After reading a section in Mr. Traeger's book on tailgut settings, and after reading some old posts here on the subject, I made some changes to my setup. I'll post before/after pictures when I get a chance.
Basically, before my tailpiece was pretty much sitting on top of the saddle, and my gut wires were nearly 2 inches apart. This allowed almost no twist in the tail piece. So I installed a new cable (same type as before - 3/32" braided steel cable, coated) and filed grooves into the saddle, forcing the spacing to be about 18mm. I'm sure it could be less. The distance saddle-to-tailpiece is now close to 2", and the tail piece is free to twist nicely. I believe this opened up the bass quite a bit (volumewise).
But what that also did was reduce the afterlength (bridge-to-tailpiece distance), where now it's about 6 3/4" from the bridge top to the string slot in the tail piece - meaning, the vibrating length there is actually a bit shorter, since the string remains in contact with the tail piece for another 1/4" or so in front of the slot. That means the afterlength is less than 1/6 of the mensure.
The bass is now louder, but I wonder if I'm also missing out on having that afterlength be 1/6 exactly. I'm tempted to move the tailpiece back by about 1/2", where I still have a enough length on the tailgut AND a 1/6 afterlength
...but at the same time I'm tempted to leave it alone, since my volume is improved already. Any thoughts on this, specifically trying to shoot for that 1/6" afterlength in my scenario?
If I mess with it even more, I'm considering also installing a rosewood "nut" on the tailpiece, which would precisely define the afterlength. Am I just nitpicking here?
George