Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RyanHelms But how many people got into music as a means of self-expression and will tell you that giving them a written line to play stifles that... It's a tricky subject. My faculty instructor at college used to talk about freedom within limitations. Man did we argue that one!
The point though is this. If you want to audition for a band that works from a book (why are those the bands that seem to always have respectable work  ) you have to be able to sightread.
Out of 300+ tunes in my jazz fakebook, maybe 7 charts have written bass figures. So much for that... |
Interesting points. I came into my present jazz gig not by sightreading, but by being able to work off chord charts on the fly. Our keyboard player occasionally writes out bass figures, but he doesn't bother with standard notation, which I would prefer, actually. The band uses a few different bass subs, and their reading skills are highly divergent, so he does the dreaded "note names under the staff" deal. I want to improve my reading skills, but in the couple of situations where that could've happened, I was always told to play my own lines, that they sounded better anyway. Improv is my strong suit, so they may even have been right, given the band contexts. I have no idealogical problem with playing defined, written parts though. "My own" lines are frequently stolen from records anyway, for the half or so of the tunes that I'm already familiar with.
I realize that the solution is to write out my own bass charts for the tunes, but it's a daunting task, with 200+ songs in our book, plus new ones constantly being added. I guess I'll start with the tunes I solo on, which cuts it to maybe 100 or so.
