUSIC time, which is different from my THEORY time", while there is something to be said about that approach, I have seen countless players get frustrated with both aspects simply because they are going about them in a confused manner.
Of course, it also depends on what you're actually DOING with music. If you're just playing in a couple rock bands on the weekend or something, knowing theory will most likely only be for your personal edification. If you're hanging with cats that improvise music on the fly and/or rely heavily on written music to jam to, then you'd be well off really paying attention to practical theory.
Meh, I could probably go on with this rant for a long time. Ultimately, my point is that, you want to make sure you're approaching a desire to learn theory from the right angle, or else it is likely that you will end up flustered and/or confused and/or defeated...etc.
__________________
"You are a bunch of ****ers that use a metronome." - tomangelripper
Last edited by Wrong Robot : 09-24-2005 at 02:48 PM.
|