|  | 
03-03-2011, 01:47 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Perth, Western Australia | | | Classical vs Acoustic Guitar
Sign in to disble this ad
Despite all my attempts to steer her towards bass or drums, my 11yo daughter qualified for, and is starting classical guitar lessons at school.
Consequently, I'm in the market for a classical guitar with nylon strings. The school sent us a newsletter advising us NOT to get an acoustic guitar, but didn't stipulate the difference between the two.
So, whats the difference between a classical guitar and an acoustic guitar?
Thanks,
D_C
__________________
The best place to feel the bass is down under baby!
Hear me on Myspace @ myspace.com/bassistizzy
| 
03-03-2011, 02:08 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jyväskylä, Finland | | | I think they're talking about a steel string acoustic guitar
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Latimour Wow, you must have some pretty funky looking testicles! :D | | 
03-03-2011, 03:12 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Finland (Northern Europe) | | | Hi.
A Classical nylon string guitar and a "normal" steel string ACG are light years apart when it comes down to technique on both hands.
The construction differences are also drastic, so I'd stick to their suggestion.
Think of it as standard tuned 6 string bass and a 6 string guitar. You can play both the same way if you need to, but when the more suited technique is used, you'll get the most of the instrument.
The downside of buying a classical guitar is obviously that they tend to be rather expensive compared with their steel string cousins.
Regards
Sam | 
03-03-2011, 03:32 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Australia | | | Is she studying with an actual classical guitarist?
I wouldnt rush to buy just so she has something for the first lesson.
Classical guitars do start at cheap prices even by AU standards, but they are crap. So be wary of your typical guitar shop assistant and their knowledge.
The differences are more to do with the size and features like a cutaway to reach the upper frets.
Some adult players still use very small bodied classical guitars.
Asking the teacher for help would be the best option. | 
03-03-2011, 04:25 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Joinville, Brazil | | Quote:
Originally Posted by JtheJazzMan Asking the teacher for help would be the best option. | +1
I started my "real" music study with a classic guitar.
Student models tend to be very cheap. They usually don't even have thusrod (don't know how to spell). But you really won't need it for a while.
Mine is still very playable for a cheap guitar bought in 1996.
Don't know how much you are willing to spend, but try Yamaha: C Series or CGS Series
__________________
Yeah... well...
| 
03-03-2011, 04:35 AM
|  | Registered User Endorsing artist: Musicman basses, Hipshot products | | Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: New York City | | | The simplest and most obvious difference is that a classical guitar is nylon string, an acoustic, steel. I'm pretty certain the string spacing is also a bit wider on a classical, and they have scroll like tuners as opposed to the typical machine heads. Classical guitar is much warmer sounding, and a whole lot easier on the fingers than a steel string. | 
03-03-2011, 04:44 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Palm Beach County, Florida | | | Nut width is more like 1 7/8 vs regular steel string acoustic which are either 1 11/16 or closer to 1 3/4. The neck feels wider too, strings are farther apart.
We have a La Patrie classical guitar. Made by same people that make Seagull and Godin guitars, a Canadian company. Very good value, not too expensive. I like it better than any of the other sub $500 brands I've tried from the major manufacturers. She might need a less-than-full sized model, though. Good luck, she will like it.
BTW that old, beat to crap guitar Willie Nelson plays is a classical nylon-string!!!
__________________
edmidlifecrisis
Squier Classic Vibe Club #57 (Precision)
Kala U-Bass
Fender Road Worn
G&L
Epiphone Jack Casady
| 
03-03-2011, 06:43 AM
|  | Yeah, I've got the moves like Jagger. | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: G.R. MI | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Nerve The simplest and most obvious difference is that a classical guitar is nylon string, an acoustic, steel. I'm pretty certain the string spacing is also a bit wider on a classical, and they have scroll like tuners as opposed to the typical machine heads. Classical guitar is much warmer sounding, and a whole lot easier on the fingers than a steel string. | ^ This
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by BassChalice Everybody pay attention to Phalex now! | Quote:
Originally Posted by champbassist My cat breath smelling a cat's odor is eating. | Quote:
Originally Posted by hover He's got the Moo OO OO OO OO OO OO OObs like Jagger.... | | 
03-03-2011, 07:18 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Central Illinois, USA | | | Classical guitars as opposed to most steel-string guitars have:
A. Nylon strings (plain nylon on the first three, nylon thread with wire wrap on the three basses). That means they also have rather large barrels for the tuning machines, often made of plastic on less expensive ones. Because nylon strings have a lot less tension than steel strings, a classical guitar is much more lightly braced. The nylon strings attach to the bridge by threading through and being tied on (it's much easier than it would appear to be after you get the hang of it, but it can be intimidating at first). All of this means that if you put steel strings on a classical it'll probably destroy the guitar. If you put nylon strings on a steel string guitar it won't have either much volume or tone, assuming you can even get the strings wound on the tuners and attached at the bridge.
B. 12 frets clear of the body while most steel-strings are 14 frets clear. It does affect the visual perception of where you are on the neck, and it's important because most classical guitars don't have many position markers.
C. Flat fingerboards instead of radiused boards. They classical technique relies on the right hand fingers being independent and having a precise angle of attack. The classic has a very flat fingerboard, even flatter than a shred-monster Ibanez guitar. The fingerboard is also much wider than most steel-string guitars to facilitate the techniques.
John
__________________
JTE Spelling, grammar, and punctuation do matter, despite the threats of death by grease fire!
"Without space, music is just noise piling up on itself." TRK
Lakland Owners' Club # 248
| 
03-03-2011, 10:01 AM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: rochester, NY | | | Most classicals, even high end don't have a truss rod because they don't need one. The tension of the nylon strings is not high enough to pull the neck. Hence why you don't want to put steel strings on it.
There are classicals with cutaways, although the low end ones usually don't.
IME cheap classical guitars sound worse then cheap steel string guitars. It also takes a lot more cash to get a decent classical then a decent steel string. The price to quality ratio is much steeper.
Being a girl and only 11, your daughter probably has small hands. You might need to start her on a 3/4 size guitar. See what the teacher thinks.
Aside from the already mentioned physical differences, "classical guitar" is generally considered a real concert instrument, like violin or piano, etc. Whereas steel string guitar leans more towards pop or folk music. In other words a recital might include pieces by Bach, Villa-Lobos, or Phillip Houghton (for the Aussies!) and not your favorite Dave Matthews or Pink Floyd riff. | 
03-03-2011, 04:08 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2002 Location: Kunsan AB, South Korea | | | Ibanez GA5 is a nice entry model and not too expensive, either. | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |