Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Music [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Music [DB] Discuss double bass sheet music, new works, etudes, editions, get recommendations...


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-11-2008, 04:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Storrs, CT USA
Vanhal or Kous?

My teacher has given me the choice of either the Vanhal concerto or the Kous concerto to begin working on next semester. I love them both but any thoughts?
Sign in to disble this ad
  #2  
Old 01-11-2008, 04:49 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Pacific Northwest
I prefer the Koussevitzky, mostly because I am in love with Russian Romantic music. It seems a lot more passionate to me than the Vanhal, though I also love that concerto. Although, what's the difference if you are going to learn them both eventually?

I would personally go for the Kouss.
__________________
Witold Lutosławski enthusiast
  #3  
Old 01-11-2008, 08:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Madison, WI/Indianapolis, IN
Quote:
Originally Posted by shostkontrabass View Post
I prefer the Koussevitzky, mostly because I am in love with Russian Romantic music. It seems a lot more passionate to me than the Vanhal, though I also love that concerto. Although, what's the difference if you are going to learn them both eventually?

I would personally go for the Kouss.
not to be a jerk about it but like a lot of the russian composers Koussevitzky was a contemporary composer. I also prefer the Koussevtizky, just because its more musical to me, to me the Vanhal is kind of sterile and boring, but it builds technique like mad though.
  #4  
Old 01-11-2008, 10:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Pacific Northwest
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eli_Upright12 View Post
not to be a jerk about it but like a lot of the russian composers Koussevitzky was a contemporary composer.
Okay, I guess you're right. Koussevitzky was contemporary, but you can still definitely hear some romantic influence in there. Still great music either way.
__________________
Witold Lutosławski enthusiast
  #5  
Old 01-12-2008, 03:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Madison, WI/Indianapolis, IN
Quote:
Originally Posted by shostkontrabass View Post
Okay, I guess you're right. Koussevitzky was contemporary, but you can still definitely hear some romantic influence in there. Still great music either way.
Definitely his influences come from romantic composers thats for sure and I really do like the concert of whether it was written by him or not (there is some controversy about that subject) it also is a great concerto for a student bassist because it requires a lot of different techniques, ie double stops, expressive flowing passages, fast precise passages and many more.
  #6  
Old 01-13-2008, 09:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Send a message via AIM to Cory Palmer
I consider Koussevitzky a late romantic composer not a "20th century" composer.

Koussevitzky is an easier piece to play well than the Vanhal. It is good for auditions. Musically I like the Vanhal better. Koussevitzky's concerto is not a very good piece but it's standard rep so we all need to know it.

Vanhal's concerto is much more interesting musically but you need to know how to play classical period music well. It's really easy to make Vanhal's concerto sound bad.

I suggest learning Koussevitzky before Vanhal.

Last edited by Cory Palmer : 01-13-2008 at 09:34 PM.
  #7  
Old 01-13-2008, 09:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: northeastern CT/central Mass
Vanhal's dates (1739-1813) place him more in the classical age, although consider that Beethoven only outlived him by fourteen years (and Schubert only fifteen). Koussevitzky's not bad, but I think Vanhal's concerto is more beautiful, more perfect to the ear.

Also, Vanhal was the first famous "freelance" composer -- that is, he didn't compose for commissions or a patron. That status wouldn't become common for composers until the 1830s.
__________________
I like the second piece better. - G. Rossini
  #8  
Old 01-26-2008, 12:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Send a message via AIM to thedbassist
Just to let you know, Koussevitzky didn't compose the concerto, Gliere did.
__________________
"That's not how I am. And if I lived in Bach's day, he would have written those cello suites for the bass." Francois Rabbath
  #9  
Old 01-26-2008, 12:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedbassist View Post
Just to let you know, Koussevitzky didn't compose the concerto, Gliere did.
In a vain to attempt to not be "that guy," this rumor has been dispelled numerous times by different sources including Koussevitzky's own wife.

-Pat
  #10  
Old 01-27-2008, 07:47 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Send a message via AIM to thedbassist
Well, in the Koussevitzky Concerto that I bought from Lemur last year, it says that Gliere wrote it.
__________________
"That's not how I am. And if I lived in Bach's day, he would have written those cello suites for the bass." Francois Rabbath
  #11  
Old 01-27-2008, 09:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Pacific Northwest
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedbassist View Post
Well, in the Koussevitzky Concerto that I bought from Lemur last year, it says that Gliere wrote it.
Are you talking about the Liben edition?

It doesn't say that Gliere wrote the concerto. It says that after Nicholas Slonimsky claimed that Koussevitzky could have never written the concerto, Koussevtizky's wife clarified that Koussevitzky had in fact written the concerto, but had gotten help on the orchestration from Gliere.
__________________
Witold Lutosławski enthusiast
  #12  
Old 01-28-2008, 10:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Denton, Texas
Send a message via AIM to Illfavor
But thank goodness for those salon works Gliere did write.......

I'd say Vanhal before Kouss, because, as many have said, it's easier to make the Kouss sound good than it is the Vanhal.

What key (D, E, solo tuning for both) do you guys prefer for the Vanhal?
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 AM.




Copyright ©2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.