Go Back   TalkBass Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Bass Guitar Forums > Miscellaneous [BG]
Register Rules/FAQ/CUP Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Miscellaneous [BG] Music-related discussion, not specific to the bass or any other forum


Supporting Membership
Thank You

Latest Supporting Member
Donate to Upgrade Today

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 03-09-2005, 11:15 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Send a message via MSN to Chris J
Fender vs. G&L vs. MM

Sign in to disble this ad
Ok guys which is better?

Seriously though, I was in a local store and asked if they carried G&L and they said no. Apparently their reason was because they carried Fender products. The guy explained that because both companies were made by Leo, it would put them in an awkward position to carry both brands. (Ridiculous IMO) But here's what gets me, they carry ernie ball stuff which was also started by Leo. What gives?
__________________
Stay ignorant. It's worked wonders for me.

Mike_v_s
  #2  
Old 03-09-2005, 11:30 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Waco, TX
What does Mike Money have to do with Fender and G&L?!

brad cook
__________________
Check out my photoblog: www. focusedonthelight. net
  #3  
Old 03-09-2005, 12:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: footballscannotbekickediguess
I guess that might make sense in some sort of twisted logical fashion.

No.

It doesn't.

The closest thing I can think of is that to be a xxxbrand dealer, you have to buy $xxx worth of stuff. MusicMan stuff, is a lot of Fender design- but it is cosmetically unique. The G&L stuff, on the other hand, looks like it was designed by Leo Fender. An ASAT looks like a Telecaster, an L1000 looks like a Precision. For a music store to invest the money in instruments, they want to make sure they can sell stuff. If you didn't know a lot of the difference, would you pay $1200 for an L2000 or $300 for a "real" Fender Bass?
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Man Of The Year" Award*
  #4  
Old 03-09-2005, 12:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: footballscannotbekickediguess
Quote:
Originally Posted by DigMe
What does Mike Money have to do with Fender and G&L?!

brad cook
They're all from California?
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Man Of The Year" Award*
  #5  
Old 03-09-2005, 02:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Send a message via MSN to Chris J
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Golden Boy
I guess that might make sense in some sort of twisted logical fashion.

No.

It doesn't.

The closest thing I can think of is that to be a xxxbrand dealer, you have to buy $xxx worth of stuff. MusicMan stuff, is a lot of Fender design- but it is cosmetically unique. The G&L stuff, on the other hand, looks like it was designed by Leo Fender. An ASAT looks like a Telecaster, an L1000 looks like a Precision. For a music store to invest the money in instruments, they want to make sure they can sell stuff. If you didn't know a lot of the difference, would you pay $1200 for an L2000 or $300 for a "real" Fender Bass?

That seems to the the most logical explanation. Thanks. Oh and Brad you crack me up.
__________________
Stay ignorant. It's worked wonders for me.

Mike_v_s
  #6  
Old 03-10-2005, 01:03 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Send a message via MSN to Peter Squire
in my part of the world, a shop has to go through a rigorous selection process to become an authorised Fender dealer, or Gibson or whatever.

MM's are not allowed to be in the same section of the shop as Fenders, G&L's aren't allowed to be stocked by the dealer and Gibsons are not allowed to be stocked in the same area as Epiphones.

Manufacturers have to know that they are getting the best point of sale exposure for their products or they simply deal through another shop.
__________________
Cheers
Pete


Lefty Union Member #2
MM SR5
Fender Jazz '62RI
Ashdown ABM 400 c210T
  #7  
Old 03-10-2005, 08:41 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Washington, DC / Ithaca, NY
Send a message via AIM to Indi86
In my area, the music stores are forced to have very bizarre non-competition agreements. Let me explain. Two stores stock fender, so the third one isn't allowed. Only one store is allowed to stock new Gibsons, and they do so and a lease basis basically. They don't actually own any of their stock in Gibsons- Gibson does. And the store has to pay fees to keep the Gibsons there if they don't sell.

It goes on and on like this... pretty ridiculous.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Follow TalkBass on Twitter   Visit TalkBass on Facebook  

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:48 AM.




Copyright 2011 Talk Music Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Play guitar? Visit our new sister site TalkGuitar.com [beta]
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.