Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > General Instruction [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

General Instruction [BG] General questions regarding bass playing, theory, and bass lessons.


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 08-23-2009, 09:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
Send a message via MSN to kiwlm Send a message via Yahoo to kiwlm
Unhappy HELP: hearing the octave instead of the root

Sign in to disble this ad
I could almost swear that its the octave note being played, which turned out to be the root, what happened was:

1. I was preparing to to learn the song Sublime - Wrong Way from transcriptions from one of the Bass Player Magazine
2. I got hold of the song in media format
3. I listened to it casually and took a quick glance at the transcription.
4. I think, "hey, the first two notes have to be higher than the second two notes, this transcription have to be wrong or they have re-arranged a 5-string for a 4-string!"
5. When I finally try them on the bass, hmm, yeah, the root does sounds more like the record.

The riff sounds like this:
Code:
G-------------------------------------
D---------5-5-6-7------------3-3-4-5--
A-----7-7----------------5-5----------
E-5-5----------------3-3--------------
I have heard about tone deaf, but is there such thing as octave deaf?
  #2  
Old 08-23-2009, 09:19 PM
electracoyote's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Purple Mountain Majesties
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwlm View Post
I have heard about tone deaf, but is there such thing as octave deaf?
Yes, and it's more a case of an audio illusion than you having a dysfunctional ear. I've been playing bass over 30 years, I have a pretty sensitive ear, I learn songs by ear note-for-note perfect all the time, no tabs, just me and my ear, and I STILL get fooled every once in awhile. Usually it has to do with harmonic overtones somehow getting boosted during the recording process and actually making you think you're hearing the note an octave up, but you're actually hearing the harmonic equivalent. Sometimes it takes a lot of listening and re-listening to finally figure it out.
__________________
"That's right Mr. Martini, there is an Easter Bunny!"

WANTED: Vintage Hagstrom Concord in RED
  #3  
Old 08-24-2009, 07:21 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte NC
There is also the illusion of lower notes, combination notes, if memory serves it is used in organs to avoid having to use too large pipes. You can hear them very strongly at the end of Working Man by Rush on the original recording. That guitar riff at the very end you hear the combination tone going way down as he bends up. Check it out.
  #4  
Old 08-24-2009, 10:28 AM
electracoyote's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Purple Mountain Majesties
Supporting Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billnc View Post
There is also the illusion of lower notes, combination notes, if memory serves it is used in organs to avoid having to use too large pipes. You can hear them very strongly at the end of Working Man by Rush on the original recording. That guitar riff at the very end you hear the combination tone going way down as he bends up. Check it out.
+1

Before I started playing bass and guitar, I used to listen to that bent note and the harmonics coming off it and wonder what the hell was going on.
__________________
"That's right Mr. Martini, there is an Easter Bunny!"

WANTED: Vintage Hagstrom Concord in RED
  #5  
Old 08-24-2009, 11:08 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte NC
The clincher is the low note doesn't exist, we hear it because, if we hear two notes that are in the harmonic series of a lower note our brains add the fundamental.
  #6  
Old 08-24-2009, 05:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Send a message via AIM to uethanian
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billnc View Post
There is also the illusion of lower notes, combination notes, if memory serves it is used in organs to avoid having to use too large pipes. You can hear them very strongly at the end of Working Man by Rush on the original recording. That guitar riff at the very end you hear the combination tone going way down as he bends up. Check it out.
yea imagine if organs actually had 32' stops. beastly.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by walker rosewood View Post
Fieldy doesn't play bass. He swats at bungee chords loosely attached to a slab of wood.
  #7  
Old 08-26-2009, 03:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Louisiana
Send a message via ICQ to aikakone Send a message via AIM to aikakone Send a message via Yahoo to aikakone
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billnc View Post
The clincher is the low note doesn't exist, we hear it because, if we hear two notes that are in the harmonic series of a lower note our brains add the fundamental.
I don't understand this clearly. Could you give an example with pitch names? I think that would clear it up for me. Thanks!
__________________
Fretless Club #143/Spector Club #55/Finnish Bassists Club #24
  #8  
Old 08-26-2009, 03:59 PM
jmattbassplaya's Avatar
I'm gonna love and tolerate the **** out of you!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Memphis/Knoxville TN
Supporting Member
I`ll chime in with this, does anyone else typically learn a song by learning it an octave up first? For some reason I have a hard time hearing the bass clearly on a record(especially with modern music-could be all the compression people use now in the studio) and it forces me to learn the bass part an octave up, otherwise I have no clue what`s going on.
  #9  
Old 08-26-2009, 04:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Don't forget it is a studio creation. There may very well be both notes on the recording. There are quite a few songs with, um, ambigious bass parts that are a result of multiple tracks laid on top of each other, sometimes eq'd differently, sometimes played at different octaves, sometimes harmonically, sometimes one is picked and one is not...
  #10  
Old 08-26-2009, 06:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
Send a message via MSN to kiwlm Send a message via Yahoo to kiwlm
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmattbassplaya View Post
I`ll chime in with this, does anyone else typically learn a song by learning it an octave up first? For some reason I have a hard time hearing the bass clearly on a record(especially with modern music-could be all the compression people use now in the studio) and it forces me to learn the bass part an octave up, otherwise I have no clue what`s going on.
I do this as well. For some of the low notes (like the lowest 5 notes on a 4-string), I find it very hard to differentiate the notes in a noisy environment, but I can differentiate them when there's no other noise.

So what I usually do is
1. listen to the record
2. sing it
3. find it on the fretboard
4. play it along with the record to confirm <- this is much easier for me if I play it one octave higher
5. play it back at the same octave and practice away

Thanks for bringing this up, i was thinking about starting another thread about this topic!
  #11  
Old 08-26-2009, 06:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 21804
Quote:
Originally Posted by aikakone View Post
I don't understand this clearly. Could you give an example with pitch names? I think that would clear it up for me. Thanks!
Well, an note and a fifth above it would generate octave below the first note, if i remember correctly.

C2 + G2 = C1 + C2 + G2

C2 + E2 = C2 + E2 + G2

C2 + E2 + G1 = C2+ E2 + G1 + C0

Of course, this all varies with each person and how they perceive sound
__________________
www.myspace.com/iamdakotajohn
G&L Tribute L2000 > GK Fusion 550 > 2 GK Neo 410
  #12  
Old 08-26-2009, 09:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Louisiana
Send a message via ICQ to aikakone Send a message via AIM to aikakone Send a message via Yahoo to aikakone
I think I follow. It's like the mind perceives the notes in a different place along the overtone series and fills in the fundamental or other lower notes.
__________________
Fretless Club #143/Spector Club #55/Finnish Bassists Club #24
  #13  
Old 08-26-2009, 09:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
Send a message via MSN to kiwlm Send a message via Yahoo to kiwlm
Quote:
Originally Posted by totallybacan View Post
Well, an note and a fifth above it would generate octave below the first note, if i remember correctly.

C2 + G2 = C1 + C2 + G2

Of course, this all varies with each person and how they perceive sound
Hmm, but for me, I think I am hearing

C2 + G2 = C2 + G2 + C3

Maybe its because the distance from G2 -> C3 is smaller than C2 -> G2, and my brain tend to do the wrong association.
  #14  
Old 08-27-2009, 07:23 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by aikakone View Post
I think I follow. It's like the mind perceives the notes in a different place along the overtone series and fills in the fundamental or other lower notes.
Yes, studies were done where sine waves were played where the only way the notes would make sense is if they were in the harmonic series of a fundamental. In other words the fundamental was removed. The perception is of the full note. It was thought that it was a 'combination' note and a real acoustic phenomenon but apparently it is an illusion. Paraphrased, probably badly, from "This is Your Brain On Music"

Last edited by Billnc : 08-27-2009 at 04:35 PM.
  #15  
Old 08-27-2009, 10:48 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Louisiana
Send a message via ICQ to aikakone Send a message via AIM to aikakone Send a message via Yahoo to aikakone
I actually have that book. I should go look it up. Thanks, Bill.


[And typo... "sine" waves]
__________________
Fretless Club #143/Spector Club #55/Finnish Bassists Club #24
  #16  
Old 08-27-2009, 04:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by aikakone View Post
I actually have that book. I should go look it up. Thanks, Bill.


[And typo... "sine" waves]
Page 43! Oh and I edited my goofy spelling
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:56 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.