I would advise you to be consistent in your labeling. Chord numerals should look like this:
Major - I ii iii IV V vi vii°
Natural minor - i ii° III iv v VI VII
Harmonic minor - i ii° III+ iv V VI vii°
After all, there's a world of difference between this...
iii° iii III III+
... and this:
III III III III
And if you label iio as ii half of the time, you'll end up with inconsistencies.
Your 'merged minor' has a couple mistakes.
Code:
Merged Minor Scales (Natural + Harmonic)
i ii III iv V v VI vii VII
m d M m M M M d M
Should be like this:
Code:
Merged Minor Scales (Natural + Harmonic)
i ii° III iv V v VI vii° VII
m d M m M m M d M
Also, scales. Unique pitch classes have one designation. 1 is 1. 8 is 1. 15 is 1. Number it "1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1" since the whole idea is that the pattern repeats. You wouldn't say 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 for the same scale, after all. Particularly if you're describing a melody in terms of scale degrees and you get something like 6 11 10 9 5 8 7 14 15 13 11... Gets confusing, even though that system better describes octave placement than the equivalent 6 4 3 2 5 1 7 7 1 6 4. When talking about scale degrees, we're more concerned with function than we are with register (Western music generally does not stress the study of register).
List the rest of the intervals. You're missing the augmented fourth/diminished fifth, as well as the major and minor sixth.
I would include diatonic substitutions. IV/ii, V/vii°, that kind of thing.