|  | 
09-12-2005, 08:23 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Boulder, Colorado | | | legality question Well, i've been attempting to learn Bottesini's Elegia in D, but I've run into a problem. I have no solo strings, and probably cannot afford them. I would tune my orchestral strings up a tone, but i've heard that its bad for the strings, and they will become too stretched out, therefore becomming very loose and unplayable. I'd assume that the increased tension isn't good for the bridge either. Is it illegal to take that sheet music, enter it into Finale and put it into the correct key for orchestral tuning? I own two copies of the song. I was just wondering if anyone knew off the top of their head. Thanks in advance.
Sign in to disble this ad
| 
09-12-2005, 10:00 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Houston, TX | | | The music is public domain. You can do whatever you like with it. You can even sell it, if you want to. | 
09-12-2005, 10:25 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago, IL | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by tbassist4 Well, i've been attempting to learn Bottesini's Elegia in D, but I've run into a problem. I have no solo strings, and probably cannot afford them. I would tune my orchestral strings up a tone, but i've heard that its bad for the strings, and they will become too stretched out, therefore becomming very loose and unplayable. I'd assume that the increased tension isn't good for the bridge either. Is it illegal to take that sheet music, enter it into Finale and put it into the correct key for orchestral tuning? I own two copies of the song. I was just wondering if anyone knew off the top of their head. Thanks in advance. | Why would you need to re-notate the bass part? Wouldn't it be written in C and sound in D? I could understand if you wanted to write the piano part down a whole step....
__________________
Homo doctus semper in se divitias habet.
| 
09-13-2005, 01:10 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: New York, New York | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Tbeers Why would you need to re-notate the bass part? Wouldn't it be written in C and sound in D? I could understand if you wanted to write the piano part down a whole step.... |
Its kind of like playing the vanhal in C. you can do it, it just doesn't compare to how it sounds in D. | 
09-13-2005, 08:21 AM
| | Banned Owner: Ken Smith Basses, Ltd. | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Perkasie, PA USA | | A thought I think the only differences will be 1) it will SOUND a step lower and its' frequencies and 2) you ONLY have to copy the Piano part down a whole step from D to C as the Bass with solo Strings still plays in C but sounds in D when tuned up a whole step.
My Dragonetti is in G but the Piano part is in A. If I were to perform it with solo strings in A (which I don't feel qualified to do in any key..lol) I would still be reading and "thinking" in G. | 
09-13-2005, 09:11 AM
| | | | first, who publishes this piece? whoever it is owns the copyright so it is not in the public domain. having said that i do not think that for educational purposes putting it into Finale would be a problem.
Maybe Sam will chime in on this being he is a JD. | 
09-13-2005, 11:05 AM
| | | | thanks Sam... Are you billing Paul for all the free legal advice ? | 
09-13-2005, 04:34 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Houston, TX | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by DZ first, who publishes this piece? whoever it is owns the copyright so it is not in the public domain. having said that i do not think that for educational purposes putting it into Finale would be a problem. | The definition of "public domain" on an international legal level, as I understand it, requires that the composer of the piece has been dead for at least 75 years. Bottesini died in 1889.
What the copyright notice refers to for most classical sheet music is the specific edition. That means you can enter all of the notes on the page into a notation program, such as Finale, edit it for clarity, and it will no longer be subject to the copyright on a public domain work. What you can't do is photocopy the music for sales purposes. In fact, I don't think you can ever photocopy it at all, but that's not a particularly enforceable law.
The fact is, most people would rather spend the $20 for professionally edited sheet music than to edit it themselves. Because the Bottesini Elegy is public domain, any edition of your own that you personally edited can legally be sold for profit. | 
09-13-2005, 07:09 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Houston, TX | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Sam Sherry Not quite, counselor, it's a little simpler than that: "Public domain" means that there is not a copyright in effect for whatever reason. | Sorry, I forgot to specify that I was trying to define what makes a composer's music public domain, not the term "public domain."
I'm not a legal expert, as some of you may or may not be. All I know is what I've learned from working with the music-scores.com website, which allows users to download free sheet music of "public domain" music. At the simplest level, for them to not be sued, the composer who wrote the piece they want to make available has to have been dead at least 75 years. | 
09-13-2005, 08:24 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago, IL | | | He isn't going to sell it anyway... does any of this matter?
One concern, if you enter the Elegy into Finale and transpose up a whole step.... The piece was written by a bassist, for bass. The guy knew what he was doing and probably made sure there were no ridiculous fingerings in it. When you play the piece in a different key, all of that will change.
__________________
Homo doctus semper in se divitias habet.
| 
09-13-2005, 08:43 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Houston, TX | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Tbeers He isn't going to sell it anyway... does any of this matter?
One concern, if you enter the Elegy into Finale and transpose up a whole step.... The piece was written by a bassist, for bass. The guy knew what he was doing and probably made sure there were no ridiculous fingerings in it. When you play the piece in a different key, all of that will change. | It's a hypothetical, but it's still worth discussing. I, for one, would like to know if I'm wrong.
The fingerings should be the same. The notes are all in the same place on the bass. The only note changes happen on the piano. | 
09-13-2005, 08:55 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago, IL | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by PaulCannon It's a hypothetical, but it's still worth discussing. I, for one, would like to know if I'm wrong.
The fingerings should be the same. The notes are all in the same place on the bass. The only note changes happen on the piano. | His original post suggests that he may want to transpose the bass part. It seems as though he wants it to sound in D, even with orchestral strings. Of course that's just my interpretation.
__________________
Homo doctus semper in se divitias habet.
| 
09-13-2005, 08:58 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: New York | | | legal issues aside, you can buy most of the bottesini in orchestra tuning from yorke edition. saves you the time of punching the entire piano part into finale. also, i wouldnt suggest changing the key of your bass part. learn the bass part in the original key & this way you wont have to re-learn if/when you do get those solo tuning strings. | 
09-13-2005, 11:28 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Houston, TX | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Tbeers His original post suggests that he may want to transpose the bass part. It seems as though he wants it to sound in D, even with orchestral strings. Of course that's just my interpretation. | It's a bit vague, isn't it? I gave him the benefit of the doubt and assumed he wanted to transpose the piano part. I don't think there would be a way to play the Elegy in D in orchestral tuning without drastically changing how the piece sounded. | 
09-14-2005, 06:56 AM
| | Inadvertent Microtonalist | | Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Portland, ME | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by PaulCannon I'm not a legal expert . . . | As far as I know, none of the lawyers around here are copyright specialists. I'm not. Nevertheless, all of us got into and out of law school, past the bar exam and into a legal career while you were studying penmanship and playing kick-ball at recess. You might assume that we've applied our limited knowledge of copyright law to our own musical situations, too.
But based on the fact that you seem eager to argue the law with a lawyer, I conclude that you are someone who likes to win arguments. Fine. You win this one. I have deleted all my posts (which contain what I believed, at the time, to be accurate if abbreviated descriptions of applicable law). Your own legal advice, dearly bought at backyard weenie roasts and online chat rooms, remains.
Please feel free to favor us with your medical views, investment recommendations and race-track tips as well. All the best of luck to you. | 
09-14-2005, 04:27 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Houston, TX | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Sam Sherry As far as I know, none of the lawyers around here are copyright specialists. I'm not. Nevertheless, all of us got into and out of law school, past the bar exam and into a legal career while you were studying penmanship and playing kick-ball at recess. You might assume that we've applied our limited knowledge of copyright law to our own musical situations, too.
But based on the fact that you seem eager to argue the law with a lawyer, I conclude that you are someone who likes to win arguments. Fine. You win this one. I have deleted all my posts (which contain what I believed, at the time, to be accurate if abbreviated descriptions of applicable law). Your own legal advice, dearly bought at backyard weenie roasts and online chat rooms, remains.
Please feel free to favor us with your medical views, investment recommendations and race-track tips as well. All the best of luck to you. | I didn't realize this was a contest, or even an argument. I said I don't know the law, but I'm offering what I understand it to be. If you know what it is, then I want to be informed. There's no need to be a jerk about it, and it was really unnecessary for you to delete your posts. | 
09-15-2005, 09:25 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Boulder, Colorado | | | no no no you have me wrong as far as key goes, im not trying to transpose the key. The piano score is in D major, but the bass score is in C because of the solo tuning. The bass part is in C to compensate for the step up of the solo tuning, the strings go up a step, the key goes down a step, you're still in D major although the key says C. So basically, when tuned to solo tuning, with the changed key, you are playing the same notes as if it were in Dmajor. That being said i cant afford solo strings, and its not good to tune mine up. So what i wanted to do was change the solo key to the original key so it fit my orchestral tuning, which is one step down from solo tuning. I'm esentially not changing any notes, just tuning and key.
Last edited by tbassist4 : 09-15-2005 at 09:31 PM.
Reason: clarification
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |