Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Setup & Repair [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Setup & Repair [DB] Exploring the issues involved in setting up and repairing basses, along with luthier recommendations.


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 12-26-2001, 01:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA (finally!)
Fingerboard shape

I just bought an upright and noticed that the 2 I played had different fingerboard shapes...the one that I did not buy has a circular shape, while the one I bought has a noticeable 'hump' at the A string. Why the different shapes? Are they supposed to be approached differently, or are they for different applications?
Sign in to disble this ad
  #2  
Old 12-26-2001, 02:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: New York, NY
It's not uncommon for a lot of DB fingerboards to display an almost flat region under the E string and a more pronounced radius under the others. Since the amplitude of the E string's vibration is so large, a more gradual curvature would cause the E to rattle against the fingeroard.

I don't know which is more common; sorry.
  #3  
Old 12-26-2001, 02:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Rural Kansas City
I think you are talking about a bevel. They are pretty common. Correct me if I'm wrong guys but I understand that a bevel is kind of an old school carve to compensate for large (gut) E string travel. (vibration) Today’s strings have much smaller diameters therefore we don't need this extra space. Having said that it is "old school", I recently obtained a new bass with a slight bevel. It's all a matter of taste. I don't care for a bevel and plan to carve it out as I have done on other basses.
__________________
Cowboy by night......
  #4  
Old 12-26-2001, 04:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Ridgewood, NJ
I have both. I don't even notice. Basically, I think the difference is immaterial.
__________________
Certified to teach the Alexander Technique. see donaldhigdon.com
  #5  
Old 12-26-2001, 09:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA (finally!)
they don't feel different? I thought the weird slope at the E string was strange at first, but I guess it just takes some getting used to? I remember the flatter radius feeling more natural at first.
  #6  
Old 12-28-2001, 12:09 PM
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
With my current bass I had the problem that the E string would rattle at any height, mostly due to the way that I pull the string. Rather than change my technique Shank came up with a hybrid fingerboard approach (now called the 'Ray Board') that starts with a well-rounded bevel and endins up being fully curved by the time you get to the other end of the fingerboard.

I had the understanding that the beveled fingerboard found on basses and some cellos was to aid with the 'rolliness' of gut strings. With a curved fingerboard like a violin you end up pushing the string down at an angle to the fingerbaord, and the gut string would try to roll away from you. The bevel gave you ergonomic access to a 90 degree depression of the E string.
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:38 PM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.