Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Music [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Music [DB] Discuss double bass sheet music, new works, etudes, editions, get recommendations...


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-10-2007, 12:40 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Send a message via AIM to tbassist4
cello suites an octave down

I was just wondering if this is a widely practiced thing. I know that they are very difficult on the cello octave, but I just tried courante from the first suite in the bass's normal orchestral range and actually it sounded really nice. Am I adapting to these very quickly? or are they just plain easy in the lower octave? Also, what level would these pieces be seen at if performed on a bass in the bass's normal register? I ask this because when played on a cello, everything is in first position with a slight amount of shifting (just as when played on the bass in the normal orchestral range), and these pieces are seen as things to work on for one's whole life. I will be entering college in the fall, and I am learning these quite well. Are they of high enough caliber in the lower octave to add to my audtions and work on through college? Or would I just be better off playing them on the original octave? Thanks in advance!
Sign in to disble this ad
  #2  
Old 01-10-2007, 08:47 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Buda (Austin) TX, USA
You can tinker with transposing these to various keys & registers the rest of your life. E. Meyer shifted them a bit in his album: "Meyer transposes the D Minor and G Major suites up one whole tone from the original cello keys, while taking the C Minor work one half step down to B Minor" (from http://www.arkivmusic.com/classical/...p?album_id=458.)
  #3  
Old 01-10-2007, 09:00 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Supporting Member
It depends on your intention. If your goal is to perform them, they can get a bit dull and ponderous down the octave. But they still make great practice down low and are great music, so if it's for fun and education who cares? Enjoy.
__________________
================
Reuben Radding
www.reubenradding.com
  #4  
Old 01-10-2007, 11:53 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
There's an old Peters edition that's written down the octave - not that anyone would need it to read down - so there's definitely precedent for playing down there. Ditto what Reuben said - the suites are such good material that you can morph them anywhere on the bass and learn something out of it.

For an audition, though, I wouldn't play down the octave - just because you don't have the lowest notes and that does kind of kill the flow IMHO. There's a really good transcription by Robert Rohe (available from Lemur, I think) that was written to sort of approximate the difficulty level of the suites on the cello: most of it's below thumb position. G major is in D, D minor is in G, C major is in G, I forget the rest. More challenging without being crazy hard, check it out.
  #5  
Old 01-10-2007, 02:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: El Paso, Texas
Quote:
Originally Posted by billyfalconer View Post
You can tinker with transposing these to various keys & registers the rest of your life. E. Meyer shifted them a bit in his album: "Meyer transposes the D Minor and G Major suites up one whole tone from the original cello keys, while taking the C Minor work one half step down to B Minor" (from http://www.arkivmusic.com/classical/...p?album_id=458.)
With solo strings, these are played in the original keys. Why would you play the first suite in A major? It sounds A, but it's being played in G. The second is in D minor, also, sounding in E minor. The "B Minor," was played in A minor.
__________________
- Jesus D. Apodaca
  #6  
Old 01-11-2007, 01:14 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston, Tx
It is harder in terms of dexterity an octave down, harder to keep in tune an octave up.
I like taking certain phrases in all 3 octaves. I am never going to play them in public, I just use them for technique and musical study. It is not interesting to perform them unless you can really find something to say with them like Edgar Meyer did.
They are a great use of practice time.
  #7  
Old 01-14-2007, 07:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wellesley, MASS
Ed Barker gave a recital here in Boston a few years ago, and he programmed the first three suites; all the repeats, DCs,etc- with an intermission between two and three. I disagree that they may not be interesting when publicly performed. Of course, few of us play as well as Ed. Besides, at any bass recital, there will be a lot of bass players in the audience.

I like the Sterling edition (Peters). I just think the bass sounds best in that range. But that's the beauty of our instrument - there are so many options available for the suites. You can play them how you like (and didn't Brahm's father tell a conductor "don't tell me how to play my bass"?)
  #8  
Old 01-15-2007, 11:42 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bronx, NY
I have been working on the 3rd suite in C, down the octave. I'm close to performance level on the Bouree, still working on Courant and Gigue. I think they sound fine an octave down on the bass. There's not much below low E in these pieces. I will probably never perform them in public but they are already popping up in my solos. And they never fail to inspire.
  #9  
Old 01-15-2007, 11:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston, Tx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simandl Fan View Post
I disagree that they may not be interesting when publicly performed. Of course, few of us play as well as Ed. Besides, at any bass recital, there will be a lot of bass players in the audience.
I think it would be nice to hear Ed play them, Bradetich sounds amazing, too. I said it is only interesting if you can come up with something to say with them.
Regardless, practicing them is something will make most people a better musician, no matter what instrument they play.
  #10  
Old 01-15-2007, 04:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Buda (Austin) TX, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdapodaca View Post
With solo strings, these are played in the original keys.
By whom? When? Only two of the three E. Meyer suites could be, unless he tuned his solo strings down a pitch for #5. The #1 and #2 could have been, but the #5 sounds in b minor, and its original key is c minor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdapodaca View Post
Why would you play the first suite in A major?
I don't know that I would.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdapodaca View Post
The "B Minor," was played in A minor.
How can it be "played in the original key" of c minor if it was "played in A minor"?
  #11  
Old 01-15-2007, 06:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: El Paso, Texas
He plays the first and second suites in the original keys, but with solo strings on.

So the first suite is played in G major, but it sounds in A major. The second suite is played in D minor, but sounds in E minor. The Fifth suite is transposed to A minor, but sounds B minor.

I dont know if this was unclear in my first post.
__________________
- Jesus D. Apodaca
  #12  
Old 01-15-2007, 08:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
octave down, changing key?

Bass-ically, do whatever you can with the material. Remember, it's not written specifically for your instrument. I work on the suites at home, and alternate playing them in different transpositions as much as my brain can tolerate Also, I'm coming from a jazz perspective, so I play them all in jazz pizz as well as bow. I feel the bowings are also subject to interpretation (I have a cello edition), so make do when in different keys or octaves. It's a bass, not a cello.

Does that match up with other people's experience?


-cassidy
  #13  
Old 01-15-2007, 08:49 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Wellesley, MASS
We have to remember that J.S. Bach (or Anna Magdalena) only wrote the notes, not bowings or dynamics or anything else. Whatever book you are using has three hundred years of interpretation layered onto it. Make your own! That is, be honest to the original, but this music was not written for the bass. Put it in another key; take it up an octave or whatever; or play it at pitch; make it interesting for your audience. Damonsmith is right- it's AWESOME material to practice every day, even if you never publicly perform it.
(just one bassist's humble opinion)
  #14  
Old 01-16-2007, 04:20 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chattanooga Tennessee
Send a message via AIM to mcnaire2004 Send a message via MSN to mcnaire2004 Send a message via Yahoo to mcnaire2004
I've seen the original Anna Magdalena cello suites un-edited. There are bowings. Though it can get tricky to figure out when they stop.
__________________
" Practice doesn't make perfect. Perfect practice makes for a good performance" David Creel (Chattanooga Symphony Violinist)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snakewood
Hell man, we're bass players, I wouldn't trade this for anything.
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.