| My personal outlook. Is that theory should be a means of describing and quantifying what you just did, not what you are about to do. I think that thru the study of theory, you potentially open your mind to new ideas, but ultimately, whatever ideas you have in your head are perfectly valid, and knowledge of traditional theory should serve to polish them, arrange them or even explain them. But I do not believe theory should be a means to an end in writing music.
I look at music as an art that I express myself thru. How am I expressing myself if I'm playing by someone else's rules? Or rather, how can I have true expression if I'm limiting myself to the constrains of other people's rules. So, I don't look at theory as a set of rules, especially not in writing music. So I never look at my writing as "okay, I've been studying theory for almost 7 years, let's see, how am I going to apply it to this piece I'm writing?"
You can pretty much always trust your ear because, even if your ear is telling you something that traditional theory says is questionable, that doesn't mean it's wrong.
I have found, in my 7+ years of studying musical theory that, the deeper I get into it, the more 'advanced', the more holistic it becomes. The last theory class I took was an advanced jazz harmony class and it got to the point where teach basically said "welp, really, you can use just about any note or chord anywhere", a stark contrast to beginner classes that focused more on "okay, you can play this here and you can't play this here".
Just imo, ymmv and all that.
__________________
"You are a bunch of ****ers that use a metronome." - tomangelripper
|