Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Double Bass Forums > Setup & Repair [DB]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Setup & Repair [DB] Exploring the issues involved in setting up and repairing basses, along with luthier recommendations.


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 03-12-2001, 01:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Question

On my bass the string height is weird. The string height is really high at the end of the fingerboard and is really hard to play past C in thumb position. But below the octave it's playable.

I'm guessing there is something wrong with maybe the bridge and/or nut but really have no idea. Anybody have any ideas?
Sign in to disble this ad

Last edited by nickchalk : 03-12-2001 at 01:25 PM.
  #2  
Old 03-12-2001, 06:46 PM
Chris Fitzgerald's Avatar
Student of Life
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Reedo's the guy who would normally handle this, but he's in the middle of a move, and may not be around. It might help if you could give some measurements of your string height at the end of your fingerboard. For instance, on my bass (set for jazz playing), the G string is 1/4" off the fingerboard, and the E string is about 1/2". String height for orchestral playing is typically a bit higher, but I'm not sure how much. Does your bridge have adjusters?
__________________
Wherever you go, there you are.
chrisfitzgeraldmusic.com
  #3  
Old 03-12-2001, 08:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Alright, the G and E are both about half an inch. The E is about a tenth more.

And I play mostly orchestral stuff awell as some chamber stuff.
  #4  
Old 03-12-2001, 08:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Colorado Springs CO
It's gettin' kinda hectic around here, but I will still be around for awhile.Some generic measurements for string height are- at the nut, you should just be able to slide a business card through without getting stuck. Now, height at the end of the fingerboard is more varied, accordind to preference,
and you can only go so low before the strings rattle on the fingerboard, or so high that you can't push them down. But, for example, I do know that Rabbath has his string height at 11 MM (about 1/2 inch)at the end of the fingerboard.Strings make a difference, as well. When I got my Obligatos, I had to raise the action a few MM for optimum sound.
another question, in addition to having fingerboard adjusters,is your fingerboard round or beveled?
Makes a big difference in string height.
__________________
"I am beginning to see some improvement"
Pablo Casals, on practicing 3 Hours a day at age 90
  #5  
Old 03-12-2001, 08:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
I have no adjusters but I was think a while go about putting some on. The fingerboard is round.

I think its pretty oubvious my strings are to high because it really hurts to play up near the top (especially my thumb!).

So should I get adjusters to lower the height aswell as having them for the future (I'll be playing this bass for a while), or get a luthier to lower the string height? What would those two operations cost?
  #6  
Old 03-12-2001, 10:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Colorado Springs CO
Quote:
Originally posted by nickchalk

So should I get adjusters to lower the height aswell as having them for the future (I'll be playing this bass for a while), or get a luthier to lower the string height? What would those two operations cost?
You're talking long term vs. short term returns here.
It would be cheaper just to have a luthier shape your bridge, but when the weather changes, you may need to get adjusters anyway, so my advice is to go have it set up with aluminum or wood adjusters. Depending on who does it, it could cost anywhere from $75 to $150, which may seem expensive, but a worthy investment. BTW, you can get bridge adjusters from Lemur or Kolstein's, if you're thinking of doing it yourself, but fair warning, if you've never done any bridge work before,
DON'T START NOW! You could wind up with a much more expensive problem. (up to $350 for a bridge replacement w/adjusters.. gulp!)
__________________
"I am beginning to see some improvement"
Pablo Casals, on practicing 3 Hours a day at age 90
  #7  
Old 03-13-2001, 08:23 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
What's better metal or wood?
  #8  
Old 03-13-2001, 09:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Ridgewood, NJ
There's a report linked to (All Hail) Bob Gollihur's site. The least interference was with maple adjustors, but you'll never find them. Mine were hand made. Next best was ebony. Aluminum was better then brass. But in a way, this is hair-splitting. Plenty of good players specify aluminum, which is less expensive. Avoid brass.
When you measure string height, put the ruler perpendicular to the arc of the finger board. My G is 5mm, the E is 8, with steel strings.
__________________
Certified to teach the Alexander Technique. see donaldhigdon.com
  #9  
Old 03-13-2001, 02:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Thanks guys
  #10  
Old 03-13-2001, 03:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hoboken, N.J. Born In Brooklyn
Question

is your fingerboard round or beveled?
Makes a big difference in string height. [/b][/quote]
Hi ,
How does fingerboard shape affect string height?
  #11  
Old 03-13-2001, 05:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Colorado Springs CO
Quote:
Originally posted by Breitag

How does fingerboard shape affect string height?
I wish I could draw a picture, because it's difficult to explain. On a beveled fingerboard, the bridge must be cut slightly asymmetrically to go with the different radius, which is different than a rounded fingerboard, which is,well, round and according to most luthiers I know, easier to work with because they don't have to adjust the string height for the beveled edge. All I'm really saying, I guess (Because I'm starting to confuse myself ) is that the string heights on round fingerboards are just different than those on beveled boards because they have to account for the different radius.
Did I just say the same thing twice?
__________________
"I am beginning to see some improvement"
Pablo Casals, on practicing 3 Hours a day at age 90

Last edited by reedo35 : 03-13-2001 at 07:10 PM.
  #12  
Old 03-13-2001, 05:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Colorado Springs CO
Thumbs up

Ha! I knew I could find somebody to explain it better! Check out this link to see what Barrie Kolstein says..
http://www.gollihur.com/kkbass/fingerboard.html and once again, Hail Bob!
__________________
"I am beginning to see some improvement"
Pablo Casals, on practicing 3 Hours a day at age 90
  #13  
Old 03-13-2001, 06:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: The State Where Nothing is Allowed
Post

I read this topic today from my office and was curious as to what the height of my strings were.
I am especially interested in string height relative to sound and manufacturer. My obligato's are 4mm at the G string and 6.5mm at the E string. Considering that I have a Kolstein bass I only have 5.5 inches from bridge to the end of my finger board.

Question, would I improve my tonal quality by raising my string height? I am not dissatisfied with it now.
  #14  
Old 03-13-2001, 07:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Colorado Springs CO
Quote:
Originally posted by oldsaw

I am especially interested in string height relative to sound and manufacturer. My obligato's are 4mm at the G string and 6.5mm at the E string. Considering that I have a Kolstein bass I only have 5.5 inches from bridge to the end of my finger board.
That was about what my string height used to be before I got the obligatos. I found that raising the action just a MM (to 5 at the G and 8 at the E) greatly improved my arco sound and although at first it seemed a bit higher than I was used to for pizz play, I found it to be a more "ballsy" sound than when I was just relying on the pickup and the amp to do the work.BTW, I also have a Kolstein Fendt Model and I have it set up the same as My Juzek.
__________________
"I am beginning to see some improvement"
Pablo Casals, on practicing 3 Hours a day at age 90
  #15  
Old 03-28-2001, 08:21 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hoboken, N.J. Born In Brooklyn
Question

Quote:
Originally posted by Don Higdon

The substance of this solution is so profoundly stupid as to be laughable, entirely in character with your theories on harmonics and adjustable tail pieces.
Oh oh What's the story on adjustable tailpieces? I thought I'd try one out. You're scaring me.
Wil
__________________
Wil Hinds
  #16  
Old 03-28-2001, 09:08 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Ridgewood, NJ
See the thread ORCHESTRAL TECHNIQUE-DB- Harmonics.
If you have a proper tailpiece to begin with, you, like 98% of all bassists, won't need an adjustable tail piece.
__________________
Certified to teach the Alexander Technique. see donaldhigdon.com
  #17  
Old 03-30-2001, 11:27 AM
john turner's Avatar
You don't want to do that. Trust me.
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: atlanta ga
hope you guys don't mind, i did some cleanup on this thread.
__________________
Talkbass Forum Administrator Ask me, I'm here to help.

Lord Only on Myspace - 4 New Lord Only Tracks from our 2nd CD
Lord Only - yes. we're back. sorta
versatile residue -12 minute instrumental

I find it elevating and exhilarating to discover that we live in a universe which permits the evolution of molecular machines as intricate and subtle as we. - Carl Sagan
Rock 'n' Roll... It's got nothing to do with journalists, and it hasn't really even got anything to do with musicians, either. - Pete Townsend
  #18  
Old 03-30-2001, 12:03 PM
Chris Fitzgerald's Avatar
Student of Life
Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally posted by john turner
hope you guys don't mind, i did some cleanup on this thread.
__________________
Wherever you go, there you are.
chrisfitzgeraldmusic.com
  #19  
Old 03-30-2001, 03:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: The State Where Nothing is Allowed
Adjustable tailpiece

Quote:
Originally posted by Don Higdon
See the thread ORCHESTRAL TECHNIQUE-DB- Harmonics.
If you have a proper tailpiece to begin with, you, like 98% of all bassists, won't need an adjustable tail piece.

Barrie Kolstein sent me an adjustable tailpiece to try on my base. When it is correctly tuned I do not have to use a wolf eleminator. Needless to say, I sent the original one back to him asap. He says that it isn't getting rid of the wolf, it is some how masking it. I won't pretend to understand how it works, it just does.

Last evening I raised my extended E string height to 8mm to see if it improved the tone quality. It actually made it worse. Just goes to show that every URB has a personality of it's own.
  #20  
Old 03-30-2001, 03:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Ridgewood, NJ
When you raised the E, did you try (within reason) a different interval for that particular string, or did you make it the same as the other strings?
The theoretical argument for adjustable tailpieces is persuasive; on the other hand, I know they are not used at all in some very repectable sections. How much does an adjustable cost?
__________________
Certified to teach the Alexander Technique. see donaldhigdon.com

Last edited by Don Higdon : 03-30-2001 at 03:19 PM.
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:45 AM.




Copyright ©2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All right reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.