|  | | 
08-03-2006, 07:50 AM
| | | | What is theory?
Sign in to disble this ad
This may seem an obvious question for you to answer.
But what is it?
Is the quest for theory to know what to play where? But surely those are just answers, or a guideline.
Through reading classical theory books it focuses more on dynamics and devices you can use while playing, then towards the end mentions more traditional modes that we treat as the groundwork for everything.
Where as in jazz stuff it is more "These scales fit here so play these and cash your check".
So by learning theory do we want to know what to play or what could we play?
I know there are players that play by what sounds good and couldn't explain what they do, where as there are others who know what they are doing and do it and wank all over everything.
As I am in a position where I am trying to teach myself theory to understand why players use what were, I am confused, to teach yourself theory you need to stick to the guidelines til they are cemented into your brain and you cn play them with your eyes closed, but to make your lines and playing interesting you must disregard these rules to an extent.
I dunno, this is a semi rant I suppose but more trying to find an answer. | 
08-03-2006, 08:02 AM
| | gone to Longstanton Spice Museum | | Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: UK | | | there's probably a more succinct definition than this, but basically, music theory is a framework to help organize, explain, understand & communicate musical material
I don't believe it's necessarily healthy to 'compose from theory' but everyone does it to some extent.. often when you know what 'ought' to come next in theory, it's not as good as what your ear tells you...
it can be helpful to analyse your music after the fact, but I've frequently come up with stuff that sounded great to me, only to be disappointed when all i'd done was 'invent' something that was really theoretically a bit ordinary & commonplace
I think theory is good for providing you a vocabulary and showing you possibilities open to you, but part of being an artist is to try to 'forget everything you thought you knew', and pull something from lord-knows-where
__________________
what a waste of energy, I'm gone...
mark my words
Last edited by cowsgomoo : 08-03-2006 at 08:23 AM.
| 
08-03-2006, 08:18 AM
| | zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Scotland | | | That's it in a nutshell. | 
08-03-2006, 02:48 PM
|  | Registered User Owner: BassStringsOnline.com | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: LA California | | Understanding theory lets you understand the basic structure of a tune and how chord progressions are formed and where they will go...
example: 2 5 1 ... the most basic progression in Jazz...
someone advanced in theory, would look at a 2 5 1 progression and see coletrane changes, or a chromatic substitution... but you have to make it work...
Theory is fun...  | 
08-03-2006, 03:00 PM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Cincinnati | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Raiven Through reading classical theory books it focuses more on dynamics and devices you can use while playing, then towards the end mentions more traditional modes that we treat as the groundwork for everything. | What book is that? Every book I've read on theory had very little if anything written about performance practices.
__________________
Never confuse beauty with things that put your mind at ease. -Charles E. Ives
| 
08-03-2006, 03:07 PM
| | | | I basically agree with what everyone has said here. My 2 cents: Learning even the most basic type of theory allows you to understand the relationships between musical notes. Majors, minors, key signatures (sharps and flats), 5ths, 7ths, E9Aug5, etc etc.
It helps tremendously when you are navigating on the fretboard, after you have this framework established in your head. It helps you to understand what you are playing, and why.
Last edited by OXploiter : 08-03-2006 at 03:11 PM.
| 
08-03-2006, 03:13 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Buffalo, NY | | | Theory allows us to explain what is happening in music.
Joe
__________________
Public school orchestra director, rock covers, funky organ trio bassist. Lover of soulful things.
| 
08-03-2006, 07:29 PM
| | Registered User m Moderator Emeritus | | Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Connecticut | | | the·o·ry
n. pl. the·o·ries
1. A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.
2.The branch of a science or art consisting of its explanatory statements, accepted principles, and methods of analysis, as opposed to practice: a fine musician who had never studied theory.
3. A set of theorems that constitute a systematic view of a branch of mathematics.
Abstract reasoning; speculation: a decision based on experience rather than theory.
4. A belief or principle that guides action or assists comprehension or judgment: staked out the house on the theory that criminals usually return to the scene of the crime.
An assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a conjecture. music theory n.
the study of the theoretical elements of music including sound and pitch, rhythm, melody, harmony, and notation
Last edited by Joe Turski : 08-03-2006 at 07:31 PM.
| 
08-03-2006, 09:31 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Buffalo, NY | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Joe Turski the·o·ry
n. pl. the·o·ries
1. A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.
2.The branch of a science or art consisting of its explanatory statements, accepted principles, and methods of analysis, as opposed to practice: a fine musician who had never studied theory.
3. A set of theorems that constitute a systematic view of a branch of mathematics.
Abstract reasoning; speculation: a decision based on experience rather than theory.
4. A belief or principle that guides action or assists comprehension or judgment: staked out the house on the theory that criminals usually return to the scene of the crime.
An assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a conjecture. music theory n.
the study of the theoretical elements of music including sound and pitch, rhythm, melody, harmony, and notation | I think number one fits.
Joe
__________________
Public school orchestra director, rock covers, funky organ trio bassist. Lover of soulful things.
| 
08-03-2006, 10:13 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Maine | | | The music almost always does and SHOULD come first. Theory is just a description. It comes along later.
Too much theory-before-the-music KILLS music. Think of when authors try to write a book using only certain words because they sound cool together or because they all have the same numeber of letters...yes it's nice but what does it mean?! Music first! | 
08-03-2006, 11:05 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: San Francisco/Oakland Bay Area | | | I believe that a musician who really understands theory can actually hear the music just by reading the music and not having to play it first. At least that's what the early classical composers did. That is an advantage, knowing theory can do for you, if your ear is well trained. | 
08-03-2006, 11:09 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Fort Worth, TX | | Music Theory of Relativity E=Fb  | 
08-03-2006, 11:10 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: SF, CA | | | Theory is just a tool for you to use as a musician. Music theory is the theory of what sounds good. It's what-sounds-good-ology. Knowing it can only help you. One of the most practical uses is it will help let you know what will sound good togeather (such as harmonies with other instruments in a group,) and what won't. | 
08-04-2006, 01:59 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: New Zealand | | | To me, music theory can act as a type of road map. Depending on where you want to go, determines how you use the theory. | 
08-04-2006, 02:01 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: New Zealand | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by cowsgomoo there's probably a more succinct definition than this, but basically, music theory is a framework to help organize, explain, understand & communicate musical material
| I like the term 'framework'. | 
08-04-2006, 02:22 AM
| | zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Scotland | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by tzadik Too much theory-before-the-music KILLS music. | How much is too much? | 
08-04-2006, 02:48 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Kraków, Polska | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Zebra Theory is just a tool for you to use as a musician. Music theory is the theory of what sounds good. It's what-sounds-good-ology. | Exactly! What sounded good to other people and why. Understanding that it will make it easier for you to sound good as well. It doesn't matter whether you want to play mellow lounge music, death metal or avant-garde music that avoids any similarities to anything conventional.
__________________
youtube.com/krowochron - conformist without a cause
Krappy Klub #2, redneck bassist #7, I back a hot singerbabe #22
| 
08-04-2006, 08:42 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Maine | | When the music loses meaning, one of the causes is too much theory. It is, of course, a matter of opinion -- but that doesn't mean it;s not credible. It just means that people won't always agree.
There is absuloutely a place for theory-centric music....from 12 tone pieces to those tunes in 7 just because someone said "I wanna write in 7 today." But in these cases, theory is a toy that we impose on ourselves to create limits and challenges in hopes of pushing our ear...somewhere. We don't have to use this toy, but we can if we want.
Writing music that is both musical and accessible often needs to start with music, though. Hum something, sing sometime, play it and write it down. Usually it's not a 12 tone row that you hummed. Usually it's not a bar of 7 and a bar of 11 and a bar of 5 in groupings of 3 with five-bar phrasings... usually not. Usually it's some sort of majory or minory thing with phrases that begin and end in places that mimic some sort of predisposed logic. Usually.
In my opinion, and experience, I enjoy using theory when I feel it enhances the music that I write. But it I am writing along, and I'd planned to use only whole tone ideas, but all of a sudden I come across this GREAT sounding thing that is not related to whole tone at all....screw the plans, I'll always try to choose what SOUNDS better. My listeners rarely care how "cool" and "advanced" my theoretical intent is.
If it sounds good, it IS good, as the lord hath sayeth.
Wow, that was long.. | 
08-04-2006, 09:08 AM
| | zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Scotland | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by tzadik When the music loses meaning, one of the causes is too much theory. | I would disagree. Theory is not at fault there, only poor application of theory.
If it sounds good, it is good, and there's always a sound theoretical reason why it is good. If you try to apply that theory to your own composition and it doesn't work, it's because you have either applied that theory badly, misunderstood it, or (and this is the biggy) over-simplified it, missing the overall picture. | 
08-04-2006, 09:20 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Northampton, MA | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by dlloyd I would disagree. Theory is not at fault there, only poor application of theory.
If it sounds good, it is good, and there's always a sound theoretical reason why it is good. If you try to apply that theory to your own composition and it doesn't work, it's because you have either applied that theory badly, misunderstood it, or (and this is the biggy) over-simplified it, missing the overall picture. | +1
Music is like art, you can paint a picture with the wrong colors and it might look good to your eye, but it will never be a masterpiece.
If a work of art looks good, it's probably for a reason according to Art theory. Even if the artist wasn't aware of the rules, he accidentally painted according to theory that made it work.
__________________ Quote: |
Originally Posted by Ostinato The 62 is warm, inviting, classic, like a sexy brunette in a alpaca sweater holding a strong Belgian ale. | Fender MIM Club Member #10
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |