Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Setup & Repair [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Setup & Repair [DB] Exploring the issues involved in setting up and repairing basses, along with luthier recommendations.


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 11-20-2007, 03:19 AM
Registered User

Private Inventor - Bass Capos
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cologne/Göttingen, Germany
C-Extension Scroll hole. To drill or not to drill?

Probably no aspect of luthiery has advanced and evolved in the past 10 to 20 years as much as C-Extensions. I am constantly amazed at the quality and creativity behind some of the latest work. I wonder about one trend, however. That is the routing of the string back over the scroll into the pegbox, rather than through it. The appeal is obvious, but could there be disadvantages? The tension on the scroll and pegbox, and the bending force on the extension itself are radically altered by this innovation. Will this affect the dynamics of that part of the bass? I have played only one bass with this type of extension. I found that the pegbox/extension vibrated wildly when playing the lowest notes. I didn’t play the bass before the extension was installed (it played normally with the E-stop closed, though), and certainly wasn’t able to play the bass with a traditional extension, so this is no scientific evidence. Since direct comparisons are an unlikely option - finding two new basses from the same maker, with very similar extensions, one over and one through, this is a question that will be very difficult to answer with any certainty. Is anyone else thinking about this? Has anyone any relevant experience?
Robobass
Sign in to disble this ad
  #2  
Old 11-20-2007, 06:33 AM
AES Fine Instruments
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brewster, NY, USA
I think the hole-in-the-scroll is better, because it helps the extension be more stable, and sends the string on a more direct path to the tuner (less tension). I rely on the string to hold the extension in place as I don't generally use screws. However, I did build one extension in which the string passed through the body of the extension and no hole was required. It worked fine, but changing strings was a drag.
  #3  
Old 11-20-2007, 10:37 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Stanley, KS (Kansas City)
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnoldschnitzer View Post
I think the hole-in-the-scroll is better, because it helps the extension be more stable, and sends the string on a more direct path to the tuner (less tension)
+1
__________________
95% Retired Mid-Western Luthier
  #4  
Old 11-21-2007, 07:39 PM
Thomas Andres- Bass Makers
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern Virginia
Drilling a hole is the only option on many basses. There simply is not enough room to use three wheels to route the string.
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:38 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.