IANAL (I am not a luthier) but to me the main reason is, don't do something if it isn't necessary, i.e. the KISS principle. One doesn't glue the bridge to the belly, either.
Then there are other things that come to mind, beside the point though they may be:
- The part of the soundpost you would glue is endgrain.
- If a sound post falls, there was a good reason for it. Would you rather pull slivers of wood from the inside of your instrument's belly or back, should those two big pieces of wood decide to get a little farther apart than usual, because of changes in temperature or humidity, or a knock on the edge?
- There is no one single place the soundpost should be. It is often moved around to make tonal adjustments. Think of its position as a parameter for the fine-tuning of the bass' sound.
- What if a different bridge was installed, with a somewhat wider or narrower stance? You'd probably need a shorter or longer soundpost (and the accompanying fitment procedure).
- You don't have a lot of time with hide glue before it sets, and if one were to insist on gluing the soundpost, he wouldn't want to use any other kind of glue. Imagine getting in almost in place just as the hide glue takes hold.
- Suppose you did glue the soundpost - how would you get it loose for a repair (even if you did use hide glue)?
It's just wrong on so many levels!
