|  | | 
02-04-2011, 02:28 PM
| | Registered User Retailer: Shen, Sun, older European | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Burlingame, California | | | Angle of rear face of bridge relative to the top Doublebass luthiers have differing opinions on the angle of the rear face of the bridge relative to the top. Many use 90 degrees, some prefer to bisect the two angled faces of the bridge and some others put it somewhere in between. I've even seen a few with an angle of less than 90 degress, with the rear face of the bridge tilted down a little toward the tail. What approach do you prefer to use and why?
__________________
Steve Swan
Steve Swan Doublebasses
| 
02-04-2011, 03:34 PM
|  | 鉄人マイケル | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Eugene, Oregon | | | With the bridge feet centered on the f-hole nicks, I start mine at 90 and then adjust as needed until the octave harmonic and its fingered note match at the octave-dot position. Doesn't take much adjustment, if any. | 
02-04-2011, 05:06 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: emmitsburg, maryland | | rear of foot at nicks,bridge canted back 2-3 degrees to center the cap over the nicks.
*utilitarian aproach to student plys'
*holds up well and seems to have less of a tendency to warp forward.
*why: i have been instructed to do so...and it does make sense for instruments that get little or too much attention from the instrumentalist!also, increased longevity when they sit @ pitch for extended periods of time.
normal disclaimer:
my old and enduring carved flatback:
split nicks, vert.90 degrees  | 
02-04-2011, 06:04 PM
|  | Supporting Member Luthier: Bresque Basses, rep: Paulin EUB | | Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Sydney, Australia | | | a bridge blank is cut out flat on a special bandsaw at the factory, so the feet and edges are cut perpendicular to one surface anyway. It is much simpler for the luthier to identify that "flat" face, place that side down, trim the feet roughly to size on their own bandsaw and do all the shaping work on the other face. Then you mount the bridge with the "worked" side facing the player. this means the flat back of the bridge will end up perpendicular to the top, unless you tilted the bridge when fitting the feet for some reason. Can't think of a good reason though. | 
02-04-2011, 06:32 PM
| | Registered User Bass Technician, Club Bass - Toronto | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Toronto Canada | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Eisenman With the bridge feet centered on the f-hole nicks, I start mine at 90 and then adjust as needed until the octave harmonic and its fingered note match at the octave-dot position. Doesn't take much adjustment, if any. | Octave dot?
__________________
Instrument Technician, Toronto
| 
02-04-2011, 08:12 PM
|  | 鉄人マイケル | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Eugene, Oregon | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Turnaround
Octave dot? | Yes, I admit to having two dots on the side of my fingerboard: one at third position and one at the octave. I've removed the rest, but these two come in handy. The octave is probably next to go. | 
02-04-2011, 09:25 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Chicago | | | My luthier bisects the edge of the bridge and puts that line 90º to the edge of the C bout. I see many pictures of basses with the
underside of the bridge at 90º. | 
02-05-2011, 09:36 AM
|  | Registered User Owner/The Bass Spa, String Repairman/L & M Vancouver | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Crescent Beach, BC | | | I'm a little flexible on the 90 degree thing. Not all tops are really straight through that region so I take the overall posture into consideration. If I step back from the Bass Clamp and sight the bridge the correct stance is readily apparent.
I would prefer not to have the bridge too far forward as I'd have to leave the bridge a little fatter to strengthen it.
I start with the bridge centred on the f-nicks though. | 
02-13-2013, 11:15 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: New York | | | I did some experiments about the bridge angle and it looks like the bridge (his lower side) slightly angle toward the fingerboard makes my bass sound better. There is a better response and bouncing of the string and also more bass to the sound. I don't know why, but setting the bridge at 90 degrees gives it a tension that doesn't make it sound well... I know this is not orthodox, do anyone else experienced this on his bass? | 
02-13-2013, 12:01 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Germany, Nordrhein-Westfalen | | | Maybe the soundpost is too close to the bridge?
When angling the bridge to the fingerboard you lift the lower edge of the bridge feet and put more weight on the top part of the bridge feet. THat effectively moves the pressure away from the soundpost. But there might be other explanations and effects too. | 
02-13-2013, 01:30 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: New York | | | Mmm actually it's possible, by too close you mean the soundpost should be moved a little bit down or too tight? I think it's probably too tight that might result in a similar effect? I will go to Gage and check, anyway right now the bass sounds and feel great... | 
02-13-2013, 03:53 PM
|  | Supporting Member Luthier: Bresque Basses, rep: Paulin EUB | | Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Sydney, Australia | | | doubleMidi means, if you tilt the bridge towards the fingerboard to change the angle, the feet will lift at the back of the feet, making a gap. the feet will then only be touching at the front edge, and about 20mm further away from the soundpost position. It is this that could be changing your sound, not the angle. | 
02-13-2013, 05:10 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Germany, Nordrhein-Westfalen | | | Thanks Matthew, that's what I meant.
It might also remove a very little bit of pressure (but not much) from the soundpost.
I didn't mean that the soundpost is too tight, but if (!) a little bit of pressure could be removed from the soundpost by angling the bridge towards the fingerboard, it also could mean the soundpost gets a little less tight that way.
But show your instrument to a luthier and explain what you found out and he will inspect your soundpost and probbly also some other things. Better than our guesses... | 
02-13-2013, 05:52 PM
| | Registered User Repair guy, Lisle Violin Shop | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Houston, TX | | | I fit the bridge so the back is at 90 but then slightly arch the back surface by a millimeter. | 
02-13-2013, 10:19 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: New York | | | Ok I see. Well the back of the bridge, at least looking at it it's not at 90 degrees, it really seems to be angled towards the fingerboard, but the feet are still in full contact with the top of the bass. Anyway i'll see what a luthier has to say, so far I am very happy with the sound and feel actually. | 
02-14-2013, 12:04 AM
|  | Supporting Member Luthier: Bresque Basses, rep: Paulin EUB | | Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Sydney, Australia | | | i confess i still don't get that idea Joey. Doesnt change the breakover angle appreciably. how can it actually DO anything? | 
02-14-2013, 08:04 AM
| | Registered User Repair guy, Lisle Violin Shop | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Houston, TX | | | For a given thickness of the crown, it leaves the heart a little thicker. It also helps keep the bridge from warping towards the tailpiece. | 
02-14-2013, 08:53 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: New York | | | The thing is that i have adjustable bridge, so I can move the top part of the bridge without affecting to much the feet apparently. I guess it still should be at 90 degrees though... | 
02-14-2013, 03:44 PM
| | Registered User Repair guy, Lisle Violin Shop | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Houston, TX | | | Having it stand any way other then how it was fitted will cause it to warp. | 
02-14-2013, 04:19 PM
|  | Supporting Member Luthier: Bresque Basses, rep: Paulin EUB | | Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Sydney, Australia | | | two discussions going here sorry for the derail but ... my question is HOW does it stop the bridge warping? I can leave the heart thicker ... simply by leaving the heart thicker, and still get any crown thickness. despite all the oberlin discussion ... i just don't get it.
if its just a visual thing, well yes maybe ...
maybe i should chew on this bone offline! | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |