Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Setup & Repair [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Setup & Repair [DB] Exploring the issues involved in setting up and repairing basses, along with luthier recommendations.


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 01-07-2012, 09:58 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Victoria BC
Ratio between the top part and the legs of a bridge

I was reading on David Gage's website, the part about the set up of the soundpost, and bridge.
He says, the ratio of bridge top to legs should be 1 to 2.
In other words, the legs should be twice as high as the solid part of the bridge is.
I don't think I've ever seen a bridge cut in this manner, with the exception of a picture of Ron Carters bridge. In fact most I've seen tend to be a ratio of 1 to 1., and on some bridges the solid top part is more that 50% of the height.
So my question is, what does it do for the sound of the Bass ??

If I have a bridge that is a 1 to 1 ratio, and I have a bridge made that is a 1 to 2 ratio, what change in sound should I expect ?
I am very curious.
  #2  
Old 01-08-2012, 11:41 PM
Matthew Tucker's Avatar
Supporting Member

Luthier: Bresque Basses, rep: Paulin EUB
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Send a message via Skype™ to Matthew Tucker
Supporting Member
David's words on the subject are sufficiently vague to allow a number of interpretations. It depends where you measure the leg height from - the bottom of the arch? or the bottom of the heart? or some other measurement? And where do you measure bridge top? From the top of the heart to the crown? Bottom of the heart to the crown?

There is no formula, as it depends on the bass and the bridge blank, but generally, what you want to avoid is something like this where too much wood is taken off the top of the bridge:


(this is a picture of a reject bridge from Upton repair website - it was taken off a bass in for restoration ... they were NOT responsible for cutting this one!)

I often see this, after an inexperienced person installs a bridge with adjusters - the inexperienced installer then wonders why the bridge is now too tall and trims the crown rather then further down the legs and feet.

So there is an important structural aspect to it, and then there's the "fine tuning" aspect, as the bridge is a HF filter. The audible effects of bridge shaping can be subtle and depend on the model of the bass, the model of the bridge, and the budget of the owner. And I don't dare start to generalise about it here

Last edited by Matthew Tucker : 01-09-2012 at 12:04 AM.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Visit TalkBass on Facebook   Download our iOS app   Download our Android app

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:03 PM.




© 2012 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar too? Visit TalkGuitar.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.